Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
How did you leap from our Ann Taylor working woman who has several partners before settling down, to making her into a teen mom with STDs? These things don't follow. This is another false dichotomy.
You mention divorce rates, but they're quite high in Muslim countries. The veil doesn't stop men from thinking they can do better. Or from taking another wife (many of us think polygamy is destructive, but that's not our topic here.)
We agree teen pregnancies are destructive. But speaking of teen pregnancies, many Muslim countries allow girls to be married at quite young ages. You condemn teen pregnancies, but do you support marriage at such young ages?
STDs, while awful, are generally treatable.
Like others here, I don't think the veil is a good tradeoff. While I think kids shouldn't have sex at young ages, I'd prefer a solution that involves freer access to condoms than, effectively, putting a condom over my entire daughter.
When the United States had mostly teen brides (pioneer days for example) we had fewer unwed teen mothers for sure. But we probably had for more teens having sex and babies back then than we do now. I am sure that is true for the muslim world as well. Very likely with so many teen and young girls marrying in those countries, they have just as many if not more teen girls having sex and babies than in the United States. They just happened to be married 14, 15 & 16 year olds as opposed to unmarried high school students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:12:45 and 12:40 show this is not just innocent curiosity or legitimate concern about hijab.
I leave you to keep filling these pages with more public encouragement to hate Muslims and Islam.
As if there wasn't enough divisiveness and hatred to go around...
Peace!
I think the sheer length of this thread shows how many people are genuinely interested in Islam and are trying to answer their questions about it. I have been impressed by a lot of different pps' knowledge and have learned a lot. This is genuinely one of the most educational threads I have read on this site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
How did you leap from our Ann Taylor working woman who has several partners before settling down, to making her into a teen mom with STDs? These things don't follow. This is another false dichotomy.
You mention divorce rates, but they're quite high in Muslim countries. The veil doesn't stop men from thinking they can do better. Or from taking another wife (many of us think polygamy is destructive, but that's not our topic here.)
We agree teen pregnancies are destructive. But speaking of teen pregnancies, many Muslim countries allow girls to be married at quite young ages. You condemn teen pregnancies, but do you support marriage at such young ages?
STDs, while awful, are generally treatable.
Like others here, I don't think the veil is a good tradeoff. While I think kids shouldn't have sex at young ages, I'd prefer a solution that involves freer access to condoms than, effectively, putting a condom over my entire daughter.
Anonymous wrote:12:45 and 12:40 show this is not just innocent curiosity or legitimate concern about hijab.
I leave you to keep filling these pages with more public encouragement to hate Muslims and Islam.
As if there wasn't enough divisiveness and hatred to go around...
Peace!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
I agree with you pp. Teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, are all bad. I don't know what cancer (?) has to do with it, maybe you mean HPV? Anyway, I managed to wait to have sex until I was married, and so did my husband, all the while wearing whatever I like. Swimsuits, shorts, the whole shebang. Being sexually conservative has NOTHING to do with hijab. Nothing! Look at the problems we have in many Muslim countries: an epidemic of unreported rapes from strangers and known people alike, sexual assault of women in the street, leering and catcalling women in the street, disrespect of women and their place in society. Plus, from what I saw living in a Muslim country, people still "indulged" their lusts, they just did so in secret. What exactly is better about living in that kind of society? I will take the teenage pregnancies over that, thanks.
For every woman that dressed in bikinis, booty short, regular shorts, whatever, yet maintained her virginity and morality I can find you twenty more that did not. For every hijabi woman that was secretly promiscuous I can find you twenty that were not.
Again, pp, would you rather live in a country where women are assaulted in the street in broad daylight, a country that has an unreported rape epidemic- or a country full of non-virgins? I know which I would choose.
NP, but why doe sit have to be either or?
Hijab-defending pp is presenting a false dichotomy- that our choices are hijab-wearing piety or "lustful" western countries where all the teenagers are pregnant and everyone has some sort of sex-induced cancer. Having lived in a Muslim country where most of the women wore hijab, even IF her characterization were true, I would STILL choose the Western country.
I would never live in a country were woman wear a Tichel but Im ok with a hijab. In fact Iran is looking pretty good, they have a woman Vice President, something the US has yet to accomplish.
There are 12 vice presidents in Iran. Only the first VP is what would be equivalent to our VP. The woman VP heads, what else?, the Center for Women and Family Participation Affairs
LIAR
VP Masoumeh Ebtekar is head of Iran’s Environmental Protection Organization, shame on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
I agree with you pp. Teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, are all bad. I don't know what cancer (?) has to do with it, maybe you mean HPV? Anyway, I managed to wait to have sex until I was married, and so did my husband, all the while wearing whatever I like. Swimsuits, shorts, the whole shebang. Being sexually conservative has NOTHING to do with hijab. Nothing! Look at the problems we have in many Muslim countries: an epidemic of unreported rapes from strangers and known people alike, sexual assault of women in the street, leering and catcalling women in the street, disrespect of women and their place in society. Plus, from what I saw living in a Muslim country, people still "indulged" their lusts, they just did so in secret. What exactly is better about living in that kind of society? I will take the teenage pregnancies over that, thanks.
For every woman that dressed in bikinis, booty short, regular shorts, whatever, yet maintained her virginity and morality I can find you twenty more that did not. For every hijabi woman that was secretly promiscuous I can find you twenty that were not.
Again, pp, would you rather live in a country where women are assaulted in the street in broad daylight, a country that has an unreported rape epidemic- or a country full of non-virgins? I know which I would choose.
NP, but why doe sit have to be either or?
Hijab-defending pp is presenting a false dichotomy- that our choices are hijab-wearing piety or "lustful" western countries where all the teenagers are pregnant and everyone has some sort of sex-induced cancer. Having lived in a Muslim country where most of the women wore hijab, even IF her characterization were true, I would STILL choose the Western country.
I would never live in a country were woman wear a Tichel but Im ok with a hijab. In fact Iran is looking pretty good, they have a woman Vice President, something the US has yet to accomplish.
There are 12 vice presidents in Iran. Only the first VP is what would be equivalent to our VP. The woman VP heads, what else?, the Center for Women and Family Participation Affairs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
I agree with you pp. Teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, are all bad. I don't know what cancer (?) has to do with it, maybe you mean HPV? Anyway, I managed to wait to have sex until I was married, and so did my husband, all the while wearing whatever I like. Swimsuits, shorts, the whole shebang. Being sexually conservative has NOTHING to do with hijab. Nothing! Look at the problems we have in many Muslim countries: an epidemic of unreported rapes from strangers and known people alike, sexual assault of women in the street, leering and catcalling women in the street, disrespect of women and their place in society. Plus, from what I saw living in a Muslim country, people still "indulged" their lusts, they just did so in secret. What exactly is better about living in that kind of society? I will take the teenage pregnancies over that, thanks.
For every woman that dressed in bikinis, booty short, regular shorts, whatever, yet maintained her virginity and morality I can find you twenty more that did not. For every hijabi woman that was secretly promiscuous I can find you twenty that were not.
Again, pp, would you rather live in a country where women are assaulted in the street in broad daylight, a country that has an unreported rape epidemic- or a country full of non-virgins? I know which I would choose.
NP, but why doe sit have to be either or?
Hijab-defending pp is presenting a false dichotomy- that our choices are hijab-wearing piety or "lustful" western countries where all the teenagers are pregnant and everyone has some sort of sex-induced cancer. Having lived in a Muslim country where most of the women wore hijab, even IF her characterization were true, I would STILL choose the Western country.
I would never live in a country were woman wear a Tichel but Im ok with a hijab. In fact Iran is looking pretty good, they have a woman Vice President, something the US has yet to accomplish.
There are 12 vice presidents in Iran. Only the first VP is what would be equivalent to our VP. The woman VP heads, what else?, the Center for Women and Family Participation Affairs
Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
Anonymous wrote:12:45 and 12:40 show this is not just innocent curiosity or legitimate concern about hijab.
I leave you to keep filling these pages with more public encouragement to hate Muslims and Islam.
As if there wasn't enough divisiveness and hatred to go around...
Peace!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
I agree with you pp. Teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, are all bad. I don't know what cancer (?) has to do with it, maybe you mean HPV? Anyway, I managed to wait to have sex until I was married, and so did my husband, all the while wearing whatever I like. Swimsuits, shorts, the whole shebang. Being sexually conservative has NOTHING to do with hijab. Nothing! Look at the problems we have in many Muslim countries: an epidemic of unreported rapes from strangers and known people alike, sexual assault of women in the street, leering and catcalling women in the street, disrespect of women and their place in society. Plus, from what I saw living in a Muslim country, people still "indulged" their lusts, they just did so in secret. What exactly is better about living in that kind of society? I will take the teenage pregnancies over that, thanks.
For every woman that dressed in bikinis, booty short, regular shorts, whatever, yet maintained her virginity and morality I can find you twenty more that did not. For every hijabi woman that was secretly promiscuous I can find you twenty that were not.
Again, pp, would you rather live in a country where women are assaulted in the street in broad daylight, a country that has an unreported rape epidemic- or a country full of non-virgins? I know which I would choose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing the hijab for modesty causes less destruction in society than the wanton, reckless, immediate gratification and satisfaction of lust. We see this in teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, broken families that result, cancer, broken lives.
I do not respect such behavior but you still have the right to engage in it. Normally I do not voice my opinions about this and follow a live and let live philosophy, but if you think its fine for you to criticize women who choose to wear hijab, then its fine for you to hear about destructive western behavior.
I agree with you pp. Teenage pregnancies, adultery, STDs, are all bad. I don't know what cancer (?) has to do with it, maybe you mean HPV? Anyway, I managed to wait to have sex until I was married, and so did my husband, all the while wearing whatever I like. Swimsuits, shorts, the whole shebang. Being sexually conservative has NOTHING to do with hijab. Nothing! Look at the problems we have in many Muslim countries: an epidemic of unreported rapes from strangers and known people alike, sexual assault of women in the street, leering and catcalling women in the street, disrespect of women and their place in society. Plus, from what I saw living in a Muslim country, people still "indulged" their lusts, they just did so in secret. What exactly is better about living in that kind of society? I will take the teenage pregnancies over that, thanks.
For every woman that dressed in bikinis, booty short, regular shorts, whatever, yet maintained her virginity and morality I can find you twenty more that did not. For every hijabi woman that was secretly promiscuous I can find you twenty that were not.
Again, pp, would you rather live in a country where women are assaulted in the street in broad daylight, a country that has an unreported rape epidemic- or a country full of non-virgins? I know which I would choose.
NP, but why doe sit have to be either or?
Hijab-defending pp is presenting a false dichotomy- that our choices are hijab-wearing piety or "lustful" western countries where all the teenagers are pregnant and everyone has some sort of sex-induced cancer. Having lived in a Muslim country where most of the women wore hijab, even IF her characterization were true, I would STILL choose the Western country.
I would never live in a country were woman wear a Tichel but Im ok with a hijab. In fact Iran is looking pretty good, they have a woman Vice President, something the US has yet to accomplish.