Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think most posters here have DCs in HS. There is a pervasive sense that all HS kids have to "play a sport" to get into college. Not true, but whatever. So this gives the coaches much too much power and they abuse it. So here is OPs DD a freshman on a competitive team. If she misses it, she will sit on the bench until she learns her "lesson" This comes from the baby boomers kids bulge. Hopefully, as time goes on this trend will end. But for right now, OP is stuck. Also it is freshman year for OPs DD. After sophomore or junior year, DCs have gotten their letters and they can drop the sport, having filled their resumes for college. Creepy and unfair, but there it is.
Not true. My daughter missed a tournament for her uncle's wedding and was never on the bench. We knew about the wedding a year in advance. When the schedule came out she told her coach her whole family would be out of town for her uncles wedding. Would this be a problem? Is there anything extra she can do to help? I also sent an email to the coach and cc'd the director of athletics and the principal of the school. All we got back is no problem, thanks for letting us know in advance. She was never on the bench when she came back. She stayed late 2x the following week to practice extra. Her own doing. Kids that are talented and have poise and confidence will be just fine. If you think your coach is god, can't speak up, always have your tail between your legs or lie to avoid confrontation/getting benched - your coach will bench you more for that then anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree it obscures things a bit. But if it was dance or cheerleading or something else, I'm sure it'd be the same, just with less people chiming in because they are less participated in activities. But I have to believe they have lots of the same pressure and costs and issues that are being raised here.
Hey it could be the Dungeons and Dragons team for all I care. Same stuff. Same opinion. Go to the family event.
Different PP. I don't think so. I think the anti-sport people have really twisted this here. I would have the child miss the tournament, but what I find eye-opening on this thread is this viciousness people apparently harbor towards children (children!) who like sports. Have you read some of what people have wrote here? Apparently playing a team sport means you're setting yourself for a life in a cubicle, never participate in civic life, don't think of anybody other than yourselves, are all deluded into a blind belief you (or your child) will get a scholarship, and don't love family. It's unbelievable.
I'm no team sports fanatic either. I didn't play sports in school. But I find the vitriol here really awful and I think the anti-sports people are probably teaching their own kids some lessons that are a lot worse than what OP's sister is teaching her child.
Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
Anonymous wrote:I agree it obscures things a bit. But if it was dance or cheerleading or something else, I'm sure it'd be the same, just with less people chiming in because they are less participated in activities. But I have to believe they have lots of the same pressure and costs and issues that are being raised here.
Hey it could be the Dungeons and Dragons team for all I care. Same stuff. Same opinion. Go to the family event.
Anonymous wrote:I am family first and lean towoards OP, but the anti-sports rhetoric here has tainted the credibility of this thread.
Sports is a lightning rod and I get that, but this thread, IMO, could be about ANY extracurricular activity. There are parents and kids who become obsessed in whatever activity. It could be sports, debate, orchestra, paegants, drama, science clubs, etc.
Many of you are expressing a disdain for sports generally (because that is how the OP framed it). Fine, but would your thoughts be different if the activity was something you approved of? I guess my point is that by making this about sports specifically and not about extracurriculars generally, your answers will be more extreme and knee jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree. And by "career" you mean high school and a small percent chance of college and the tiniest fraction of a percent beyond that. I think that is where the problem is. Parents push these kids into this competitive dilusion of stardom. Thousands of dollars, picking the right coach, one on one lessons, getting on the elite team, making varsity at freshman. Shipping off to camps and showcases. Most kids are a dime a dozen and no amount of fine tuning will ever get you the stardom. You either have it or you don't. But parents truly feel this tension of "what if I didn't do enough?" And I bet her sister projects this anxiety back onto her son too. Those both feel it is a make/break moment in his "career" and that is the truly sad part. Kids these days no longer have fun. They are prepped from the age of 2. Lives scheduled meticulously and this false hope of stardom. Coaches are high stress because the parents want the best and in their eyes the more the better. Push, push, push.
I've seen a lot of comments like this, claiming that there are a significant number of sports parents who are delusional idiots who think their kids are stars and will get D1 scholarships. I think this is a myth. I have a lot of experience with travel soccer, and don't think I've met more than one or two parents who are confused about their kids' abilities by the time the kid hits high school. You may disagree with the amount of playing time your kid gets vis a vis other kids at the margin, but it becomes obvious through the years which kids are elite at their sport and which ones are not.
And here's the thing that posters like you seem to completely miss: a kid can feel incredibly passionate about a sport even if there is no chance she will play it in college. For many of them, there continues to be joy in playing and improving even if they are on a second or third tier club team. Lots of kids like this have playing in high school as their ultimate sports ambition. This is the case for one of my kids, who loves playing just as much as my more gifted son, and has devoted nearly as much time to it as his brother. We have supported them equally, because we love how much pleasure and learning they've gotten from their soccer experience, not to mention the great friends they and we have made along the way. There is no doubt in my mind that both of them will be playing soccer at one level or another for the rest of their lives. So it's all good, and it's all done for good motives. Just a sad reality that the less gifted kid is subject to the whims of a not very good high school coach in a way that his brother will never be.
Um, wow. So they spend all their time playing soccer. One because he is good. Another because he wants to catch up to good brother. The reason you all have "such great" friends from the sport is because that is all you and your kids see. And you are already pitying the not so good one and his possible sub par performance and coach? Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I think the lesson here for me is for when I have kids and how to navigate this sports (or other activity) world and keep true to my value or priority of family first. How that works within the lives of kids/teens. How to place the context for the family, despite possibly restrictive circumstances and clear benefits of the activities and the commitment to those. Definitely hard. But I keep coming back to - for me - a tournament or sporting event is not more important than a big family event like this (my wedding or if my mom got remarried or if my dad won the nobel prize). I do recognize that as my personal value. Not to be required of others. I think I'm just really still surprised. Maybe that's naive as hell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
so the issues are:
--preexisting commitments and when to break them
--how important are extracurriculars to a teenager's life, vs importance of family connections
--importance of unique events to a family's connections
PP here. I think this is a good synopsis.
You will have to add in how involved the OP is in the kids life. Does her make every birthday? Are they close? Or is this just an "important family event" because it's about her?