Anonymous wrote:Not purely true. Division up to 3 days after fertilization means each new embryo implants separately, sharing nothing. Suggest you do some research.
And, correct, identical twinning is random, matters not hereditarily.
Anonymous wrote:Not purely true. Division up to 3 days after fertilization means each new embryo implants separately, sharing nothing. Suggest you do some research.
And, correct, identical twinning is random, matters not hereditarily.
afield wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Highly unlikely they are identical. Highly.
Yup. 1/9 is pretty unlikely. Its my guess. Maybe because my great-grandmother was an identical twin? Intriguingly, I was told they both have really good umbilical cord insertions in the centers of their respective placentas. So if we assume they get equal nutrition, they should grow about the same size. If they track different sizes...different enough...maybe that will be a leading indicator. I'm just happy that, with gender revealed already, I get to have something else to remain unknowable for now.
Again, if someone told me my child had a 1/9 chance of some disease, I would think that staggeringly high! And yet that same 1/9 of being monozygotic twins...seems very low!
jindc wrote:...if you are before 18-20 weeks, how did you find out your baby's sex? I couldn't schedule an anatomy scan until 18-20 weeks (so, 19 weeks it is).
Is anyone concerned about it being too early so the scan possibly being wrong?
Is anyone holding our for a surprise? We aren't, but I'm one of the later due dates here, so I'm behind
They are doing regular size scans, since she has twins and is 38 she gets watched by the MFM folks like a hawk. Hence this scan at 16w2d, and the sonar tech was able to give us a determination. And yes, you're right, I suppose I'm just taking her word for it, but from what she was showing us, it would have looked very differently had one of them been male. "Real" anatomy scan is at 20w. Plus a fetal cardio since DD has a congenital heart defect (repaired via surgery).
Does anyone know if there is a twins section of this board?
Anonymous wrote:
Highly unlikely they are identical. Highly.
jindc wrote:...if you are before 18-20 weeks, how did you find out your baby's sex? I couldn't schedule an anatomy scan until 18-20 weeks (so, 19 weeks it is).
Is anyone concerned about it being too early so the scan possibly being wrong?
Is anyone holding our for a surprise? We aren't, but I'm one of the later due dates here, so I'm behind
afield wrote:yes, they are dichorionic - 2 sacs. Something like 88-90% are fraternal twins.
Which is what makes it pretty high likelihood that they are fraternal.
HOWEVER if a zygote divides on the early side of the timing, you get dichoionic identical twins.
(It struck me -- if the probability is 1/9 of them being identical, we would all call that pretty low. However, some people would call 1/9 a very "high" probability if the discussion were about some sort of problem.)
afield wrote:Just had DW's growth checkup today. I thought it was the lengthy anatomy scan but that is in 4 weeks, at the 20w mark.
All is proceeding according to plan. A and B are both within 7 grams of each other, around 150g each. And both are.....girls!
I had written my prediction down a few weeks ago "identical twin girls" and sealed it in an envelope. Of them being identical, now at this point...probability is around 1/9 or so. I think So my guess is still a long-shot!