Anonymous wrote:16:53/16:54, please keep that debate in that thread. This thread has been a very positive discussion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here prefers AA? Who here prefers Black?
Signed,
AA
I call myself black. That is what i grew up with, and AA feels a bit pretentious and academic to me. But I don't care if others call me AA. It may be a generational thing too. I am over 40.
Anonymous wrote:Who here prefers AA? Who here prefers Black?
Signed,
AA
Anonymous wrote:Who here prefers AA? Who here prefers Black?
Signed,
AA
Anonymous wrote:Who here prefers AA? Who here prefers Black?
Signed,
AA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Damn, AA OP!
27 pages later
Signed,
Shocked White Poster
I LOVE this thread! I'm impressed by the OP and others who are answering all questions with aplomb. OP, you have more patience than Job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree 100% (also agree with your post preceding this one). Not sure why so many think we need "leaders". It's a bit insulting when you think about it.
I don't like Sharpton or Jackson, but I don't see a problem with a community having leaders. All communities do (and I'm talking about in all aspects of society, not just ethnicity-wise), I don't find it insulting. It's insulting when people ignorantly believe that prominent people of a group represent the thoughts of all people in that group, but there's nothing insulting about having "leaders," IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree. As an honor roll student, I was not teased. I also was and also continue to be down to earth and gregarious.
The only was I could have fit in would have been to get knocked up, speak broken English, and gleefully talk about the Ds and Fs on my report card.
If that's being "down to earth," then no, I wasn't.
Things are different in different areas.
Anonymous wrote:Damn, AA OP!
27 pages later
Signed,
Shocked White Poster
Anonymous wrote:Damn, AA OP!
27 pages later
Signed,
Shocked White Poster
