Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good stuff , some great academic schools on these list.

For all the naysayers who continue to say schools such as Bullis, Landon and SJC are jock schools, they sure pump a lot of kids to some excellent schools.

yes, but only athletes, kids of donors, and URMs. You don't see many students going from those schools to elite colleges on academic merit.

Who cares this is a lacrosse thread. Great job boys

Anonymous wrote:Good stuff , some great academic schools on these list.

For all the naysayers who continue to say schools such as Bullis, Landon and SJC are jock schools, they sure pump a lot of kids to some excellent schools.

yes, but only athletes, kids of donors, and URMs. You don't see many students going from those schools to elite colleges on academic merit.

Good stuff , some great academic schools on these list.

For all the naysayers who continue to say schools such as Bullis, Landon and SJC are jock schools, they sure pump a lot of kids to some excellent schools.

NL and ML neck to neck. Really impressive for both clubs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of these schools could resolve their lack of athletic numbers in 2 years. Reduce the number of non-academic related salary and actively reach out and allow athletic facility use by not trying to turn a profit.

You mean like the IMG model

Close to 40% of the school's staff have nothing to do with education. The administration is bloated with assistants to the assistant in every manner. Landon and GP are not different in this way either, and it's been eroding those campuses too. Next, stop running the facilities like a profit center. There is plenty of time during the day for the AD to reach out to volleyball, lacrosse, basketball, baseball/softball... organizations for them to use the campus. Be creative and schools will grab some of those participants and plenty of participants who can afford the tuition if they think the school is worth it. Until Landon and ML had a big fight, ML used their fields a ton. NL runs summer camps there under very friendly terms. DCE is at Bullis and now GP. NL is at STA. ML is now at EHS. I will bet it pays dividends for their lacrosse team.

And this is the way out, unless the woke culture has become so engrained in those schools. These schools probably view any male sports as toxic and they want to slide to much lower competition.

there really are some complete psychopaths in here

then why engage ffs? let them go play somewhere else please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of these schools could resolve their lack of athletic numbers in 2 years. Reduce the number of non-academic related salary and actively reach out and allow athletic facility use by not trying to turn a profit.

You mean like the IMG model

Close to 40% of the school's staff have nothing to do with education. The administration is bloated with assistants to the assistant in every manner. Landon and GP are not different in this way either, and it's been eroding those campuses too. Next, stop running the facilities like a profit center. There is plenty of time during the day for the AD to reach out to volleyball, lacrosse, basketball, baseball/softball... organizations for them to use the campus. Be creative and schools will grab some of those participants and plenty of participants who can afford the tuition if they think the school is worth it. Until Landon and ML had a big fight, ML used their fields a ton. NL runs summer camps there under very friendly terms. DCE is at Bullis and now GP. NL is at STA. ML is now at EHS. I will bet it pays dividends for their lacrosse team.

And this is the way out, unless the woke culture has become so engrained in those schools. These schools probably view any male sports as toxic and they want to slide to much lower competition.

there really are some complete psychopaths in here

DC Express 2027:
1 Navy (Bullis) Defense
1 St. Joseph's (Bullis) LSM
1 Holy Cross (GP) Midfield
1 Hampton (Bullis) Defense
 
Next Level 2027:
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Defense
1 Cornell (GC) Midfield
1 Dartmouth (Landon) LSM
1 Penn (Bullis) Midfield 
1 Cornell (Landon) Defense 
1 Brown (STA) Defense
1 Delaware (Landon) LSM
1 Brown (GP) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Goalie
1 Georgetown (Landon) Attack
1 Johns Hokpkins (GP) Midfield
1 Villanova (SJC) Attack
1 Villanova (Landon) Attack
 
 
Madlax 2027:
1 AF (SJC) Defense
1 Army (HP-TX) FOGO
1 Penn State (Yorktown) Attack
1 Princeton (GP) Midfield
1 Delaware (GC) Defense 
1 Villanova (SJC) LSM
1 Michigan (Deerfield) Midfield
1 Penn State (SJC) Attack/Midfield
1 Ohio State (Taft) Attack
1 Bucknell (STC) Defense
1 Bucknell (SJC) Defense
1 Providence (GZ) SSDM
1 Colgate (GZ) Midfield
 
VLC 2027:
 
IAC:
Bullis - Navy (D), Penn (M), St. Joseph's (LSM), Hampton (D)
GP - Princeton (M), Brown (A), Johns Hopkins (Midfield), Navy (A), Holy Cross (M)
Landon - Dartmouth (LSM), Cornell (D), Delaware (LSM), Georgetown (A), Villanova (A)
STA - Brown (D)
 
WCAC:
SJC - AF (D), Navy (M), MD (FOGO), Villanova (LSM), Penn State (A/M), Bucknell (D), Villanova (A)
DM - AF (G)
GC - Cornell (M), Delaware (D)
GZ - Providence (M), Colgate (M)
 
MAC:
 
Public:
Yorktown - Penn State (A)
 
Others:
Deerfield - Michigan (D), Michigan (M)
Highland Park HS - Army (FOGO)
Taft - Ohio State (A)
St. Christophers - Bucknell (D), Bucknell (G)

Anonymous wrote:Taft player is from Richmond

Yes, and reclassed and has played for DCE (26), 2 Way, finished with ML.

Landon to Villanova (next level)

Taft player is from Richmond

it's like padding stats

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:thanks for the update on the commitments and doing the posts they’re really easy to read and helpful!

btw - what's up with posting tx and taft players? They aren't local to the DMV.

Play for DMV clubs. It all good!

guest players no bueno

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:thanks for the update on the commitments and doing the posts they’re really easy to read and helpful!

btw - what's up with posting tx and taft players? They aren't local to the DMV.

Play for DMV clubs. It all good!

Anonymous wrote:thanks for the update on the commitments and doing the posts they’re really easy to read and helpful!

btw - what's up with posting tx and taft players? They aren't local to the DMV.

Anonymous wrote:thanks for the update on the commitments and doing the posts they’re really easy to read and helpful!

Welcome!