Wow quite embarrassing for Trump and MAGA after insisting over and over that he’d never come back to the US.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is our military not going there to get this innocent man???????

He's not an innocent man. He was here illegally, found to be an MS-13 gang member twice. He had a hearing and an appeal. He was under court order to self-deport. He failed to do so. He is a citizen of El Salvador, not the U.S.. The gang he claimed to be threatened by if he returned to El Salvador no longer exists, nor does the overall situation in that country. His removal under US State Department Policy IS a military action and is not subject to judicial review. Understand?

Not one thing you said is true. Not a single one.

Oh, but how wrong you are.
Is it your contention he was here legally?
Is it your contention he is a US citizen?
Is it your contention he is not a citizen of El Salvador?

Everything you said is untrue...every single thing.

He went before an immigration judge in 2019 and was told he cannot be deported to Salvador based on the danger to his life in that country. So if he was to be deported, that was the one country, he was not supposed to be deported to.

So while he is not a US citizen and is yes, a citizen of El Salvador, he was in our country due to the danger to his life. And should not have been deported to that country.

Why shouldn't he be allowed to get due process which is part of the constitution! Remember that document? that is the biggest issue here he should've been given due process. He was snatched off the streets w/out an arrest warrant and then just sent to the one country he was not supposed to be sent to.

DP.

I agree with everything you said, but now what? Does the USA have the authority to force El Salvador to send him back?

Force El Salvador? lol. We’re paying them to keep him there. If we say release him, that’s all they need to hear. They said so themselves. What I’m wondering now is could another country like Canada agree to take him in if the US refuses to take him back? I can’t even believe I’m asking this question and I just am in disbelief what our country has become. It’s so sad.

We can not pay El Salvador to keep one of their citizens in jail. We have no authority to do so. He is in jail IN El Salvador because they want him in jail.

As far as the USA refusing to take him back, that’s already settled. He has a deportation order, he will not be coming back, as he has no right to be here. He was always going to be deported, that has not changed.

This aged poorly.

You realize he’s not coming back to stay right? El Salvador is sending back their citizen to face charges, then he will be deported.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is our military not going there to get this innocent man???????

He's not an innocent man. He was here illegally, found to be an MS-13 gang member twice. He had a hearing and an appeal. He was under court order to self-deport. He failed to do so. He is a citizen of El Salvador, not the U.S.. The gang he claimed to be threatened by if he returned to El Salvador no longer exists, nor does the overall situation in that country. His removal under US State Department Policy IS a military action and is not subject to judicial review. Understand?

Not one thing you said is true. Not a single one.

Oh, but how wrong you are.
Is it your contention he was here legally?
Is it your contention he is a US citizen?
Is it your contention he is not a citizen of El Salvador?

Everything you said is untrue...every single thing.

He went before an immigration judge in 2019 and was told he cannot be deported to Salvador based on the danger to his life in that country. So if he was to be deported, that was the one country, he was not supposed to be deported to.

So while he is not a US citizen and is yes, a citizen of El Salvador, he was in our country due to the danger to his life. And should not have been deported to that country.

Why shouldn't he be allowed to get due process which is part of the constitution! Remember that document? that is the biggest issue here he should've been given due process. He was snatched off the streets w/out an arrest warrant and then just sent to the one country he was not supposed to be sent to.

DP.

I agree with everything you said, but now what? Does the USA have the authority to force El Salvador to send him back?

Force El Salvador? lol. We’re paying them to keep him there. If we say release him, that’s all they need to hear. They said so themselves. What I’m wondering now is could another country like Canada agree to take him in if the US refuses to take him back? I can’t even believe I’m asking this question and I just am in disbelief what our country has become. It’s so sad.

We can not pay El Salvador to keep one of their citizens in jail. We have no authority to do so. He is in jail IN El Salvador because they want him in jail.

As far as the USA refusing to take him back, that’s already settled. He has a deportation order, he will not be coming back, as he has no right to be here. He was always going to be deported, that has not changed.

This aged poorly.

You realize he’s not coming back to stay right? El Salvador is sending back their citizen to face charges, then he will be deported.

At least he’ll get his day in court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is our military not going there to get this innocent man???????

He's not an innocent man. He was here illegally, found to be an MS-13 gang member twice. He had a hearing and an appeal. He was under court order to self-deport. He failed to do so. He is a citizen of El Salvador, not the U.S.. The gang he claimed to be threatened by if he returned to El Salvador no longer exists, nor does the overall situation in that country. His removal under US State Department Policy IS a military action and is not subject to judicial review. Understand?

Not one thing you said is true. Not a single one.

Oh, but how wrong you are.
Is it your contention he was here legally?
Is it your contention he is a US citizen?
Is it your contention he is not a citizen of El Salvador?

Everything you said is untrue...every single thing.

He went before an immigration judge in 2019 and was told he cannot be deported to Salvador based on the danger to his life in that country. So if he was to be deported, that was the one country, he was not supposed to be deported to.

So while he is not a US citizen and is yes, a citizen of El Salvador, he was in our country due to the danger to his life. And should not have been deported to that country.

Why shouldn't he be allowed to get due process which is part of the constitution! Remember that document? that is the biggest issue here he should've been given due process. He was snatched off the streets w/out an arrest warrant and then just sent to the one country he was not supposed to be sent to.

DP.

I agree with everything you said, but now what? Does the USA have the authority to force El Salvador to send him back?

Force El Salvador? lol. We’re paying them to keep him there. If we say release him, that’s all they need to hear. They said so themselves. What I’m wondering now is could another country like Canada agree to take him in if the US refuses to take him back? I can’t even believe I’m asking this question and I just am in disbelief what our country has become. It’s so sad.

We can not pay El Salvador to keep one of their citizens in jail. We have no authority to do so. He is in jail IN El Salvador because they want him in jail.

As far as the USA refusing to take him back, that’s already settled. He has a deportation order, he will not be coming back, as he has no right to be here. He was always going to be deported, that has not changed.

This aged poorly.

You realize he’s not coming back to stay right? El Salvador is sending back their citizen to face charges, then he will be deported.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is our military not going there to get this innocent man???????

He's not an innocent man. He was here illegally, found to be an MS-13 gang member twice. He had a hearing and an appeal. He was under court order to self-deport. He failed to do so. He is a citizen of El Salvador, not the U.S.. The gang he claimed to be threatened by if he returned to El Salvador no longer exists, nor does the overall situation in that country. His removal under US State Department Policy IS a military action and is not subject to judicial review. Understand?

Not one thing you said is true. Not a single one.

Oh, but how wrong you are.
Is it your contention he was here legally?
Is it your contention he is a US citizen?
Is it your contention he is not a citizen of El Salvador?

Everything you said is untrue...every single thing.

He went before an immigration judge in 2019 and was told he cannot be deported to Salvador based on the danger to his life in that country. So if he was to be deported, that was the one country, he was not supposed to be deported to.

So while he is not a US citizen and is yes, a citizen of El Salvador, he was in our country due to the danger to his life. And should not have been deported to that country.

Why shouldn't he be allowed to get due process which is part of the constitution! Remember that document? that is the biggest issue here he should've been given due process. He was snatched off the streets w/out an arrest warrant and then just sent to the one country he was not supposed to be sent to.

DP.

I agree with everything you said, but now what? Does the USA have the authority to force El Salvador to send him back?

Force El Salvador? lol. We’re paying them to keep him there. If we say release him, that’s all they need to hear. They said so themselves. What I’m wondering now is could another country like Canada agree to take him in if the US refuses to take him back? I can’t even believe I’m asking this question and I just am in disbelief what our country has become. It’s so sad.

We can not pay El Salvador to keep one of their citizens in jail. We have no authority to do so. He is in jail IN El Salvador because they want him in jail.

As far as the USA refusing to take him back, that’s already settled. He has a deportation order, he will not be coming back, as he has no right to be here. He was always going to be deported, that has not changed.

This aged poorly.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia will be returned to the United States to face criminal charges, law enforcement source says
https://www.cnn.com/

This is the current status of the Abrego Garcia case. Looks like it’s still with Judge Xinis.

- The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a ruling on April 16, 2025, upheld Judge Xinis’s order, rejecting the government’s appeal and emphasizing that Abrego Garcia’s due process rights must be respected, regardless of allegations against him.
- The district court is continuing to monitor compliance through discovery and depositions. Judge Xinis’s orders suggest she may impose further sanctions or remedies if the government fails to act.
- The Trump administration could appeal further to the Supreme Court or continue to argue that facilitating Abrego Garcia’s return is beyond its authority, potentially escalating the legal standoff.
- No specific timeline for Abrego Garcia’s release or return has been established, and his detention in El Salvador persists.

Anonymous wrote:Even the owner of this site gets the details wrong. Show me where in the Supreme Court opinion they said Trump had to facilitate this guy's return to the US?

The Supreme Court decision regarding Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was issued on April 10, 2025, in the case *Department of Homeland Security v. Abrego Garcia*


The Supreme Court's order was an unsigned per curiam opinion, and the primary operative language is as follows:

"The application for a stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted in part and denied in part. The order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland entered April 4, 2025, as modified April 10, 2025, is stayed insofar as it sets a deadline of April 7, 2025, at 11:59 p.m., for the Government to effectuate respondent Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States. That deadline having passed, the stay of that deadline is of no further effect. The district court order properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term 'effectuate' in the district court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the district court’s authority. The district court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. The Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps. The application is otherwise denied."

The official Supreme Court document is available on the Supreme Court’s website under the "Opinions Relating to Orders" section for the 2024 Term. The direct link to the PDF of the order is:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/041025zr2_7l48.pdf

This document is hosted on the official Supreme Court website (www.supremecourt.gov) and contains the full text of the order, including the per curiam opinion and Justice Sotomayor’s concurring statement.

Even the owner of this site gets the details wrong. Show me where in the Supreme Court opinion they said Trump had to facilitate this guy's return to the US?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

All this shows is that the author along with Democrats think certain things are false. The author states them to be false and that this looks bad for Republicans.

Prove it in court or STFU.

Prove what? He is a citizen of El Salvador and came here illegally. Those are facts, nothing to "prove" there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is happening with this, and all the other people sent down there that should not have been.

Except for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who has received a lot of attention, the plight of the others deported with him is unknown due to lack of transparency on the part of the US and Salvadoran governments. CBS News published a list of 238 Venezuelan deportees’ names, which has become an unofficial guide, but there's no single source of real-time stats on what's happening with these folks. Our government doesn't feel they owe anyone an answer as to the status or welfare of the deportees, including to the families of the deported.

Regarding pending cases, there are at least these two:

*Garcia's case referred to as Abrego Garcia v. Trump which is being handled by U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis and focuses on Garcia’s individual deportation in violation of a 2019 court order, with ongoing proceedings about his return to the U.S. The latest on that is that on May 9 (today) the Trump administration is due to submit sworn testimony and documents by 6 p.m. to detail efforts to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, as ordered by Xinis. Xinis also set May 12 for renewed motions based on these submissions, potentially addressing contempt or sanctions if non-compliance persists.

*A class-action lawsuit brought by the ACLU, J.G.G. v. Trump, handled by Judge James Boasberg, which addresses the broader deportation of ~137 Venezuelan migrants which does not include Garcia (but includes people like Andry, the gay makeup artist). As of May 9, a joint motion to govern future proceedings is filed in the D.C. Circuit appeal (25-5067), indicating ongoing litigation. Boasberg has not dismissed the case or dissolved his contempt probe, despite the administration’s requests post the Supreme Court ruling. The case awaits the administration’s May 14 submission and further rulings on jurisdiction and contempt.

Thank you. I can’t stop thinking about the idea of being stuck in that prison with no way to prove my way out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

All this shows is that the author along with Democrats think certain things are false. The author states them to be false and that this looks bad for Republicans.

Prove it in court or STFU.

Anonymous wrote:What is happening with this, and all the other people sent down there that should not have been.

Except for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who has received a lot of attention, the plight of the others deported with him is unknown due to lack of transparency on the part of the US and Salvadoran governments. CBS News published a list of 238 Venezuelan deportees’ names, which has become an unofficial guide, but there's no single source of real-time stats on what's happening with these folks. Our government doesn't feel they owe anyone an answer as to the status or welfare of the deportees, including to the families of the deported.

Regarding pending cases, there are at least these two:

*Garcia's case referred to as Abrego Garcia v. Trump which is being handled by U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis and focuses on Garcia’s individual deportation in violation of a 2019 court order, with ongoing proceedings about his return to the U.S. The latest on that is that on May 9 (today) the Trump administration is due to submit sworn testimony and documents by 6 p.m. to detail efforts to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, as ordered by Xinis. Xinis also set May 12 for renewed motions based on these submissions, potentially addressing contempt or sanctions if non-compliance persists.

*A class-action lawsuit brought by the ACLU, J.G.G. v. Trump, handled by Judge James Boasberg, which addresses the broader deportation of ~137 Venezuelan migrants which does not include Garcia (but includes people like Andry, the gay makeup artist). As of May 9, a joint motion to govern future proceedings is filed in the D.C. Circuit appeal (25-5067), indicating ongoing litigation. Boasberg has not dismissed the case or dissolved his contempt probe, despite the administration’s requests post the Supreme Court ruling. The case awaits the administration’s May 14 submission and further rulings on jurisdiction and contempt.

What is happening with this, and all the other people sent down there that should not have been.

Anonymous wrote:

All this shows is that the author along with Democrats think certain things are false. The author states them to be false and that this looks bad for Republicans.