Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

If it costs money to vote, it's a tax to vote.

NOPE.

Do you think saying it in all caps somehow makes it true? You cannot make it cost money to vote. End of story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

If it costs money to vote, it's a tax to vote.

NOPE.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

Do you need to be a US citizen to drive a car, buy liquor or see a doctor?

No?

Then not the same ID.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

An ID that can be used to buy liquor or open a bank account is not the same as an ID that establishes citizenship. How hard is that to understand?

Social Security cards and Medicaid both require ID similar to the SAVE Act.

Great! Make it free and easy to obtain (ie not a multi day, take time off from work) process and the Dems would be on board.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

What kind of logical leap is this? The American education system truly has failed.

It does not matter what people spend their money on. You cannot make it cost money to vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

An ID that can be used to buy liquor or open a bank account is not the same as an ID that establishes citizenship. How hard is that to understand?

Social Security cards and Medicaid both require ID similar to the SAVE Act.

If it costs money to vote, it is a poll tax. Poll taxes are illegal. Your right to vote is constitutionally guaranteed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

What part of No Poll Taxes Allowed do you not understand? You cannot make it cost money to vote. Voting is a constitutionally guaranteed right. Buying liquor or flying on a plane are not constitutionally guaranteed rights.

Rep. Mike Rounds says Republicans just want to make you show your document with a yellow star in order to vote

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mf3jeuseu72a


Is this a parody?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

A lot of people don't drink and don't fly. A lot of people don't own cars or drive. If you don't know this, you are in a bubble.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

An ID that can be used to buy liquor or open a bank account is not the same as an ID that establishes citizenship. How hard is that to understand?

Social Security cards and Medicaid both require ID similar to the SAVE Act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

An ID that can be used to buy liquor or open a bank account is not the same as an ID that establishes citizenship. How hard is that to understand?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

If it costs money to vote, it's a tax to vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

So, they don't buy liquor. They don't go to the doctor. They don't fly. They don't drive. They don't go to concerts. Probably don't have a bank account or a credit card--but they vote?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

If you are so confident, let the Supreme Court decide

the same supreme court that declared trump above the law? no thanks

vOtEr fRAuD

Back in November, DHS found one—a “criminal alien” who voted despite not being a US citizen. As it turns out, he was a green card holder who voted for Donald Trump—three times. Indeed, every documentable vote fraud case so far involves a fraudster voting for Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/16/us/kansas-mayor-vote-immigration.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share