Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
Kids leaving Ross, Brent, and Maury would mean more open seats for kids who want to actually want to attend Ross, Brent, and Maury. That’s not a bad thing.
That's not the point. The point is BASIS is intending to locate in an area that already has pretty good elementary schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
Kids leaving Ross, Brent, and Maury would mean more open seats for kids who want to actually want to attend Ross, Brent, and Maury. That’s not a bad thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
Kids leaving Ross, Brent, and Maury would mean more open seats for kids who want to actually want to attend Ross, Brent, and Maury. That’s not a bad thing.
Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
This. Good post summing up this state of affairs up. There's no sound logic here, no smart planning with a bird's eye view of what DC most needs. Everybody who criticizes the bad idea of a BASIS elementary school not far from the original building isn't in fact a parent without children at BASIS DC, or a sock puppet either. No, these are people following a logic that holds up under scrutiny, unlike our ed powers that be or BASIS higher-ups in Arizona with self-serving expansionist dreams.
There are 135 charter schools already in DC. Chose one.
Don’t pin this on BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I were dcpcsb I would have required them to offer prek. They could contract it out to appletree like rocketship, harmony, etc do, but allowing kids to do the full range of grades available in DC will allow the school to attract a wider group of families.
I don’t get why this would attract a wider group of families. Isn’t it pretty common for kids to move schools after preK?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I were dcpcsb I would have required them to offer prek. They could contract it out to appletree like rocketship, harmony, etc do, but allowing kids to do the full range of grades available in DC will allow the school to attract a wider group of families.
I don’t get why this would attract a wider group of families. Isn’t it pretty common for kids to move schools after preK?
Anonymous wrote:If I were dcpcsb I would have required them to offer prek. They could contract it out to appletree like rocketship, harmony, etc do, but allowing kids to do the full range of grades available in DC will allow the school to attract a wider group of families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
This. Good post summing up this state of affairs up. There's no sound logic here, no smart planning with a bird's eye view of what DC most needs. Everybody who criticizes the bad idea of a BASIS elementary school not far from the original building isn't in fact a parent without children at BASIS DC, or a sock puppet either. No, these are people following a logic that holds up under scrutiny, unlike our ed powers that be or BASIS higher-ups in Arizona with self-serving expansionist dreams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid at BASIS now, and another one at a Montessori elementary school. I cannot imagine having an elementary school experience that is as rigid as BASIS. I think that would suck all the joy out of learning far too early.
Do your research.
They don’t run their ES like they do MS and HS.
Who is "they" - BASIS corporate? Because I am familiar with how the DC BASIS administration runs its MS/HS. There's nothing wrong with the BASIS model. There are, however, distinct downsides to how the BASIS model is implemented in DC (weak admin, inexperienced teachers, crappy building, etc.). There are some very real consequences to those weaknesses, like poor quality teaching (at times), lack of extracurriculars, arbitrary decision-making and an overly harsh atmosphere.
It is because I have seen how BASIS DC runs its MS/HS that I would not send an elementary school kid to BASIS.
You are “familiar” with the Basis model? How so?
By having multiple children attending their school over a period of years.
You have had multiple children attend a Basis elementary school over a period of years?
You understand that teaching at an elementary school is different than middle school and high school, right?
You are clearly either stupid or have no kids at BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:The question to me isn't "What would make BASIS middle and high school even better?" Or "What would be easiest for BASIS (cookie cutter schools I guess)?" The question is what does DC most need, for our limited supply of school buildings and our limited number of kids to attend those schools. And I would say DC has pretty decent elementary schools in the areas BASIS is willing to locate, to the point where another elementary school is not a pressing need. If BASIS were willing to make a firm commitment to opening in a Ward 7 or 8 location that would be different. Or if BASIS were looking for a building to expand the enrollment of their existing program, that would be different, because we certainly do need more quality middle and high school seats. The idea of an elementary school to rescue those poor children who are currently attending.. Ross and Brent and Maury... just doesn't move me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid at BASIS now, and another one at a Montessori elementary school. I cannot imagine having an elementary school experience that is as rigid as BASIS. I think that would suck all the joy out of learning far too early.
Do your research.
They don’t run their ES like they do MS and HS.
Who is "they" - BASIS corporate? Because I am familiar with how the DC BASIS administration runs its MS/HS. There's nothing wrong with the BASIS model. There are, however, distinct downsides to how the BASIS model is implemented in DC (weak admin, inexperienced teachers, crappy building, etc.). There are some very real consequences to those weaknesses, like poor quality teaching (at times), lack of extracurriculars, arbitrary decision-making and an overly harsh atmosphere.
It is because I have seen how BASIS DC runs its MS/HS that I would not send an elementary school kid to BASIS.
You are “familiar” with the Basis model? How so?
By having multiple children attending their school over a period of years.
You have had multiple children attend a Basis elementary school over a period of years?
You understand that teaching at an elementary school is different than middle school and high school, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid at BASIS now, and another one at a Montessori elementary school. I cannot imagine having an elementary school experience that is as rigid as BASIS. I think that would suck all the joy out of learning far too early.
Do your research.
They don’t run their ES like they do MS and HS.
Who is "they" - BASIS corporate? Because I am familiar with how the DC BASIS administration runs its MS/HS. There's nothing wrong with the BASIS model. There are, however, distinct downsides to how the BASIS model is implemented in DC (weak admin, inexperienced teachers, crappy building, etc.). There are some very real consequences to those weaknesses, like poor quality teaching (at times), lack of extracurriculars, arbitrary decision-making and an overly harsh atmosphere.
It is because I have seen how BASIS DC runs its MS/HS that I would not send an elementary school kid to BASIS.
You are “familiar” with the Basis model? How so?
By having multiple children attending their school over a period of years.