Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Are you kidding? They didn’t know what shoe print they were looking for that night.
Also, Furman jumped the gate because they had just seen the owner of the house, Oj - his ex was just butchered, so he followed the blood in his driveway (the reason he jumped the fence). Furman, by your theory was jumping the fence to sprinkle blood.
Oj, had flown to Chicago that night, so he hadn’t given up his blood yet.
Furman couldn’t of set him up even if he wanted too

Furhman was not supposed to jump the gate. Warrants are needed for a reason. Also, the LAPD’s crime scene photos from that week didn’t show the glove or sock or any of the OJ bloody evidence the prosecution used. That means these items were planted later on after OJ was arrested and got blood drawn.

Why would the glove not be in the LAPD’s crime scene photo from the week of June 12th?

Not if it is reasonable to assume a crime is or has taken place. All that blood and two dead bodies do not require a warrant.

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown

Anonymous wrote:Why did OJ put out that book?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Are you kidding? They didn’t know what shoe print they were looking for that night.
Also, Furman jumped the gate because they had just seen the owner of the house, Oj - his ex was just butchered, so he followed the blood in his driveway (the reason he jumped the fence). Furman, by your theory was jumping the fence to sprinkle blood.
Oj, had flown to Chicago that night, so he hadn’t given up his blood yet.
Furman couldn’t of set him up even if he wanted too

Furhman was not supposed to jump the gate. Warrants are needed for a reason. Also, the LAPD’s crime scene photos from that week didn’t show the glove or sock or any of the OJ bloody evidence the prosecution used. That means these items were planted later on after OJ was arrested and got blood drawn.

Why would the glove not be in the LAPD’s crime scene photo from the week of June 12th?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Are you kidding? They didn’t know what shoe print they were looking for that night.
Also, Furman jumped the gate because they had just seen the owner of the house, Oj - his ex was just butchered, so he followed the blood in his driveway (the reason he jumped the fence). Furman, by your theory was jumping the fence to sprinkle blood.
Oj, had flown to Chicago that night, so he hadn’t given up his blood yet.
Furman couldn’t of set him up even if he wanted too

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Shooting to wake up the neighborhood? That’s a bird call to police. That’s what dumb gangbangers do: shoot.

Cartels do stab . It may even have been mistaken identity and they thought Nicole was Faye.

No evidence supports cartel family - also, they could shoot with a silencer and not wake up neighborhood. Every body language expert has said he was lying too.

Oj also said to lady I who wrote vanity article, ‘let’s say Ibsid do it, it would have to be because I loved her much, right? An innocent person doesn’t talk like this

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Shooting to wake up the neighborhood? That’s a bird call to police. That’s what dumb gangbangers do: shoot.

Cartels do stab . It may even have been mistaken identity and they thought Nicole was Faye.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why she chose to stay with him, then marry him, then have kids with him is beyond me. She just have really liked that football money lifestyle.

Of course he killed her or had her killed but he was clearly at the crime scene.

Let’s not victim blame. Yes, his money and fame clearly come into play because she wouldn’t have even talked to him to start if he was some broke hobo who was married with three kids. She was 18 when they met and started dating and enthralled by his fame and wealth and charisma. And like many victims, likely began to feel so bad about herself over time and so ashamed that she allowed someone to treat her like this, she stayed. Until she really thought she might die. And the worst of it is that is the most dangerous time for a victim of DV is after they leave, and after they set a boundary and the abuser loses their control. So really, a woman’s only hope is that she never even starts dating someone like this. It’s awful. He did it. Nothing she did or did not do caused it, and she couldn’t have changed it.

Anonymous wrote:Why she chose to stay with him, then marry him, then have kids with him is beyond me. She just have really liked that football money lifestyle.

Of course he killed her or had her killed but he was clearly at the crime scene.