Anonymous wrote:So to recap:
- AC Milan comes over to set up an academy in VA
- They subcontract out to Red and Black Pumas, LLC to run this academy
- The subcontractors mismanage the venture and end up firing most of the staff/coaches, or coaches leave on their own accord - questions about money are swirling
- The two subcontracting business partners fall out and one sues the other citing mismanagement of money
- AC Milan (Italy) cuts ties with the one subcontracting partner left standing (the defendant) and enters into a new subcontract with the other business partner (the plaintiff)
- Meanwhile, AC Milan (Italy) is telling families that although they will honor the upcoming spring season for any families who wish to stay (with no concrete answers to logistics on what league they will play in, who will coach and what fields are available for training), they cannot discuss any refunds for families who choose to exit the club because Subcontracting Business Partner #1 (Defendant) has all of the money that has been paid for the year and they no longer have a business relationship with this person.
So this guy has all of the money that all of the families have paid for the year, delivered 1/2 of a full travel season and is just keeping the other 1/2?????? Make it make sense - and why would AC Milan (Italy) not be on the hook to refund this money to the families?? It was their job to manage their subcontractor.
Because Italian football clubs, even the big names, are tin pot clubs. Look at how they conduct their transfer business.
"We will give you 15 eggs, €400.37, and an option to buy for €10,000 for a loan of your player valued at €50 million. And you pay all of his salary whilst on loan to us."