Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has gone too far when people are conjecturing about how they afford their lifestyle. FYI - Tesla's can cost less than a Jeep.
Stop it with the nanny language police.
And you make no sense. "Teslas can cost less than a Jeep." Uh, ok, and both still are a financial stretch for a fed, a nurse and a family with expensive in home childcare. Never mind when ONE EARNER IS NOW DEAD, cutting income significantly.
I think it "went too far" when BB and au pair started swanning around like "the last of the real ones" IRL in public and on socials, not to mention it was WAY TOO FAR when 2 human beings were MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD, but that's just me. Gossip about the neighbor's stuff and what it costs? It's called keeping up with the Joneses!
I don't think you know how much things cost and how much these people make. A PICU nurse probably makes $100K. A GS-15 probably makes $175. A Tesla costs $35K, and if he's leasing it, it's maybe $300/month. The Au pair costs maybe $1500/month (cheaper than daycare). His mortgage (inc. tax and insurance) is probably less than $3500 a month. He could easily afford these things even on his salary alone.
BS. My husband is a GS15 and although he makes about 184k/year, he brings home only about 7200k/month - net, after taxes, 401k, flex spending, etc.
Out mortgage is $2100k/month, but that is only because we had inheritance money to pay a bigger down payment (our house is worth about 900k, in Reston and when we bought it, it cost us 675k, with about 50% down payment).
No way we could have afford an aupair, a preschool tuition, student loan, tesla car payment, etc only on his salary alone.
Sorry you can't manage your money well. The truth is, we don't know anything about their financial situation - maybe their parents helped them buy the house, maybe his parents are helping him continue to pay for the au pair or the mortgage on his house. Maybe they did really well in the stock market (we own stock in Tesla, it's increased by 1000% since we bought it). Maybe he inherited money from his grandparents. You have no idea, but clearly he CAN afford to stay there.
Sorry you can't manage your money well
Why would you even post this? This thread is heavy on the contempt trolling. Brendan and Juliana are not the only twisted people in the DMV.
PP, thanks for sharing some actual IRL numbers.
You have no idea, but clearly he CAN afford to stay there.
No, YOU have no idea of his finances, you are also just speculating. like other posters. It's not clear to anyone that he can afford to stay, he could be on the verge of bankruptcy for all we know and unless you are his accountant, that includes you. He could be living it up knowing a cage is likely in his future. We are all just guessing. Have you never heard of the concept of people living beyond their means?
The good taxpayers of the state of VA are on the hook for Juliana Peres Magalhaes, hopefully that will include Brendan Banfield very soon. It's possible he would have relocated back to Long Island but was told to stay in the area, we have no idea. It's very likely that he is or soon will be on leave as an FBI agent, does that reality get past your smug know it all mindset? Not to mention, cough, unemployable in LE, cough.
Do you see how mean and silly you are acting? It's like all the posters thinking he's pulling in $150k+ when a few years ago he was making $68k. Other people's IRL experiences have value too, not just your mean girl attitudes and everyone is speculating.
How they could go about their lives, splurge on new cars, go out to dinner, having held a gun and killed a man in cold blood and having brutally stabbed your wife and the mother of your child to DEATH, you know, the likely co-owner of the house, is beyond me.
I literally said: The truth is, we don't know anything about their financial situation, so yeah, obviously and clearly speculating. You have no idea.
Sorry you can't manage your money well
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The husband doesn't appear very smart, but I'll give him some credit in the sense that this case doesn't seem to have been particularly easy for law enforcement.
What did the husband do for a living? Appears from the house and the au pair and everything else they were well off enough. Did Christine work?
Husband is/was FBI, Christine was a nurse. Seems like lifestyle would be a stretch on one income. Don't think he came from $, not sure about her. Even on fed/nurse income seems a bit of a stretch, but little girl started school this year so childcare costs almost over.
Not especially well off for this area, middle class. AP may have worked best for child care due to shift work.
If he's a GS-15, he's making at least $170. He had maybe a $600K mortgage at 2.75% interest. Easily affordable on that salary.
Why do you think he's a GS15? (not being snarky, seriously curious)
Age and experience.
Public records show before he moved to DC he was making $63,743 as a tax compliance officer. That was 2018/9ish.
Doubt that increased by almost 100K in a few years but, who knows. They were not rolling in money nor do I think their parents with fed or LE backgrounds were wealthy and subsidizing them. If there were insurance policies on Christine, wonder if recent?
Dummies, an insurance company will not pay out if there is an active investigation surrounding the death of the insured. People speculating here are such idiots.
DP. People are speculating about insurance because it is a motive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has gone too far when people are conjecturing about how they afford their lifestyle. FYI - Tesla's can cost less than a Jeep.
Stop it with the nanny language police.
And you make no sense. "Teslas can cost less than a Jeep." Uh, ok, and both still are a financial stretch for a fed, a nurse and a family with expensive in home childcare. Never mind when ONE EARNER IS NOW DEAD, cutting income significantly.
I think it "went too far" when BB and au pair started swanning around like "the last of the real ones" IRL in public and on socials, not to mention it was WAY TOO FAR when 2 human beings were MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD, but that's just me. Gossip about the neighbor's stuff and what it costs? It's called keeping up with the Joneses!
I don't think you know how much things cost and how much these people make. A PICU nurse probably makes $100K. A GS-15 probably makes $175. A Tesla costs $35K, and if he's leasing it, it's maybe $300/month. The Au pair costs maybe $1500/month (cheaper than daycare). His mortgage (inc. tax and insurance) is probably less than $3500 a month. He could easily afford these things even on his salary alone.
BS. My husband is a GS15 and although he makes about 184k/year, he brings home only about 7200k/month - net, after taxes, 401k, flex spending, etc.
Out mortgage is $2100k/month, but that is only because we had inheritance money to pay a bigger down payment (our house is worth about 900k, in Reston and when we bought it, it cost us 675k, with about 50% down payment).
No way we could have afford an aupair, a preschool tuition, student loan, tesla car payment, etc only on his salary alone.
Sorry you can't manage your money well. The truth is, we don't know anything about their financial situation - maybe their parents helped them buy the house, maybe his parents are helping him continue to pay for the au pair or the mortgage on his house. Maybe they did really well in the stock market (we own stock in Tesla, it's increased by 1000% since we bought it). Maybe he inherited money from his grandparents. You have no idea, but clearly he CAN afford to stay there.
Sorry you can't manage your money well
Why would you even post this? This thread is heavy on the contempt trolling. Brendan and Juliana are not the only twisted people in the DMV.
PP, thanks for sharing some actual IRL numbers.
You have no idea, but clearly he CAN afford to stay there.
No, YOU have no idea of his finances, you are also just speculating. like other posters. It's not clear to anyone that he can afford to stay, he could be on the verge of bankruptcy for all we know and unless you are his accountant, that includes you. He could be living it up knowing a cage is likely in his future. We are all just guessing. Have you never heard of the concept of people living beyond their means?
The good taxpayers of the state of VA are on the hook for Juliana Peres Magalhaes, hopefully that will include Brendan Banfield very soon. It's possible he would have relocated back to Long Island but was told to stay in the area, we have no idea. It's very likely that he is or soon will be on leave as an FBI agent, does that reality get past your smug know it all mindset? Not to mention, cough, unemployable in LE, cough.
Do you see how mean and silly you are acting? It's like all the posters thinking he's pulling in $150k+ when a few years ago he was making $68k. Other people's IRL experiences have value too, not just your mean girl attitudes and everyone is speculating.
How they could go about their lives, splurge on new cars, go out to dinner, having held a gun and killed a man in cold blood and having brutally stabbed your wife and the mother of your child to DEATH, you know, the likely co-owner of the house, is beyond me.
Anonymous wrote:There are so many aspects of this case and situation that are just shocking. How depraved do you have to be to be able to live in that house after you were responsible for someone being brutally stabbed there (with body moved) and someone else being shot multiple times and dying there?
How does this work - who cleans up this mess? Some sort of professional company? And then do BB and AP just walk around and live in the areas in the house where poor Christine and Joe were mortally wounded? Who does that?!??
I hope justice is served and BB and AP are locked up for a very long time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A possible scenario:
Husband is having affair with AP and knows that it will be too costly to get a divorce b/c he doesn't want to lose half of his pension and sell the house. He wants to have the AP, but doesn't want to pay the price of a divorce. He encourages wife to have her own extra-curricular activities so that he can justify his relationship with AP. Husband and wife have an understanding that they will each do their own thing with their own partners.
Husband knows AP will have to go back and he's tired to having the wife around anyway. So, he decides to set up a scenario where he stabs the wife to death, then arranges for the AP to frame the boyfriend.... in a way that they are both dead and it looks like one killed the other. Husband kills the wife, arranges for boyfriend to come over and find her. AP is ready and waiting to shoot the boyfriend as he checks on the non-responsive wife. AP shoots boyfriend, then is supposed to put the gun in the deceased wife's hand -- making it look like the wife shot the boyfriend as he was trying to stab her to death.
That's why the AP was calling 911 and saying that her friend was hurt. Apparently AP couldn't or wouldn't put the gun into the scene of death. So, husband had to call 911 to say that he shot someone as though it was an intruder.
You know that as a law enforcement officer, husband was figuring out a way to make this look like a murder/self-defense situation.
And basically, it comes down to money... men who want to divorce their wives, but don't want to share the assets. So, they decide the way to keep all their money/pensions/assets is to kill off the wife. It's not the first time this type of scenario has been in the news (although their usually isn't a boyfriend involved).
Hmmm…this doesn’t seem impossible to me. It’s entirely speculative but I like it.
Anonymous wrote:Uuuummmm did anyone watch the fall out boy video? The video is literally two people burning evidence before they brutally murder someone. Just, uh, throwing that out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The husband doesn't appear very smart, but I'll give him some credit in the sense that this case doesn't seem to have been particularly easy for law enforcement.
What did the husband do for a living? Appears from the house and the au pair and everything else they were well off enough. Did Christine work?
Husband is/was FBI, Christine was a nurse. Seems like lifestyle would be a stretch on one income. Don't think he came from $, not sure about her. Even on fed/nurse income seems a bit of a stretch, but little girl started school this year so childcare costs almost over.
Not especially well off for this area, middle class. AP may have worked best for child care due to shift work.
If he's a GS-15, he's making at least $170. He had maybe a $600K mortgage at 2.75% interest. Easily affordable on that salary.
Why do you think he's a GS15? (not being snarky, seriously curious)
Age and experience.
Public records show before he moved to DC he was making $63,743 as a tax compliance officer. That was 2018/9ish.
Doubt that increased by almost 100K in a few years but, who knows. They were not rolling in money nor do I think their parents with fed or LE backgrounds were wealthy and subsidizing them. If there were insurance policies on Christine, wonder if recent?
Dummies, an insurance company will not pay out if there is an active investigation surrounding the death of the insured. People speculating here are such idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The husband doesn't appear very smart, but I'll give him some credit in the sense that this case doesn't seem to have been particularly easy for law enforcement.
What did the husband do for a living? Appears from the house and the au pair and everything else they were well off enough. Did Christine work?
Husband is/was FBI, Christine was a nurse. Seems like lifestyle would be a stretch on one income. Don't think he came from $, not sure about her. Even on fed/nurse income seems a bit of a stretch, but little girl started school this year so childcare costs almost over.
Not especially well off for this area, middle class. AP may have worked best for child care due to shift work.
If he's a GS-15, he's making at least $170. He had maybe a $600K mortgage at 2.75% interest. Easily affordable on that salary.
Why do you think he's a GS15? (not being snarky, seriously curious)
Age and experience.
Public records show before he moved to DC he was making $63,743 as a tax compliance officer. That was 2018/9ish.
Doubt that increased by almost 100K in a few years but, who knows. They were not rolling in money nor do I think their parents with fed or LE backgrounds were wealthy and subsidizing them. If there were insurance policies on Christine, wonder if recent?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The husband doesn't appear very smart, but I'll give him some credit in the sense that this case doesn't seem to have been particularly easy for law enforcement.
What did the husband do for a living? Appears from the house and the au pair and everything else they were well off enough. Did Christine work?
Husband is/was FBI, Christine was a nurse. Seems like lifestyle would be a stretch on one income. Don't think he came from $, not sure about her. Even on fed/nurse income seems a bit of a stretch, but little girl started school this year so childcare costs almost over.
Not especially well off for this area, middle class. AP may have worked best for child care due to shift work.
If he's a GS-15, he's making at least $170. He had maybe a $600K mortgage at 2.75% interest. Easily affordable on that salary.
Why do you think he's a GS15? (not being snarky, seriously curious)
Age and experience.
If he's a new FBI SA, he's probably a GS-10.
BB is IRS not fbi
Anonymous wrote:The w lesson here is "be nice to your au pair," or better still, "you get what you pay for!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they haven't charged anyone with the wife's murder, then Ryan did it.
The many times LE said it's an ongoing investigation were not suggestive of someone else to you?
The au pair is not overcharged and held to incentivize her to flip on Joe.
If they thought Joe did it they would say so, lots of forensics back.
Instead, from the time of their deaths, LE has consistently referred to both Joe and Christine as VICTIMS.
Who else was there?
DP, the other thing that sticks out is that she was charged with second-degree and not manslaughter. If she were defending herself and Christine from Joe’s, stabbing/threatening/etc., it would likely have been manslaughter. Second degree indicates, although not premeditated, time to think about the actions.
Anonymous wrote:A possible scenario:
Husband is having affair with AP and knows that it will be too costly to get a divorce b/c he doesn't want to lose half of his pension and sell the house. He wants to have the AP, but doesn't want to pay the price of a divorce. He encourages wife to have her own extra-curricular activities so that he can justify his relationship with AP. Husband and wife have an understanding that they will each do their own thing with their own partners.
Husband knows AP will have to go back and he's tired to having the wife around anyway. So, he decides to set up a scenario where he stabs the wife to death, then arranges for the AP to frame the boyfriend.... in a way that they are both dead and it looks like one killed the other. Husband kills the wife, arranges for boyfriend to come over and find her. AP is ready and waiting to shoot the boyfriend as he checks on the non-responsive wife. AP shoots boyfriend, then is supposed to put the gun in the deceased wife's hand -- making it look like the wife shot the boyfriend as he was trying to stab her to death.
That's why the AP was calling 911 and saying that her friend was hurt. Apparently AP couldn't or wouldn't put the gun into the scene of death. So, husband had to call 911 to say that he shot someone as though it was an intruder.
You know that as a law enforcement officer, husband was figuring out a way to make this look like a murder/self-defense situation.
And basically, it comes down to money... men who want to divorce their wives, but don't want to share the assets. So, they decide the way to keep all their money/pensions/assets is to kill off the wife. It's not the first time this type of scenario has been in the news (although their usually isn't a boyfriend involved).