Anonymous wrote:Please look at state/national PTA bylaws, there are MANY and they are extensive. I am a first year PTA treasurer and it’s intense! All monies must go to benefit all children etc many many rules on how PTA monies can be spent.
Sponsoring a sister school is the best way to promote equity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please look at state/national PTA bylaws, there are MANY and they are extensive. I am a first year PTA treasurer and it’s intense! All monies must go to benefit all children etc many many rules on how PTA monies can be spent.
Sponsoring a sister school is the best way to promote equity.
Why not directly promote equity through an equal redistribution?
Anonymous wrote:Please look at state/national PTA bylaws, there are MANY and they are extensive. I am a first year PTA treasurer and it’s intense! All monies must go to benefit all children etc many many rules on how PTA monies can be spent.
Sponsoring a sister school is the best way to promote equity.
Anonymous wrote:The OP is insanely jealous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our PTA has minimal involvement. It's a high farms school and the meeting times are hard for many families. Also, I get the sense that the principal is hard to work with and she and the staff dominate the meetings. There are not enough interested people to run and I also get the sense that it was never a priority of the principal because zero flyers have been sent home, we get a link to the meeting very last minute, etc. At the start of last year, over 80 people joined in on the initial meeting but because there was no organization and most of the positions were unfilled from last year, at the next meeting only 20 attended and by the next one there were maybe 12 with most of that being staff members.
Communication with families is a huge issue. We cannot communicate without the school sending emails/text and often it doesn't get done nor does anything get advertised so even though several people are trying, it normally is pretty low attendance. Ours is mostly staff too.
Anonymous wrote:Np here who was involved in a high-FARMs school’s PTA.
I want to correct the notion that these PTAs are struggling because the families are poor. To be sure, the families don’t have huge amounts of disposable income to donate to their local PTA, but that isn’t the root of the matter, IMO.
Many kids in these schools have parents who weren’t born in the US, and did not have anything like a PTA in their own childhood. (My friend whose parents were immigrant engineers —and heavily invested in their kids’ academic success—said that this was the case for her parents back in the 70s, too.) The PTAs (including local and state/national) also do very little, if anything, to explain to these new-American families why the PTA is something they should care about or join. It’s an American “institution”, if you will, which is why US-raised parents join their PTAs when their kids start school.
So PTAs suffer from a lack of buy-in/membership.
Anonymous wrote:The OP is insanely jealous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When my kid was little, there was no tutor. It was me and a book at night, or a phone app/game.
Yes, there are special opportunities if you have all the money in the world. Yes, life isn't fair. But either play the lottery or go work 10x harder finding your kid resources. And it's not like it's difficult. MCPS is advertising weekend tutoring, afterschool tutoring, free programs all the time. If you're kid isn't doing them, don't blame the school, don't blame the teachers, or the other parents.
Point the finger at yourself, because expending all your energy whining on this website ain't gonna do much.
I work two low-wage jobs just to provide and can't arrange for these things on my own. People with privilege just don't get it.
You had access to birth control and you could have decided not to have children. You have to own your choices, dear! People with privilege are very clear-eyed about the big picture so don't blame them.
Anonymous wrote:Schools in wealthy areas simply will get massive amounts more of funding from parents. The MCCPTA potentially could require that PTAs raising over a certain amount donate x percent to a fund that could go to schools raising below a certain amount - basically like paying tax. If done right, it might make wealthy PTAs feel good about themselves for helping those ‘poor schools’ while still allowing them to raise plenty to fund whatever they desire.