Anonymous wrote:If you’re looking just to the club to get your daughter or son to get your kid recruited, than it’s on you and your kid for failure.
Your kid needs to reach out to coaches. It’s up to your kid to follow up. It’s up to your kid to sell themselves via video of their play.
And remember, it’s up to the parents to keep their mouths shut on the sidelines, to not “coach” their kids via the sidelines and up to the parents to shut the F up as to the goings on on the fields. You can ruin it for your son/ daughter.
Anonymous wrote:If you’re looking just to the club to get your daughter or son to get your kid recruited, than it’s on you and your kid for failure.
Your kid needs to reach out to coaches. It’s up to your kid to follow up. It’s up to your kid to sell themselves via video of their play.
And remember, it’s up to the parents to keep their mouths shut on the sidelines, to not “coach” their kids via the sidelines and up to the parents to shut the F up as to the goings on on the fields. You can ruin it for your son/ daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Two more Capital 24 Blue commits. ND and Umass. The entire team is committed.
Anonymous wrote:ok, you got me there, maybe "garbage" to describe the US Club Rankings was to harsh of a term. However, I will tell you, that most college coaches doing this for a long time know the top elite clubs (producing talent) and have a relationship with them so they can easily make a phone call. Club rankings are really not the best format and the way it's calculated, is not great either. With that said, that doesn't mean that a college coach won't take interest in other players that play for lesser known clubs in areas that may not be hot beds for club lax. Coaches are always looking for that diamond in a rough and are proud of the fact that they can say they have "recruits" from all over the country from all different clubs. The one thing i will stress is this-- Every college program and coach recruits in different ways (yes there are similar tendencies), but for the most part recruiting is not an exact science, it also has a lot to do with the current class (money-if it's D1 or 2) program, future needs and the entire culture of the team. Coaches are looking for that right fit, and it has to work both ways for the student and the college program. I'll give everyone an example of what i mean about not an "exact" science. This is real world and actually happens more than you think, but coach plans to watch player A, and starts to randomly watch another game and see's player B. This scenario happens a lot because coaches cant be everywhere and they are trying to see as many games or players as they can.
All of this is my humble opinion based on coaching at that level for years. I also find these threads very interesting as someone told me to take a look last week. It amazes me all the bashing of players, coaches and other parents on this board, it's pretty disturbing. At the end of the day, lacrosse just like any other sport is a game, and their will be a time where the player loses interest or hangs up their cleats. We should be building these players up, not breaking them down and judging. I've said my piece, take it for what it's worth..... Have a great holiday everyone.
Anonymous wrote:As a former college lax coach at a D1 university, they don’t care about scores, who beat who. They don’t care about rankings because everyone knows us club lax rankings are garbage. They care about finding the right athlete or right fit for their program and want to see that athlete play in competitive games. Yes, we all know who the more well known powerhouse clubs are, and yes they tend to gravitate to those clubs sometimes first to watch players. This all depends if they have a shot at signing that player. Coaches also have to be realistic as to where they spend their time. For example, if Capital beats m&d, again, coaches don’t care, they want to evaluate the players for who they are plying against top competition. I myself and many other coaches have attended lopsided games and just got up and went to watch another one, because the kids we were looking at couldn’t really perform at the e level that the coaches wanted to see them perform because the competition was horrible. But not one coach came running up to other coaches and immediately started talking about score. Yes they will say it’s not worth watching because it’s a lopsided game, but no coaches care about the score.
Infact, not sure if this is true, but I heard some tournaments in the future if it’s just a showcase maynot even keep score or post it, because it doesn’t make sense when the athletes are their to perform the best they can. Keeping score also alters how the students play and again, coaches don’t want to see a stall or a team down by 3 goals frantically changing their style likes it’s the national championship and start forcing bad shots just to score.
Again, just my opinion and my over 12 years of coaching at that level.
I hope I did some Justice with this post but as I always say, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion.