Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Pretty sure the tax exemption is for the whole parcel, not just the part designated as the cemetery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Pretty sure the tax exemption is for the whole parcel, not just the part designated as the cemetery.
No, the tax exemption is just for the parcel dedicated as cemetery land. It won’t amount to much of tax difference at all. Please go look at the Code before you state you’re “pretty sure” about something. If you could put a few bodies on a big parcel of land and declare the entire parcel tax-free, we’d have bodies buried everywhere and no one would pay taxes.
My guess is they buried Ivana there because she died unexpectedly and they didn’t have anywhere else to bury her. They could have shopped for spaces elsewhere, but unless they had tied to a particular cemetery, it can be a time-consuming and difficult decision to make in a short period of time while you’re in shock and grieving. If this is intended to be a family burial plot, at least some of the kids may end up there and it makes sense that they’d want to bury her where they’ll be.
There’s plenty to criticize the Trumps for, this isn’t one of them.
OMG give me a break! People in their 70s, especially really rich ones, have probably made it known already where they would like to be buried (or scattered). Moreover, plenty of people die unexpectedly without their ex and kids being forced to inter them by the first hole of a Trump golf course! There is ZERO chance that they did this because there simply wasn't time for other arrangements for pete's sake. That is simply not credible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Pretty sure the tax exemption is for the whole parcel, not just the part designated as the cemetery.
No, the tax exemption is just for the parcel dedicated as cemetery land. It won’t amount to much of tax difference at all. Please go look at the Code before you state you’re “pretty sure” about something. If you could put a few bodies on a big parcel of land and declare the entire parcel tax-free, we’d have bodies buried everywhere and no one would pay taxes.
My guess is they buried Ivana there because she died unexpectedly and they didn’t have anywhere else to bury her. They could have shopped for spaces elsewhere, but unless they had tied to a particular cemetery, it can be a time-consuming and difficult decision to make in a short period of time while you’re in shock and grieving. If this is intended to be a family burial plot, at least some of the kids may end up there and it makes sense that they’d want to bury her where they’ll be.
There’s plenty to criticize the Trumps for, this isn’t one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Pretty sure the tax exemption is for the whole parcel, not just the part designated as the cemetery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
It’s a tiny plot. They’re not saving that much in taxes. I’m guessing the taxes saved are less than the attorney fees it took to dedicate this space as cemetery land. Seriously, it’s 10 plots, so around 300 square feet. The taxes on this small parcel are likely a rounding error for the golf course as a whole. And he created this cemetery in 2017, when there was no way to know that Ivana would be the first to need a burial.
I dislike Trump as much as anyone but it is amazing how hard people try to vilify him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.
Horrifying. Honestly it’s the lowest of the low and I can’t believe her kids let her be used like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of all the places to be buried, I just .. her ex-husband’s golf course?! Make it make sense.
It’s for tax avoidance. Can’t believe her next of kin allowed her to buried there and used for those purposes. Shameful.