Anonymous
02/17/2023 18:03
Subject: RW vs LW news
*producer
Anonymous
02/17/2023 18:03
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
I read what was posted. And, I see out of context texts posted by a left-wing "journalist" with his own biased commentary.
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
There are a plethora of programs there that are quite illuminating and full of news and void of commentary. And, they feature political commentary from the left and the right. That doesn't happen so much on other networks.
Hey here’s something else that “doesn’t happen so much on other networks”!
“After Fox broadcasted the now-infamous Giuliani and Powell press conference about Dominion, then-White House correspondent Kristen Fisher got in trouble for fact-checking their bogus claims.
Per the filing: “Fisher received a call from her boss, Bryan Boughton, immediately after in which he emphasized that higher-ups at Fox News were also unhappy with it, and that Fisher needed to do a better job of, this is a quote, respecting our audience.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/02/17/fox-news-split-screen-spills-into-view-00083407
Boughton is not Hannity, Ingraham or Carlson. Boughton is Fox News’s senior vice president and Washington bureau chief.
Wow, he was a legitimate produce back in the day.Sad to see him kowtow to the authoritarianism.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 17:36
Subject: RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:There is no "right wing news" anymore.
It's called propaganda
Not one "right wing" periodical article or whatever is truthful.
The NRO is ridiculous. WSJ is a rag. Brietbart omg absurd and anyone who follows Rufo substack, Mandels, watcher guru, or independent uk tells me you are dumb.
Yes. Let's talk propaganda. Here is a very good example of propaganda by Andrea Mitchell from MSNBC.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 17:14
Subject: RW vs LW news
There is no "right wing news" anymore.
It's called propaganda
Not one "right wing" periodical article or whatever is truthful.
The NRO is ridiculous. WSJ is a rag. Brietbart omg absurd and anyone who follows Rufo substack, Mandels, watcher guru, or independent uk tells me you are dumb.
It's called propaganda
Not one "right wing" periodical article or whatever is truthful.
The NRO is ridiculous. WSJ is a rag. Brietbart omg absurd and anyone who follows Rufo substack, Mandels, watcher guru, or independent uk tells me you are dumb.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 13:58
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
I read what was posted. And, I see out of context texts posted by a left-wing "journalist" with his own biased commentary.
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
There are a plethora of programs there that are quite illuminating and full of news and void of commentary. And, they feature political commentary from the left and the right. That doesn't happen so much on other networks.
Hey here’s something else that “doesn’t happen so much on other networks”!
“After Fox broadcasted the now-infamous Giuliani and Powell press conference about Dominion, then-White House correspondent Kristen Fisher got in trouble for fact-checking their bogus claims.
Per the filing: “Fisher received a call from her boss, Bryan Boughton, immediately after in which he emphasized that higher-ups at Fox News were also unhappy with it, and that Fisher needed to do a better job of, this is a quote, respecting our audience.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/02/17/fox-news-split-screen-spills-into-view-00083407
Boughton is not Hannity, Ingraham or Carlson. Boughton is Fox News’s senior vice president and Washington bureau chief.
Fisher knows what doesn’t happen on other networks.
Anonymous
Anonymous
02/17/2023 10:28
Subject: RW vs LW news
Right vs left is the false dichotomy Fox has used to distract you from the real dichotomy: journalism va propaganda.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 10:21
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
I read what was posted. And, I see out of context texts posted by a left-wing "journalist" with his own biased commentary.
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
There are a plethora of programs there that are quite illuminating and full of news and void of commentary. And, they feature political commentary from the left and the right. That doesn't happen so much on other networks.
Hey here’s something else that “doesn’t happen so much on other networks”!
“After Fox broadcasted the now-infamous Giuliani and Powell press conference about Dominion, then-White House correspondent Kristen Fisher got in trouble for fact-checking their bogus claims.
Per the filing: “Fisher received a call from her boss, Bryan Boughton, immediately after in which he emphasized that higher-ups at Fox News were also unhappy with it, and that Fisher needed to do a better job of, this is a quote, respecting our audience.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/02/17/fox-news-split-screen-spills-into-view-00083407
Boughton is not Hannity, Ingraham or Carlson. Boughton is Fox News’s senior vice president and Washington bureau chief.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 10:16
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
Here are the hourly ratings from Wednesday for Fox/CNN/MSNBC (I looked at several of these and this is a pretty typical day):
https://www.mediaite.com/daily-ratings/cable-news-ratings-wednesday-february-15-fox-news-beats-cnn-and-msnbc-combined-in-demo-and-total-viewers/
As you can see, CNN's viewership remains fairly steady throughout the day - while Fox and MSNBC have huge jumps between their afternoon news shows and evening opinion shows. Viewers - whether on the right or the left - seem to prefer opinion to news.
So while it's technically true that there is more to them than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham, they know who is bringing in their ad revenue.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 09:56
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
I read what was posted. And, I see out of context texts posted by a left-wing "journalist" with his own biased commentary.
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
There are a plethora of programs there that are quite illuminating and full of news and void of commentary. And, they feature political commentary from the left and the right. That doesn't happen so much on other networks.
Of course Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham. Fox is the executives who criticized Neil Cavuto for cutting off a Kayleigh McEnany press conference that was full of lies.
Fox is the executives who apologized to Mike Lindell.
Fox is Rupert Murdoch, who said the network should help the Republicans in the 2021 Georgia runoffs “in any way we can.”
Fox fired their political editor and multiple members of their Decision Desk staff - the election numbers crunchers - for CORRECTLY calling Arizona for Biden before anyone else did.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/fox-news-stirewalt-sammon-murdoch-arizona/2021/01/19/a54e9f72-5a8f-11eb-a976-bad6431e03e2_story.html
Anonymous
02/17/2023 09:38
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
I read what was posted. And, I see out of context texts posted by a left-wing "journalist" with his own biased commentary.
Perhaps you need to understand that Fox is more than Hannity or Carlson or Ingraham.
There are a plethora of programs there that are quite illuminating and full of news and void of commentary. And, they feature political commentary from the left and the right. That doesn't happen so much on other networks.
Anonymous
02/17/2023 09:34
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Hi, you need to read everything in the Fox Dominion lawsuit thread. TIA!
Anonymous
02/17/2023 09:32
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
They are much more legitimate than CNN or MSNBC. There is no comparison.
Both Carlson and Hannity will tell you that they have a bias to their programs. They are not straight news. They are commentators.
And, Jacqui Heinrich still works at Fox and was even promoted to WH correspondent after the election.
Fox has plenty of straight news programs. You would be hard pressed to find a straight news program on CNN or MSNBC, especially after the folly that was Russia-gate.
Anonymous