Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As I said a week ago, nobody knows nothin, including MLS Next. Their official recognition of it does however lead to a change in odds markets favoring SY.
1 & 2 BY: + 600 (prev + 200)
1 BY, 2 SY: + 180 ( prev + 200)
1 & 2 SY: + 140 ( prev + 200)
Knowing mlsn , it will be BY , with "grade-banding" lol
Anonymous wrote:As I said a week ago, nobody knows nothin, including MLS Next. Their official recognition of it does however lead to a change in odds markets favoring SY.
1 & 2 BY: + 600 (prev + 200)
1 BY, 2 SY: + 180 ( prev + 200)
1 & 2 SY: + 140 ( prev + 200)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.
You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?
Anonymous wrote:
This is official from Mls Next direction to our club. Our management forwarded to parents:
****
Dear MLS NEXT Member Clubs,
We know there has been a lot of discussion surrounding School Year vs Birth Year age groups and understand how important this decision is for your clubs as you plan for the 2026/27 season. We recognize the impact of this decision and are carefully evaluating all factors before determining the best path forward for MLS NEXT.
An official update will be shared with all clubs once the revies process is complete. We appreciate your paticne and continued partnership as we work to provide direction and clarity for all clubs.
Best,
MLS NEXT HQ
****
Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldnt they jsut say " No change" if they wernt changing?