The man is in jail for live. And that is where he shall remain. For life.

Anonymous wrote:When Laci went missing on December 24, 2002, she was 33 weeks pregnant (just over 7 1/2 months). You couldn’t find a family member or friend who thought Scott was involved in her disappearance. Laci’s entire family, Scott’s entire family and all Scott and Laci’s friends told the police and media that Scott was excited about becoming a father.

Scott’s friend, Greg Reed testified in court how excited Scott was to become a father, how they attended Lamaze classes together, and how Greg and Scott looked through the Cabela’s catalog together and picked out baby clothes for their sons. Scott’s friend, Guy Miligi told the media how Scott had spent many hours preparing the nursery.

Neighbor, Karen Servas told police that both Scott and Laci were excited about the pregnancy and upcoming baby. Another neighbor, Susan Medina, first met Scott in December 2002 when he gave her a ride to work because she had a flat tire. She testified that she and Scott discussed Laci’s pregnancy and who her doctor was. Scott & Laci’s maid, Margarita Nava, told the police that Scott and Laci were excited about the baby and had the nursery all prepared.

Scott had painted the nursery and Conner’s dresser. He had assembled the crib and also made the table shown in the photo below to match one Laci had seen in a catalog. Scott went with Laci to her OB/GYN appointment on December 23, 2002. Scott and Laci had planned this pregnancy, they were excited to become parents, and Scott was an involved father-to-be.

https://www.scottpetersonappeal.org/conners-nursery.html

I guess Scott's sister found this thread.

So what you're saying is, there is no way that a man whom also killed his wife and unborn child isn't also a sociopath and appeared totally normal to everyone on the outside?

Domestic abusers love to charm everyone around the victim. That way, when the victim complains, no one will believe her.

Anonymous wrote:There are many clues that Laci was kidnapped. She wasn’t even wearing the same clothes pas written in the missing poster. She was found in tan capris and Connor had a bow tie string around his neck. How does manipulation under water happen to that extent where string could perfectly tie like that?

Those were all handmade weapons. We don’t know the actual cause of death of either (drowning, asphyxiation, strangling, dismemberment). Laci’s autopsy is sealed and wasn’t allowed in court.

How can someone be sentenced to death all because he was a cheater and a liar? That doesn’t equal murder

Wait until you find out people can be convicted of murder without there even being a body. The evidence against Scott was damning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it.

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever.

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.

Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.

Yes, it most certainly is.

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases. The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?

Uh because many many people saw him, and if he tried to lie it would make him look even worse? C'mon, you can't say that makes him innocent.

Yeah, to me this is most incriminating part of the whole case by far, that the bodies washed up in the same area that he went fishing, which was 90 miles from home. What are the chances someone other than Scott just happened to dump them in the same area?

It's also a bizarre aspect of the case. He established this whole fishing alibi to show where he was and that he couldn't have killed Laci and yet that's where the bodies wash up. WTF? Normally an alibi is setup to demonstrate innocence. It totally backfired in this instance. My guess is that he was confident that the bodies wouldn't be found and that's why he was happy to show evidence of his fishing trip. Not very smart.

The bodies were planted there after the search stopped in March. How does electrical tape stay stuck on both Laci and Connors skin if they were submerged in water for months? The tape would’ve been the first thing to loosen and float away

Badly decomposed bodies consistent with being submerged in water were planted? Sure. Sure they were.

Unfortunate trial quote from Detective Grogan regarding follow up on Laci sightings that came in the first week she was missing:

“Well, I can't say that the sightings were automatically a priority for us at that time in the investigation”

When Laci went missing on December 24, 2002, she was 33 weeks pregnant (just over 7 1/2 months). You couldn’t find a family member or friend who thought Scott was involved in her disappearance. Laci’s entire family, Scott’s entire family and all Scott and Laci’s friends told the police and media that Scott was excited about becoming a father.

Scott’s friend, Greg Reed testified in court how excited Scott was to become a father, how they attended Lamaze classes together, and how Greg and Scott looked through the Cabela’s catalog together and picked out baby clothes for their sons. Scott’s friend, Guy Miligi told the media how Scott had spent many hours preparing the nursery.

Neighbor, Karen Servas told police that both Scott and Laci were excited about the pregnancy and upcoming baby. Another neighbor, Susan Medina, first met Scott in December 2002 when he gave her a ride to work because she had a flat tire. She testified that she and Scott discussed Laci’s pregnancy and who her doctor was. Scott & Laci’s maid, Margarita Nava, told the police that Scott and Laci were excited about the baby and had the nursery all prepared.

Scott had painted the nursery and Conner’s dresser. He had assembled the crib and also made the table shown in the photo below to match one Laci had seen in a catalog. Scott went with Laci to her OB/GYN appointment on December 23, 2002. Scott and Laci had planned this pregnancy, they were excited to become parents, and Scott was an involved father-to-be.

https://www.scottpetersonappeal.org/conners-nursery.html

It's quite typical through the course of an interrogation for law enforcement to use deception to advance their investigation. In Scott's case, however, the lies and deception of the police and prosecution were not used while interrogating Scott; instead deception was used, as Detective Brocchini testified, "to plant seeds of suspicion".

-Police lied to family and friends saying Scott had purchased life insurance on Laci after she became pregnant.

-The police suggested to Scott's employer that he may be embezzling and an internal audit was done. No improprieties were found.

-The police repeatedly stated in their press conferences that they were unable to confirm that Laci was walking her dog in the park. They were unwilling, not unable.

-The police released photos of Scott's truck and boat on January 2, 2003 and issued a statement that they were trying to corroborate trip to the Berkley Marina. This left the public with the perception that they couldn't confirm Scott's story. Scott had given them his receipt from the Berkley Marina on December 24th and the police had interviewed a city worker on December 27th who had seen Scott at the Marina on December 24th.

-The prosecution insinuated Laci's body was found in the pants she was wearing the evening of December 23rd (which would implicate Scott). Laci's sister, Amy, had told police that they were not the same pants

-Detective Brocchini removed information from a police report that was favorable toward Scott. He found a witness who saw Laci at the warehouse just days before she disappeared. This would corroborate Scott's statement that Laci knew about his boat. However the police were trying to make the boat look like a secret purchase, so Detective Brocchini excised the information from his report.

It's shocking to think that Scott is on death row and there is no physical evidence against him, the prosecution provided no motive, the prosecution couldn't even state how or when Scott killed Laci and on top of all that, Scott told no lies pertaining to the crime he's convicted of. Did Scott lie? Yes. Do any of those lies have anything to do with Laci and Conner's disappearance or murder? No. It's ironic to think that so many people believe that Scott is guilty largely due to his lies and infidelity, and yet what most people think to be true about Scott and this case is a lie.

The media is definitely soft launching the case for his innocence rightfully so.

https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/scott-peterson-wants-to-show-people-the-truth-after-lacis-murder/

Looking back to the time eight before his wife and unborn child disappeared from their Modesto, California, home on Christmas Eve nearly 22 years ago, their bodies later washing up in the SanFrancisco Bay, Scott Peterson is overcome with emotion. “Every moment is so real, is so tactile and still there. The smells and the lighting, the sound of when I said goodbye to Laci, and then my family was gone,” he says in his first interview in more than two decades, which is featured in the new Peacock docuseries Face to Face With Scott Peterson. “I drove away [to go fishing] expecting to come back that afternoon and have a wonderful Christmas together, and they were gone.”

Scott says he wants justice — for them and for himself. In 2004, following a five-month trial that gripped the nation, he was convicted of murdering his eight-months-pregnant spouse, 27, and the son they planned to name Conner. Scott, whose death sentence was overturned in 2020 due to issues with jury selection and later replaced by life without parole, has long insisted he’s no killer. In recent months, his legal team — the Los Angeles Innocence Project took on his case in January — has ramped up efforts to prove that as they push for a retrial and new DNA testing. “Don’t trust me,” the 51-year-old says. “Look at the evidence.”

Controversial Theory
The fertilizer salesman was convicted without physical evidence linking him to the deaths. He believes police didn’t thoroughly investigate other leads because they early on decided to focus solely on him, especially after learning he’d been cheating on Laci with a Fresno, California, massage therapist named Amber Frey, 49. “There was a burglary across the street from our home. There [were] a lot of people involved. And I believe Laci went over there to see what was going on, and that’s when she was taken,” Scott says in the doc, sharing a theory investigators have dismissed. Though two men confessed to the neighbors’ robbery, a witness recalled seeing different men as well as a van parked outside. The day after Laci’s disappearance, a burned-out orange van was discovered a mile away.

Scott’s defense team believes the cases could be connected. They asked for DNA testing on 14 pieces of evidence, including a stained mattress found inside the vehicle. However, in May, a judge denied all their requests but one — approving testing on a piece of duct tape found on Laci’s pants, which Scott’s lawyers believe might hold DNA that implicates someone else.

There are many clues that Laci was kidnapped. She wasn’t even wearing the same clothes pas written in the missing poster. She was found in tan capris and Connor had a bow tie string around his neck. How does manipulation under water happen to that extent where string could perfectly tie like that?

Those were all handmade weapons. We don’t know the actual cause of death of either (drowning, asphyxiation, strangling, dismemberment). Laci’s autopsy is sealed and wasn’t allowed in court.

How can someone be sentenced to death all because he was a cheater and a liar? That doesn’t equal murder

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it.

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever.

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.

Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.

Yes, it most certainly is.

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases. The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?

Uh because many many people saw him, and if he tried to lie it would make him look even worse? C'mon, you can't say that makes him innocent.

Yeah, to me this is most incriminating part of the whole case by far, that the bodies washed up in the same area that he went fishing, which was 90 miles from home. What are the chances someone other than Scott just happened to dump them in the same area?

It's also a bizarre aspect of the case. He established this whole fishing alibi to show where he was and that he couldn't have killed Laci and yet that's where the bodies wash up. WTF? Normally an alibi is setup to demonstrate innocence. It totally backfired in this instance. My guess is that he was confident that the bodies wouldn't be found and that's why he was happy to show evidence of his fishing trip. Not very smart.

The bodies were planted there after the search stopped in March. How does electrical tape stay stuck on both Laci and Connors skin if they were submerged in water for months? The tape would’ve been the first thing to loosen and float away

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know if you’ve been around an 18 month old but someone that’s not good with kids or hates kids wouldn’t be great at handling driving and picking up a toddler (who doesn’t even know them) by themselves.

Scott decorated the nursery with fishing decor and they both came up with the name Connor. Who took all those nice pics of pregnant Laci? Scott. Scott’s happy in all the pics as well. There’s no indication they weren’t a happy expectant family. Yes, he cheated and lied that he wasn’t married and that’s wrong but he only did that for sex. Leaving Laci for Amber because he didn’t want the responsibility of a kid makes no sense because Amber was a single mom. He wanted to ditch being a father to be a stepdad? Amber was financially looking for a father figure for her daughter as the last man dumped her and sued her for lying about his paternity of the little girl. Scott was probably going to dump her by January once he figured out she wanted a full time stepdad figure

So what? Angry, passive men go along publicly with what their wives want and secretly hate them for it. Chris Watts is another example of this same personality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think Laci found out about Amber and they got in a fight and he accidentally killed her?

It still doesn’t explain how 150
Lb Laci and 200+ lb Scott fit on a tiny fishing boat without capsizing or anyone seeing that show. Her body would’ve floated if he buried it where he was fishing. It was shallow water specifically for fishing

I don’t think it would have been an accident he would have killed her in a rage. She and the baby were keeping him from the life he really wanted.

What life that he really wanted? Laci was a homemaker who worshipped Scott. She knew about his past affairs and was young and beautiful enough to divorce him and find another husband but she didn’t care.

Scott’s from San Diego Which is hours away from Modesto. Californias huge. He could’ve moved away and never looked back. Why would he have to kill her? He could’ve made sure she was on birth control if he was really concerned about kids. They waited 5 years to have kids and recently purchased that house. The idea that he didn’t want to be a father is the only motive the prosecution could use because there was no history of DV between Laci and Scott and Laci never told her family that she feared her life around Scott. Scott even picked up Amber’s 18 month old from daycare a few times in the weeks prior. She let a man she knew for only a week pick up her daughter from school.

Clearly men should just divorce their wives but many choose murder instead. Nobody is arguing it’s logical. Look at the recent Manassas woman Mamta Bhatt. Happens all the time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it.

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever.

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.

Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.

Yes, it most certainly is.

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases. The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?

Uh because many many people saw him, and if he tried to lie it would make him look even worse? C'mon, you can't say that makes him innocent.

Yeah, to me this is most incriminating part of the whole case by far, that the bodies washed up in the same area that he went fishing, which was 90 miles from home. What are the chances someone other than Scott just happened to dump them in the same area?

It's also a bizarre aspect of the case. He established this whole fishing alibi to show where he was and that he couldn't have killed Laci and yet that's where the bodies wash up. WTF? Normally an alibi is setup to demonstrate innocence. It totally backfired in this instance. My guess is that he was confident that the bodies wouldn't be found and that's why he was happy to show evidence of his fishing trip. Not very smart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

A bunch of text like police witness statements and timelines and evidence pieces like a watch and safe.

Where’s the conspiracy in posting things that were connected to the initial Laci Peterson search? Scott was arrested in April. The neighborhood and Lacis family thought the burglar van had something to do with Laci and they believed she was kidnapped not killed. It wasn’t until Amber Frey went public with the calls that the public assumed the worst that Laci was dead and Scott did it. All because the Pearl clutchers couldn’t imagine cheating and lying was not a scandal implying murder

Or is it because it's hard to trust lying liars? How can he say he loved her and wants her home safe when he's planning a life without her? At the very very least, it ruins his credibility for anything else he says.

I don’t know if you’ve been around an 18 month old but someone that’s not good with kids or hates kids wouldn’t be great at handling driving and picking up a toddler (who doesn’t even know them) by themselves.

Scott decorated the nursery with fishing decor and they both came up with the name Connor. Who took all those nice pics of pregnant Laci? Scott. Scott’s happy in all the pics as well. There’s no indication they weren’t a happy expectant family. Yes, he cheated and lied that he wasn’t married and that’s wrong but he only did that for sex. Leaving Laci for Amber because he didn’t want the responsibility of a kid makes no sense because Amber was a single mom. He wanted to ditch being a father to be a stepdad? Amber was financially looking for a father figure for her daughter as the last man dumped her and sued her for lying about his paternity of the little girl. Scott was probably going to dump her by January once he figured out she wanted a full time stepdad figure