Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:47     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I’ve been saying forever that these are just shame masks.


Speaking of masks, even the Gestapo didn't wear them. They often dressed in plain clothes or standard SS-style uniforms to blend in or identify with other Nazis--but no masks.


There is a German guy I follow who is a historian and whose grandfather was a Nazi. He was recently talking about how this group is less like the Klan and more like slave patrols. He’s also pretty surprised the way that people protect despite personal risk. The Germans never bothered.

The Klan began as slave patrols, btw.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:45     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Agree. The idea that they are masked out of shame is disingenuous, deceitful, & stupid, even by Democrat standards.


If it weren't an effort to maintain anonymity, they would present identification and they wouldn't swap out license plates.

Try again.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:43     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like ICE likes to use their vehicles as weapons. This is just one of a number of videos I’ve seen of ICE ramming their vehicles into the cars of a US citizen. I wonder who’s paying for all these repair costs of official government vehicles.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTbubTvgFBi/?igsh=MXh2NzBncHN0dnlkNA==


Exactly.

Taxpayers are going to foot the bill for lawsuits against Gestapo excesses.

Trump is not going to survive this. He's going to get removed from office. That's my prediction. Noem and her brown shirts will face prosecution.


That’s a nice thought, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:42     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Why are they different than any public official? I have a relative who is an elected official and has been harassed, but still has to show their face every day.

And regarding the masks, you don’t think local cops deal with more people who are high inebriated or spitting for whatever reason? C’mon now with your excuses. They’re wearing thin for most people except hard-core Maga.


+1
cops
judges
lawmakers
school leaders

Lots of people in the USA who do work that will never please everyone has to show their faces.

DHS is just doing another thing that is causing the American people to not support them. It is stupid.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:40     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:Looks like ICE likes to use their vehicles as weapons. This is just one of a number of videos I’ve seen of ICE ramming their vehicles into the cars of a US citizen. I wonder who’s paying for all these repair costs of official government vehicles.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTbubTvgFBi/?igsh=MXh2NzBncHN0dnlkNA==


Exactly.

Taxpayers are going to foot the bill for lawsuits against Gestapo excesses.

Trump is not going to survive this. He's going to get removed from office. That's my prediction. Noem and her brown shirts will face prosecution.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:32     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Why are they different than any public official? I have a relative who is an elected official and has been harassed, but still has to show their face every day.

And regarding the masks, you don’t think local cops deal with more people who are high inebriated or spitting for whatever reason? C’mon now with your excuses. They’re wearing thin for most people except hard-core Maga.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:30     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:Looks like ICE likes to use their vehicles as weapons. This is just one of a number of videos I’ve seen of ICE ramming their vehicles into the cars of a US citizen. I wonder who’s paying for all these repair costs of official government vehicles.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTbubTvgFBi/?igsh=MXh2NzBncHN0dnlkNA==


Seems like a case in which you’d be able to defend yourself, at least according to the local ICE lickers.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:30     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Agree. The idea that they are masked out of shame is disingenuous, deceitful, & stupid, even by Democrat standards.


Shame is certainly part of it. I'd seriously doubt that they want their friends, neighbors, local businesses they frequent, etc. to know they're part of this abuse. It's not hard to believe at all.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:29     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Looks like ICE likes to use their vehicles as weapons. This is just one of a number of videos I’ve seen of ICE ramming their vehicles into the cars of a US citizen. I wonder who’s paying for all these repair costs of official government vehicles.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTbubTvgFBi/?igsh=MXh2NzBncHN0dnlkNA==
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:29     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


🥨 logic incoming
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:28     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Agree. The idea that they are masked out of shame is disingenuous, deceitful, & stupid, even by Democrat standards.


It’s real, go ahead and be sad about it. They bring shame upon themselves and their families. That’s why they wear masks and lie to their families and neighbors about what they’ve resorted to doing for money.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:27     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Agree. The idea that they are masked out of shame is disingenuous, deceitful, & stupid, even by Democrat standards.


zzzzz Nobody cares what you think

The American public is not voting for the GOP and is not standing with DHS

Enjoy your cope though
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:24     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit


Agree. The idea that they are masked out of shame is disingenuous, deceitful, & stupid, even by Democrat standards.
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 11:15     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:



Not necessarily shame.
1) trying to protect themselves from activists who might dox or harm them
2) protect themselves from suspects who spit and vomit
Anonymous
Post 01/14/2026 09:55     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Congress introducing articles of impeachment against ICE Barbie:
They accuse the secretary of willfully obstructing congressional oversight by withholding appropriated funds and repeatedly blocking lawmakers from entering DHS facilities. It further alleges a violation of public trust through the use of “warrantless arrests” and the use of “violence against US citizens and lawful individuals”. It also charges Noem with self-dealing for “inappropriately” using taxpayer dollars to fund an ad campaign for ICE recruitment, and awarding the $200m recruitment contract to a firm run by the husband of senior DHS official and chief spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.