Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy outside Kavanagh's house called the cops on himself. His gun was unloaded and in a case. Something isn't adding up.

He called the cops on himself AFTER he was met by 2 marshals. Likely hoping for an "abandonment defense" - meaning he abandoned his plans before following through with them. Knowing that marshals were onto him......

In his suitcase and backpack were a Glock 17 with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, a tactical knife, a hammer, a screwdriver, a crow bar, zip ties and duct tape, along with other gear.

We need a citation for your claim that the gun was unloaded. That information was not in the charging document.

No, the other PP is right. He didn’t meet anyone, he saw two marshals, then just turned himself in. “Once arriving to the Maryland home early Wednesday, Roske spotted two deputy U.S. marshals, part of Kavanaugh’s security detail, standing outside a car, according to an FBI affidavit filed in federal court. He walked away, turned a corner and called 911 to turn himself in.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/09/roske-kavanaugh-911-tapes/

Something is indeed not adding up. The guy gets all that tactical gear, then just sees two LEO and turns himself in? That doesn’t even make sense.

Oh and if you bothered to read the whole article, he himself said the guns were locked up and unloaded.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy outside Kavanagh's house called the cops on himself. His gun was unloaded and in a case. Something isn't adding up.

He called the cops on himself AFTER he was met by 2 marshals. Likely hoping for an "abandonment defense" - meaning he abandoned his plans before following through with them. Knowing that marshals were onto him......

In his suitcase and backpack were a Glock 17 with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, a tactical knife, a hammer, a screwdriver, a crow bar, zip ties and duct tape, along with other gear.

We need a citation for your claim that the gun was unloaded. That information was not in the charging document.

No, the other PP is right. He didn’t meet anyone, he saw two marshals, then just turned himself in. “Once arriving to the Maryland home early Wednesday, Roske spotted two deputy U.S. marshals, part of Kavanaugh’s security detail, standing outside a car, according to an FBI affidavit filed in federal court. He walked away, turned a corner and called 911 to turn himself in.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/09/roske-kavanaugh-911-tapes/

Something is indeed not adding up. The guy gets all that tactical gear, then just sees two LEO and turns himself in? That doesn’t even make sense.

Anonymous wrote:The guy outside Kavanagh's house called the cops on himself. His gun was unloaded and in a case. Something isn't adding up.

He called the cops on himself AFTER he was met by 2 marshals. Likely hoping for an "abandonment defense" - meaning he abandoned his plans before following through with them. Knowing that marshals were onto him......

In his suitcase and backpack were a Glock 17 with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, a tactical knife, a hammer, a screwdriver, a crow bar, zip ties and duct tape, along with other gear.

We need a citation for your claim that the gun was unloaded. That information was not in the charging document.

The guy outside Kavanagh's house called the cops on himself. His gun was unloaded and in a case. Something isn't adding up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Evidence that the perpetrators are “pro abortionists”?

Probably false flag.

+2

This is very much the MO of the forced birthers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Evidence that the perpetrators are “pro abortionists”?

Probably false flag.

I agree. Which side has a documented history of shooting into and firebombing clinics? And murders? They loved and protected Eric Rudolph, who killed three people, one a police officer. injured 20+ people. He was their super star.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Rudolph

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Evidence that the perpetrators are “pro abortionists”?

Probably false flag.

Anonymous wrote:

Evidence that the perpetrators are “pro abortionists”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Nancy blocking the bill that was passed in the Senate to provide security for SCOTUS Justices?

Does a man carrying a gun in the vicinity of other people's home, school, mall, shopping centers etc pose security concerns to those people or it is limited to the the people being justices? Asking for a friend...

When threats have been made against the Justices and they find a man with a knife, a gun, and burglary tools near the home of a Justice and the man said he wanted to assassinate the Justice......
Yeah, I think this is a serious threat.

I’m sure you said the same thing about this guy:


Right? Oh wait. No, you didn’t.

You all were totally fine when an armed nut protested outside of a VA legislator's home.

Why is this any different?

Because an ‘armed nut’ to democrats isn’t always an ‘armed nut’. There’s a huge difference between someone openly carrying and protesting legally, and someone who carries hidden weapons, tools, and zip ties.

So you’d be fine with this guy if he open carried and left accessories at home?

Incoherent, inconsistent right wing gobbledygook. Hypocrisy. Rights for me but not for thee. It was considered "peaceful" by the right wing to have zip ties, tools and weapons when they stormed the US Capitol on J6. Fine for right wing nutjobs to show up armed with AR-15s outside state capitols and governors' homes to protest mask mandates as they did but suddenly now they act shocked to have someone show up armed outside a justice's home to protest the overturn of Roe v Wade. WTF

Exactly. They will say whatever they think they need to say to get their way. They don’t believe in any of it.

They really don’t believe in anything except this:

The above thread is so informative, so helpful in correctly reframing the GOP’s complete horsesit that I’m going to plop it into every thread where it applies.

Spot on.

Anonymous wrote:

I don't condone this type of violence, yet I'm not surprised that someone's so angry about the abortion issue that they follow the GOP's lead and start reacting the way the crazy anti-abortion folk do when they bomb abortion clinics and kill doctors who perform abortions.

The GOP is so good at getting their followers worked up emotionally. The abortion issue has worked great for the GOP, most of whom could not care less about "saving babies." They want to save their votes, and are brilliant at using emotional issues like abortion to keep their foaming at the mouth followers worked up and voting for them. Cynics, all of them.

You reap what you sow, GOP, so expect more of this type of violence. You started it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roe being gone is going to be like Prohibition. Rammed thru by a religious minority while people in the middle think it somehow won't affect them.

Once the magnitude of what Alito has done becomes apparent, it's going to be an unimaginable sh@!show with crushing consequences.

Poverty will skyrocket, doctors won't want to deal with pregnant women at all and women of means will stop having children at all. Too risky.

No. The rich have found another way to exploit the poor by having poor women be their surrogates so they don't have to lose their svelte figures and go through pregnancy. Some movie star hired a surrogate to have her twins because pregnancy would harm her job opportunities.

No, the PP to whom you’re replying is correct. This is going to be so horrible, have so many wretched consequences that these forced birth dingbats haven’t even thought of. They’re so effing stupid. So utterly, incredibly effing stupid.

I agree with both of you but poor women will still be exploited by wealthy women even more so than they are today. I am terrified that many, many more mass shootings. I do not plan to go to beach this summer and I would not send my children to camp. I have become numb with terror.

Yes, poor women will be exploited and even those who are not, in order to protect themselves, might have to give up on the idea of having children altogether. There is just going to be so much needless suffering because too many MoDeRaTeS think they’re above the fray.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roe being gone is going to be like Prohibition. Rammed thru by a religious minority while people in the middle think it somehow won't affect them.

Once the magnitude of what Alito has done becomes apparent, it's going to be an unimaginable sh@!show with crushing consequences.

Poverty will skyrocket, doctors won't want to deal with pregnant women at all and women of means will stop having children at all. Too risky.

No. The rich have found another way to exploit the poor by having poor women be their surrogates so they don't have to lose their svelte figures and go through pregnancy. Some movie star hired a surrogate to have her twins because pregnancy would harm her job opportunities.

No, the PP to whom you’re replying is correct. This is going to be so horrible, have so many wretched consequences that these forced birth dingbats haven’t even thought of. They’re so effing stupid. So utterly, incredibly effing stupid.

I agree with both of you but poor women will still be exploited by wealthy women even more so than they are today. I am terrified that many, many more mass shootings. I do not plan to go to beach this summer and I would not send my children to camp. I have become numb with terror.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roe being gone is going to be like Prohibition. Rammed thru by a religious minority while people in the middle think it somehow won't affect them.

Once the magnitude of what Alito has done becomes apparent, it's going to be an unimaginable sh@!show with crushing consequences.

Poverty will skyrocket, doctors won't want to deal with pregnant women at all and women of means will stop having children at all. Too risky.

No. The rich have found another way to exploit the poor by having poor women be their surrogates so they don't have to lose their svelte figures and go through pregnancy. Some movie star hired a surrogate to have her twins because pregnancy would harm her job opportunities.

No, the PP to whom you’re replying is correct. This is going to be so horrible, have so many wretched consequences that these forced birth dingbats haven’t even thought of. They’re so effing stupid. So utterly, incredibly effing stupid.

Anonymous wrote: Roe being gone is going to be like Prohibition. Rammed thru by a religious minority while people in the middle think it somehow won't affect them.

Once the magnitude of what Alito has done becomes apparent, it's going to be an unimaginable sh@!show with crushing consequences.

Poverty will skyrocket, doctors won't want to deal with pregnant women at all and women of means will stop having children at all. Too risky.

No. The rich have found another way to exploit the poor by having poor women be their surrogates so they don't have to lose their svelte figures and go through pregnancy. Some movie star hired a surrogate to have her twins because pregnancy would harm her job opportunities.