Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s on his way out anyway. Why do we have to tolerate him anymore?
He is?? Where is he going? How do you know he's on his way out?
Maybe he's going back to Lynchburg, the Falwell country.
Who are you kidding? The City of Lynchburg is downright progressive compared to Great Falls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s on his way out anyway. Why do we have to tolerate him anymore?
He is?? Where is he going? How do you know he's on his way out?
Maybe he's going back to Lynchburg, the Falwell country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s on his way out anyway. Why do we have to tolerate him anymore?
He is?? Where is he going? How do you know he's on his way out?
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t the Tysons growth going to make it worse? Are they expecting increasing enrollment at McLean and Marshall?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why they will probably just move the Colvin Run and Spring Hill areas to Langley and call it a day. They are both split feeders that already feed primarily into Cooper/Langley. It won’t change Langley’s demographics much, and it will push up the FARMS rate at McLean slightly, but the kids know each other and Spring Hill does include some apartments.
They can still relocate a modular to McLean and build an addition in a few years. The McLean area is where more families with kids want to live now, as it’s more affordable and centrally located, and they should keep as many of those kids within the pyramid as possible.
I thought that I read that closing Spring Hill would add poorer areas to Langley?
Closing? Did you mean moving?
If you move a group that is higher FARMS than Langley as a whole, but lower than McLean as a whole, it increases the FARMS rates at both schools.
Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why they will probably just move the Colvin Run and Spring Hill areas to Langley and call it a day. They are both split feeders that already feed primarily into Cooper/Langley. It won’t change Langley’s demographics much, and it will push up the FARMS rate at McLean slightly, but the kids know each other and Spring Hill does include some apartments.
They can still relocate a modular to McLean and build an addition in a few years. The McLean area is where more families with kids want to live now, as it’s more affordable and centrally located, and they should keep as many of those kids within the pyramid as possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why they will probably just move the Colvin Run and Spring Hill areas to Langley and call it a day. They are both split feeders that already feed primarily into Cooper/Langley. It won’t change Langley’s demographics much, and it will push up the FARMS rate at McLean slightly, but the kids know each other and Spring Hill does include some apartments.
They can still relocate a modular to McLean and build an addition in a few years. The McLean area is where more families with kids want to live now, as it’s more affordable and centrally located, and they should keep as many of those kids within the pyramid as possible.
I thought that I read that closing Spring Hill would add poorer areas to Langley?
Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why they will probably just move the Colvin Run and Spring Hill areas to Langley and call it a day. They are both split feeders that already feed primarily into Cooper/Langley. It won’t change Langley’s demographics much, and it will push up the FARMS rate at McLean slightly, but the kids know each other and Spring Hill does include some apartments.
They can still relocate a modular to McLean and build an addition in a few years. The McLean area is where more families with kids want to live now, as it’s more affordable and centrally located, and they should keep as many of those kids within the pyramid as possible.
Boundary changes are hard because people have made long term financial decisions (like purchasing a home) based on school boundaries. It's not so simple to just change these. I'm in a neighborhood that I'm pretty sure would stay as it's currently structured, simply because of proximity to the schools we're assigned to, but I really feel for people who might face changes. There are very few situations where you'd be getting a better deal with boundary changes. You're talking about moving people who have chosen to pay more for a house to be in a better school zone to a worse school zone and changing their housing value drastically. Not a good solution.
I think they should work harder to improve the schools as they exist. We are at an elementary school that is only 46% white and 40% FARMs with a high ESL rate. My kids are white upper middle class and we love this school. The principal and teachers are excellent. There are challenges, of course, but the wider community supports the school as well (churches help with food over weekends and summer, coat drives, etc.). There are ways to meet a school's needs where it is instead of trying to change the student population. I also think there's an element of racism in the thought that adding "white rich kids" will improve a school.
Anonymous wrote:He’s on his way out anyway. Why do we have to tolerate him anymore?