Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I received an email today about an
Bot
Not.
I hit save by accident and got distracted. As I was saying... I received an email today about attending a parent info session. They are still recruiting for 2019-20.
That was a joke.
Really they’re not as creepy as everyone here thinks. I’m amazed none of the people on waitlists are considering them, especially as they’re giving tuition breaks for the first few years.
It doesn't matter how much they charge or what kind of break they are giving. No one wants to make their kids the guinea pigs in a new, unaccredited institution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I received an email today about an
Bot
Not.
I hit save by accident and got distracted. As I was saying... I received an email today about attending a parent info session. They are still recruiting for 2019-20.
That was a joke.
Really they’re not as creepy as everyone here thinks. I’m amazed none of the people on waitlists are considering them, especially as they’re giving tuition breaks for the first few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I received an email today about an
Bot
Not.
I hit save by accident and got distracted. As I was saying... I received an email today about attending a parent info session. They are still recruiting for 2019-20.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I received an email today about an
Bot
Anonymous wrote:I received an email today about an
Anonymous wrote:
The money absolutely had to come from someone motivated by something other than a financial return and that has the deepest of deep pockets. Hard to see this as someone other than a nation state or quasi-government investment arm.
The money comes from a person but from a COUNTRY that is motivated from other than a financial return. The return would be establishing an intelligence and eavesdropping operation in the middle of NW Washington disguised as a private school. I have no doubt that this operation is being backed financially by the leadership of the Peoples Republic of China. The so called delay in getting the permits for the building renovations gave them enough time to create the infrastructure for their electronic equipment. You will soon see so called exchange students who are really trained operatives infiltrating Washington DC households. Our laws should be changed to screen out operations like this from even opening up.
Anonymous wrote:[b]T[b]hat link is interesting but doesn't really address who is financing the $185M in renovation. To be clear, the article puts a valuation of $110M on the real estate but says that Whittle is putting $185M into renovating it (which seems preposterous).
No rational investor seeking financial return is going to put up $185M for a school renovation. It's absurd. Again, near as I can tell, they don't even own the building. So if they don't pay their rent, they lose the money. There is no way that the building landlords ponied up $185M in tenant improvement money.
The money absolutely had to come from someone motivated by something other than a financial return and that has the deepest of deep pockets. Hard to see this as someone other than a nation state or quasi-government investment arm.
The money comes from a person but from a COUNTRY that is motivated from other than a financial return. The return would be establishing an intelligence and eavesdropping operation in the middle of NW Washington disguised as a private school. I have no doubt that this operation is being backed financially by the leadership of the Peoples Republic of China. The so called delay in getting the permits for the building renovations gave them enough time to create the infrastructure for their electronic equipment. You will soon see so called exchange students who are really trained operatives infiltrating Washington DC households. Our laws should be changed to screen out operations like this from even opening up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I wouldn’t want my kid going to a school funded by the Chinese government, “Chinese go home” is just as racist as our president and totally unamerican.
Liberals are lovely people, aren't they?
Not sure you made the point you were trying to make here. Are you trying to prop up the previous racist comment by attacking someone for calling racism Un-American?
Signed,
Someone who grew up in the South around real conservatives who weren't racist windbags but just believed in small government
Not defending either PP but I read the lovely liberal comment as referencing the racist comments, not the response to them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I wouldn’t want my kid going to a school funded by the Chinese government, “Chinese go home” is just as racist as our president and totally unamerican.
Liberals are lovely people, aren't they?
Not sure you made the point you were trying to make here. Are you trying to prop up the previous racist comment by attacking someone for calling racism Un-American?
Signed,
Someone who grew up in the South around real conservatives who weren't racist windbags but just believed in small government
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I wouldn’t want my kid going to a school funded by the Chinese government, “Chinese go home” is just as racist as our president and totally unamerican.
Liberals are lovely people, aren't they?