Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about HGC students from CCES and Barnsley? Are they doing better than Cold Spring kids?
Page 20, 17:09, so far only bad news for Barnsley. No news report from CCES as far as I can remember.
No news report from anywhere. This is DCUM. DCUM is not a news outlet. DCUM is an Internet message board. On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.
The year my smart kid didn't get into a MS magnet, I didn't post on DCUM to say: my kid didn't get into the MS magnet; this proves that the admissions process is flawed and that MCPS hates smart kids.
Anonymous wrote:Plus the smart kids in home school will not be together. They will be sprinkled into different classes in home middle schools, because after all, all classes are honors class now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about HGC students from CCES and Barnsley? Are they doing better than Cold Spring kids?
Page 20, 17:09, so far only bad news for Barnsley. No news report from CCES as far as I can remember.
Anonymous wrote:What about HGC students from CCES and Barnsley? Are they doing better than Cold Spring kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those that are shocked by difficulty in admission, doesn't this FAQ from MCPS cover a lot of it:
My child scores for the various criteria are in the 90+ percentiles, why did my child not get
selected?
This year, the process looked at all fifth grade elementary students in 80 elementary schools. This
changed our examination of student need for magnet programs to considering over 4,000 Grade 5
students – a sharp increase to the previous traditional parent application process which yielded a look
at fewer students, 700 to 800 applicants total.
This year’s process included looking at the Grade 5 report card, reading level, math enrichment access,
MAP-R and MAP-M, PARCC performance in reading and math, student questionnaire, student voice
and the outside assessment. An additional variable of looking at students through the lens of comparable
academic peer group within a school accessing enriched and acceleration instruction in core content
areas, was part of the process.
Your child, while high performing, has an academic peer group within her local school and doesn’t
present as an outlier within that group. We encourage you to work with your local middle school
principal for programming and grouping practices.
What a shame for the last sentence on this FAQ answer! It’s like it’s all your fault to be smart and work hard and can afford a W cluster house. Now wipe your own ass cos it’s none of my business any more. Shame on MCPS!
+1 That's really ridiculous.
+2. They encourage parents to 'work with middle school principal for grouping practices'? So now it's the parents' job to hound teachers to create 'programming and grouping' for their children?
That really doesn't make any sense whatsoever, especially given the fact that there is no clearly defined curriculum, very little information on existing grouping and programming, and, most importantly, no guarantees that anyone anywhere will take parents' suggestions seriously.
Anonymous wrote:
What a shame for the last sentence on this FAQ answer! It’s like it’s all your fault to be smart and work hard and can afford a W cluster house. Now wipe your own ass cos it’s none of my business any more. Shame on MCPS!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those that are shocked by difficulty in admission, doesn't this FAQ from MCPS cover a lot of it:
My child scores for the various criteria are in the 90+ percentiles, why did my child not get
selected?
This year, the process looked at all fifth grade elementary students in 80 elementary schools. This
changed our examination of student need for magnet programs to considering over 4,000 Grade 5
students – a sharp increase to the previous traditional parent application process which yielded a look
at fewer students, 700 to 800 applicants total.
This year’s process included looking at the Grade 5 report card, reading level, math enrichment access,
MAP-R and MAP-M, PARCC performance in reading and math, student questionnaire, student voice
and the outside assessment. An additional variable of looking at students through the lens of comparable
academic peer group within a school accessing enriched and acceleration instruction in core content
areas, was part of the process.
Your child, while high performing, has an academic peer group within her local school and doesn’t
present as an outlier within that group. We encourage you to work with your local middle school
principal for programming and grouping practices.
What a shame for the last sentence on this FAQ answer! It’s like it’s all your fault to be smart and work hard and can afford a W cluster house. Now wipe your own ass cos it’s none of my business any more. Shame on MCPS!
+1 That's really ridiculous.
+2. They encourage parents to 'work with middle school principal for grouping practices'? So now it's the parents' job to hound teachers to create 'programming and grouping' for their children?
That really doesn't make any sense whatsoever, especially given the fact that there is no clearly defined curriculum, very little information on existing grouping and programming, and, most importantly, no guarantees that anyone anywhere will take parents' suggestions seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will TPMS dominant the math and computer competitions in future? Will TPMS be able to form a science bowll team? Does MCPS care it reputation?
Nope. They just want to close the achievement gap by lowering the bar
My kid is nearly done with MCPS I really feel sad for the kids in Cold Spring ES
Anonymous wrote:Will TPMS dominant the math and computer competitions in future? Will TPMS be able to form a science bowll team? Does MCPS care it reputation?
Anonymous wrote:Will TPMS dominant the math and computer competitions in future? Will TPMS be able to form a science bowll team? Does MCPS care it reputation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those that are shocked by difficulty in admission, doesn't this FAQ from MCPS cover a lot of it:
My child scores for the various criteria are in the 90+ percentiles, why did my child not get
selected?
This year, the process looked at all fifth grade elementary students in 80 elementary schools. This
changed our examination of student need for magnet programs to considering over 4,000 Grade 5
students – a sharp increase to the previous traditional parent application process which yielded a look
at fewer students, 700 to 800 applicants total.
This year’s process included looking at the Grade 5 report card, reading level, math enrichment access,
MAP-R and MAP-M, PARCC performance in reading and math, student questionnaire, student voice
and the outside assessment. An additional variable of looking at students through the lens of comparable
academic peer group within a school accessing enriched and acceleration instruction in core content
areas, was part of the process.
Your child, while high performing, has an academic peer group within her local school and doesn’t
present as an outlier within that group. We encourage you to work with your local middle school
principal for programming and grouping practices.
What a shame for the last sentence on this FAQ answer! It’s like it’s all your fault to be smart and work hard and can afford a W cluster house. Now wipe your own ass cos it’s none of my business any more. Shame on MCPS!
+1 That's really ridiculous.