Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

Trump was the only one who could beat Hillary. If there was collusion, they would have exposed him during the campaign. The goal is - and has been - to cloud his Presidency with, essentially, crap.

Anonymous wrote:Great. Now Trump, without any evidence, thinks Rice is guilty, too.

Does he really want to start that? He'd be the first one found guilty without evidence.

Great. Now Trump, without any evidence, thinks Rice is guilty, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

I'm not sure that anything will be tied to Trump, which is the ultimate end of all of these investigations. But nothing? They've definitely found plenty.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/04/04/house-intelligence-democrat-predicts-trump-associates-will-jail/88JpkhZTIDybFwmNTIF2AP/story.html

Nothing here, just an opinion. Reminded me of all the Rep. who thought Hillary was going to jail.

Here's my prediction. It will all blow over. Same with the Rice fiasco.

Rice doing her job and Hillary's emails aren't even close to the plane of dysfunction that is TrumpRussia. Which will not blow over, it actually gets worse by the day.

Anonymous wrote:
When it all comes out, there is zero chance PP will accept it as true. That's the great thing nowadays, if you don't like something, it's fake news!

BINGO!
Comey has come out and said there was Russian interference and they are investigating whether the Trump campaigns' involvement. Apparently some people would prefer to bury their head in the sand then to deal with reality.

EXACT QUOTE:
“I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said. “And that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”

Anonymous wrote:Rice told PBS she had no knowledge that the Trump people were caught up in the surveillance of foreigners.

Hmm didn't she also have a little problem during the Benghazi scandal?

Pretty sure she said she had no clue wtf Nunes was talking about, which was universally true because he was apparently lying and correcting himself,

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

I'm not sure that anything will be tied to Trump, which is the ultimate end of all of these investigations. But nothing? They've definitely found plenty.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/04/04/house-intelligence-democrat-predicts-trump-associates-will-jail/88JpkhZTIDybFwmNTIF2AP/story.html

Nothing here, just an opinion. Reminded me of all the Rep. who thought Hillary was going to jail.

Here's my prediction. It will all blow over. Same with the Rice fiasco.

Well, it could all blow over. We'll see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

I'm not sure that anything will be tied to Trump, which is the ultimate end of all of these investigations. But nothing? They've definitely found plenty.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/04/04/house-intelligence-democrat-predicts-trump-associates-will-jail/88JpkhZTIDybFwmNTIF2AP/story.html

Nothing here, just an opinion. Reminded me of all the Rep. who thought Hillary was going to jail.

Here's my prediction. It will all blow over. Same with the Rice fiasco.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

It's an active.investigation. You'll PROBABLY find out what the proof was when indictments come down.

When it all comes out, there is zero chance PP will accept it as true. That's the great thing nowadays, if you don't like something, it's fake news!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

It's an active.investigation. You'll PROBABLY find out what the proof was when indictments come down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

I'm not sure that anything will be tied to Trump, which is the ultimate end of all of these investigations. But nothing? They've definitely found plenty.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/04/04/house-intelligence-democrat-predicts-trump-associates-will-jail/88JpkhZTIDybFwmNTIF2AP/story.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Yes so far zip. Funny the leaky ship didn't leak any Russian proof! Yes I'm sure the FBI will show lot's of Russian colluding - not.

Rice told PBS she had no knowledge that the Trump people were caught up in the surveillance of foreigners.

Hmm didn't she also have a little problem during the Benghazi scandal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

We don't know what Trump's people were talking to the Russians about. We do know that at least several of them have lied about the communications, denying them and then later admitting them. This could be purely reflexive and not an admission of guilt -- but it looks bad.

So far nothing has been found. Rice also lied when she said she didn't know anything. On MSNBC she backtracked. That looks bad too.

The fuck are you talking about? The investigation is still underway. The FBI is currently creating a special unit to investigate Trump's Russia connections. But I guess that's probably because of how much "nothing" there is!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no proof Trump people were talking with Russian's about the election etc.

At least if there is, I haven't seen it. If it's not unusual for Rice to request "unmasking", give me examples showing she's done this before. If this wasn't routine it needs to be questioned.

HEY EVERYBODY, RANDOM DCUM HASN'T SEEN IT

Call off all the investigations! He has spoken! We're all clear!