Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There isn't much an administration could do. I had hope for both of those schools at one time. Just don't see a path now.
I will say the Randolph principal was not a very nice person or effective manager. That couldn't have helped.
They have a new principal at Randolph now. Started this year I think.
Anonymous wrote:There isn't much an administration could do. I had hope for both of those schools at one time. Just don't see a path now.
I will say the Randolph principal was not a very nice person or effective manager. That couldn't have helped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem isn't the ESOL kids. The problem is putting them all in the same 3-4 schools. It's not immersive for those children. We all know better. Shameful.
There seems to be a clear difference of opinion on this--not just from the trolls posting here and on ArlNow, but from many people who sincerely believe that they are doing the best thing for their kids by putting them in the "best performing schools" (and then making sure the boundaries don't change). They don't see it as shameful because they don't feel responsible for creating or contributing to the problem. And since parents are a minority in Arlington, as long as parents keep fighting amongst themselves its difficult to get anything accomplished because APS can't effectively advocate to the rest of the community.
I'm not the PP but I appreciate the perspective. I have been active on all these South Arl threads and been trying to keep in mind that what is important to me (diversity, both race/ethnicity and socioeconomic) is not top priority for everyone. In a way, I have been very privileged to be able to make that a priority for my kids, because I know they will do fine regardless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is the rumor about the AP and the extra training for the principal true? Those of us zoned for this school would like to know.
It was announced today the the AP has resigned.
Anonymous wrote:So is the rumor about the AP and the extra training for the principal true? Those of us zoned for this school would like to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem isn't the ESOL kids. The problem is putting them all in the same 3-4 schools. It's not immersive for those children. We all know better. Shameful.
There seems to be a clear difference of opinion on this--not just from the trolls posting here and on ArlNow, but from many people who sincerely believe that they are doing the best thing for their kids by putting them in the "best performing schools" (and then making sure the boundaries don't change). They don't see it as shameful because they don't feel responsible for creating or contributing to the problem. And since parents are a minority in Arlington, as long as parents keep fighting amongst themselves its difficult to get anything accomplished because APS can't effectively advocate to the rest of the community.
Anonymous wrote:The problem isn't the ESOL kids. The problem is putting them all in the same 3-4 schools. It's not immersive for those children. We all know better. Shameful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ESOL children are not the problem. The fact that they are all shoe horned into a couple of schools is the problem.
Regardless of where you put them they are a much higher percentage then only 15 years a go and consume expensive services that were not budgeted properly.
I don't believe that is true. Back that up with a source please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ESOL children are not the problem. The fact that they are all shoe horned into a couple of schools is the problem.
Regardless of where you put them they are a much higher percentage then only 15 years a go and consume expensive services that were not budgeted properly.
Anonymous wrote:The ESOL children are not the problem. The fact that they are all shoe horned into a couple of schools is the problem.