Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Oh, that's original, accusing us of being un-American.
if the shoes fits...
Anonymous wrote:
Oh, that's original, accusing us of being un-American.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who don't get this film and who don't get Chris Kyle, fail to see that these American snipers look at their kills the way a surgeon looks at cancer - a disease to be rid of, cut out, so that lives are saved. Terrorists are a diseas and a cancer, and some men have the courage toshoot them dead. They don't feel any guilt or remorse or anything that an average person might feel.
People who don't get this film see the terrorists as the good guys. They truly believe we created them, so we should be empathetic.
We invaded Iraq and there was no link between 9/11 and Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction. How would you behave if your country was invaded? Would defending your soil be terrorism? Do you even think to ask these questions? Did the movie ask any of thee questions?
Does defending my soil include massacring satirists in Paris? How about school children? Throwing acid on women? Pushing gay people off buildings? Shooting teenage boys for watching a soccer match?
Nice folk, Al Qaeda and ISIS. How about you invite them over to have dinner with your wife and kids and express your empathy?
I did not support W's decision to invade Iraq, but at some point, US troops were primarily fighting Al Queda In Iraq - and that I support. I still support fighting/killing Al Queda and ISIL. So does our president.
As to who "created" Al Queda - THEY created themselves and they hate the west simply for being the west. They hate infidels. They hate women. The hate the house of Saud (even though the Saudis once supported salafis / radicals as somehow useful). Al Queda and ISIL are pure hatred.
So it bogles my mind how the American left can share that same hate towards a hero like Chris Kyle. Then again, the American left seems to harbor a lot of hate toward America.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous
Its sad to.me that was your takeaway, but I guess you heard what you wanted to hear/affirmed.some.script u had running in your head.
From earlier in the thread:
Best take more care when you speak ill of the dead - especially those that served our country and did away with pure evil.
You have NO idea what these guys go through so you can sit on your ass and shoot off at the mouth! THEY PROTECT OUR FREEDOM! Michael Moore sure as hell isn't protecting anything but you people flock to him like he is God. That is what is wrong with our country, I bet your tune will change when/if you need our WARRIORS right here in the US!!
We ask them to do atrocious thinks to protect our county, lack the ability to manage mental illness when they return, then you sit iny our warm homes with your high speed internet and degrees you don't use judging them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who don't get this film and who don't get Chris Kyle, fail to see that these American snipers look at their kills the way a surgeon looks at cancer - a disease to be rid of, cut out, so that lives are saved. Terrorists are a diseas and a cancer, and some men have the courage toshoot them dead. They don't feel any guilt or remorse or anything that an average person might feel.
People who don't get this film see the terrorists as the good guys. They truly believe we created them, so we should be empathetic.
We invaded Iraq and there was no link between 9/11 and Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction. How would you behave if your country was invaded? Would defending your soil be terrorism? Do you even think to ask these questions? Did the movie ask any of thee questions?
Does defending my soil include massacring satirists in Paris? How about school children? Throwing acid on women? Pushing gay people off buildings? Shooting teenage boys for watching a soccer match?
Nice folk, Al Qaeda and ISIS. How about you invite them over to have dinner with your wife and kids and express your empathy?
I did not support W's decision to invade Iraq, but at some point, US troops were primarily fighting Al Queda In Iraq - and that I support. I still support fighting/killing Al Queda and ISIL. So does our president.
As to who "created" Al Queda - THEY created themselves and they hate the west simply for being the west. They hate infidels. They hate women. The hate the house of Saud (even though the Saudis once supported salafis / radicals as somehow useful). Al Queda and ISIL are pure hatred.
So it bogles my mind how the American left can share that same hate towards a hero like Chris Kyle. Then again, the American left seems to harbor a lot of hate toward America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who don't get this film and who don't get Chris Kyle, fail to see that these American snipers look at their kills the way a surgeon looks at cancer - a disease to be rid of, cut out, so that lives are saved. Terrorists are a diseas and a cancer, and some men have the courage toshoot them dead. They don't feel any guilt or remorse or anything that an average person might feel.
People who don't get this film see the terrorists as the good guys. They truly believe we created them, so we should be empathetic.
We invaded Iraq and there was no link between 9/11 and Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction. How would you behave if your country was invaded? Would defending your soil be terrorism? Do you even think to ask these questions? Did the movie ask any of thee questions?
Does defending my soil include massacring satirists in Paris? How about school children? Throwing acid on women? Pushing gay people off buildings? Shooting teenage boys for watching a soccer match?
Nice folk, Al Qaeda and ISIS. How about you invite them over to have dinner with your wife and kids and express your empathy?
Anonymous
Its sad to.me that was your takeaway, but I guess you heard what you wanted to hear/affirmed.some.script u had running in your head.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there are many perspectives on the war. Isn't that the point? but Kyle was entitled to his.
Go back to the beginning of the thread. Apparently when we're talking about American Sniper, "many perspectives on the war" aren't allowed. All 100% heroes all the time! No flaws at all! Veterans are unimpeachable! Even when they lie their asses off constantly! Every war is justified and every enemy is a savage! Or else you're unamerican!
Etc.
No one said this. Stop trying to prove something that isn't there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:there are many perspectives on the war. Isn't that the point? but Kyle was entitled to his.
Go back to the beginning of the thread. Apparently when we're talking about American Sniper, "many perspectives on the war" aren't allowed. All 100% heroes all the time! No flaws at all! Veterans are unimpeachable! Even when they lie their asses off constantly! Every war is justified and every enemy is a savage! Or else you're unamerican!
Etc.
Anonymous wrote:there are many perspectives on the war. Isn't that the point? but Kyle was entitled to his.