Anonymous wrote:You can't measure racism. No cup holds it. No ruler can measure it.

SPLC knew they were going away if racism wasn't created, grown, marketef and nurtured by them. So they created a facade to keep their mission alive and their pay checks flowing.

People need to go to jail. A lot if them.

Anonymous wrote:You can't measure racism. No cup holds it. No ruler can measure it.

SPLC knew they were going away if racism wasn't created, grown, marketef and nurtured by them. So they created a facade to keep their mission alive and their pay checks flowing.

People need to go to jail. A lot if them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a simple way to cut through the BS around the SPLC indictment: look at independent evidence, scale, and basic logic. The ludicrous MAGA idea that the SPLC has been entirely responsible for "creating" or "funding" or "fomenting" white supremacist or extremist groups collapses the moment you compare it to what’s publicly documented.

1. The existence, structure, history and other details of these groups is deeply documented by courts, police, journalists, and victims; not just SPLC
If the SPLC vanished tomorrow, the existence of groups like the Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Ku Klux Klan factions, and prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood would still be established through:

- Countless federal and state indictments: There are extensive court filings that describe members, leaders, crimes, symbols, and organizational structures. These documents are produced by prosecutors and judges, not the SPLC. If they were SPLC constructs or if SPLC were a major funder of these organizations, that would have been established by the courts long ago.

- Extensive local and national journalism: Charlottesville’s “Unite the Right” rally was broadcast live. Reporters interviewed participants, photographed flags, and identified organizers. None of that came from SPLC.

- Law enforcement intelligence: DHS and FBI threat assessments have repeatedly identified white supremacist violence as a domestic security concern. These assessments are independent of any nonprofit.

- Victim reports and civil lawsuits: People harmed by these groups have filed suits, testified in court, and provided evidence. Their experiences don’t depend on SPLC’s existence.

If SPLC were the only source, you wouldn’t see multiple independent institutions all describing the same groups, symbols, and individuals.

2. Public events make "fabrication" impossible. Charlottesville alone utterly destroys the conspiracy theory. Hundreds of people marched with torches, chanting slogans, wearing identifiable group insignia. Their faces, voices, and actions were captured on video by dozens of outlets, and numerous individuals associated with the march have been identified, none of which have ever been employed by or paid by the SPLC.

The same goes for the extremist actors charged after January 6 - Oathkeepers, Proud Boys et cetera: their planning chats, leadership roles, and affiliations were exposed in court. SPLC did not fund their trip there, did not equip them with the zip ties, SPLC was not who built the gallows, Enrique Tarrio and other ringleaders were never on SPLC's payroll or in any way affiliated with SPLC.

You can’t “fabricate” hundreds of people on camera across multiple states and then convince courts, journalists, and victims to play along.

3. Informants don’t prove control; they prove the groups are real. The SPLC having informants inside extremist groups doesn’t mean they "run" or "fund" those groups. It means the groups exist and are dangerous enough to require monitoring.

A typical extremist group might have hundreds of members or sympathizers, dozens of active organizers, but only a handful of informants. Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for example have dozens of chapters scattered across multiple states, but SPLC probably only has one or two people giving them occasional tips and info. If an organization has 200 members and SPLC has 2 informants, that’s 1% information, 0% control.
By the moronic MAGA logic in this thread, the FBI "runs" the mafia because it flipped a few mobsters: obviously false. Informants are a sign of infiltration, not a sign of creation.

4. The conspiracy theory contradicts itself. To believe SPLC "funds" or "creates" extremist groups, you’d have to believe they simultaneously:

- Secretly bankroll violent extremists
- Publicly expose them
- Help law enforcement prosecute them (you read that right, they would be helping the police arrest themselves, which makes zero sense)
- Convince courts, journalists, and victims to corroborate the story
- Risk their entire donor base and legal standing

That’s not a theory, it’s a logical impossibility.

5. The scale problem alone debunks the claim. The extremist ecosystem in the U.S. includes:

- thousands of individuals
- multiple organizations and cells
- decades of documented activity
- crimes, arrests, and convictions across many states

The SPLC’s informant program involved:
- a small number of insiders
- providing information, not leadership or funding

The scale mismatch is enormous. A handful of informants cannot "create" a nationwide extremist movement with dozens of organizations and thousands of members nationally, which incidentally also predates the SPLC by decades.

Bottom line
The claim that the SPLC "invented" or "funded" or "fomented" extremist groups collapses under even basic scrutiny. Independent evidence, public events, court records, and sheer scale all point to the same conclusion: These groups are indeed real, dangerous, and documented by many institutions — not just the SPLC. Informants don’t create extremist groups; they expose them.

If you still think SPLC is the problem here, the your education has failed you and you clearly lack basic skills in logic and critical thinking skills. Before you post a "yabut" or go right back to "THe SpLC CrEAtED and FuNDs ThE KKK" post I suggest you either a. read this again until you get it, or b. go elsewhere, because you are either a. not very intelligent or b. you know damn well the SPLC did nothing wrong and you are a disingenuous liar giving cover to dangerous extremist organizations.

You don't have to be MAGA to understand that the SPLC is a place of employment for many people, and in order to ensure continued employment, they must have funding and stuff to do other than twiddle their thumbs all day. So there is all the incentive in the world for them to make jobs for themselves in this manner. And there are a lot of feds who also collect a paycheck by infiltrating groups, so they are all more than happy to work together to create these jobs for themselves. This happens in literally every industry, where people make problems in order to stay hired to fix said problems. That's why AI is gutting the workforce.

Thank you for outing yourself. Per the PP, it seems you are b. a disingenuous liar giving cover for dangerous extremist organizations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a simple way to cut through the BS around the SPLC indictment: look at independent evidence, scale, and basic logic. The ludicrous MAGA idea that the SPLC has been entirely responsible for "creating" or "funding" or "fomenting" white supremacist or extremist groups collapses the moment you compare it to what’s publicly documented.

1. The existence, structure, history and other details of these groups is deeply documented by courts, police, journalists, and victims; not just SPLC
If the SPLC vanished tomorrow, the existence of groups like the Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Ku Klux Klan factions, and prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood would still be established through:

- Countless federal and state indictments: There are extensive court filings that describe members, leaders, crimes, symbols, and organizational structures. These documents are produced by prosecutors and judges, not the SPLC. If they were SPLC constructs or if SPLC were a major funder of these organizations, that would have been established by the courts long ago.

- Extensive local and national journalism: Charlottesville’s “Unite the Right” rally was broadcast live. Reporters interviewed participants, photographed flags, and identified organizers. None of that came from SPLC.

- Law enforcement intelligence: DHS and FBI threat assessments have repeatedly identified white supremacist violence as a domestic security concern. These assessments are independent of any nonprofit.

- Victim reports and civil lawsuits: People harmed by these groups have filed suits, testified in court, and provided evidence. Their experiences don’t depend on SPLC’s existence.

If SPLC were the only source, you wouldn’t see multiple independent institutions all describing the same groups, symbols, and individuals.

2. Public events make "fabrication" impossible. Charlottesville alone utterly destroys the conspiracy theory. Hundreds of people marched with torches, chanting slogans, wearing identifiable group insignia. Their faces, voices, and actions were captured on video by dozens of outlets, and numerous individuals associated with the march have been identified, none of which have ever been employed by or paid by the SPLC.

The same goes for the extremist actors charged after January 6 - Oathkeepers, Proud Boys et cetera: their planning chats, leadership roles, and affiliations were exposed in court. SPLC did not fund their trip there, did not equip them with the zip ties, SPLC was not who built the gallows, Enrique Tarrio and other ringleaders were never on SPLC's payroll or in any way affiliated with SPLC.

You can’t “fabricate” hundreds of people on camera across multiple states and then convince courts, journalists, and victims to play along.

3. Informants don’t prove control; they prove the groups are real. The SPLC having informants inside extremist groups doesn’t mean they "run" or "fund" those groups. It means the groups exist and are dangerous enough to require monitoring.

A typical extremist group might have hundreds of members or sympathizers, dozens of active organizers, but only a handful of informants. Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for example have dozens of chapters scattered across multiple states, but SPLC probably only has one or two people giving them occasional tips and info. If an organization has 200 members and SPLC has 2 informants, that’s 1% information, 0% control.
By the moronic MAGA logic in this thread, the FBI "runs" the mafia because it flipped a few mobsters: obviously false. Informants are a sign of infiltration, not a sign of creation.

4. The conspiracy theory contradicts itself. To believe SPLC "funds" or "creates" extremist groups, you’d have to believe they simultaneously:

- Secretly bankroll violent extremists
- Publicly expose them
- Help law enforcement prosecute them (you read that right, they would be helping the police arrest themselves, which makes zero sense)
- Convince courts, journalists, and victims to corroborate the story
- Risk their entire donor base and legal standing

That’s not a theory, it’s a logical impossibility.

5. The scale problem alone debunks the claim. The extremist ecosystem in the U.S. includes:

- thousands of individuals
- multiple organizations and cells
- decades of documented activity
- crimes, arrests, and convictions across many states

The SPLC’s informant program involved:
- a small number of insiders
- providing information, not leadership or funding

The scale mismatch is enormous. A handful of informants cannot "create" a nationwide extremist movement with dozens of organizations and thousands of members nationally, which incidentally also predates the SPLC by decades.

Bottom line
The claim that the SPLC "invented" or "funded" or "fomented" extremist groups collapses under even basic scrutiny. Independent evidence, public events, court records, and sheer scale all point to the same conclusion: These groups are indeed real, dangerous, and documented by many institutions — not just the SPLC. Informants don’t create extremist groups; they expose them.

If you still think SPLC is the problem here, the your education has failed you and you clearly lack basic skills in logic and critical thinking skills. Before you post a "yabut" or go right back to "THe SpLC CrEAtED and FuNDs ThE KKK" post I suggest you either a. read this again until you get it, or b. go elsewhere, because you are either a. not very intelligent or b. you know damn well the SPLC did nothing wrong and you are a disingenuous liar giving cover to dangerous extremist organizations.

You don't have to be MAGA to understand that the SPLC is a place of employment for many people, and in order to ensure continued employment, they must have funding and stuff to do other than twiddle their thumbs all day. So there is all the incentive in the world for them to make jobs for themselves in this manner. And there are a lot of feds who also collect a paycheck by infiltrating groups, so they are all more than happy to work together to create these jobs for themselves. This happens in literally every industry, where people make problems in order to stay hired to fix said problems. That's why AI is gutting the workforce.

You’ll be taken seriously if you stop stepping over stacks of $100.00 bills as far as the eye can see (e.g., defense industry or pharmaceutical industry would be great places to start) to scrape a grimy penny off the ground (alleged corruption at SPLC, a case that will die with a whimper just like every single other attempt to blame “the radical left” for so many imaginary crimes).

Hillary convicted and imprisoned yet?

Hunter Biden convicted and imprisoned yet?

DOGE find that $3 trillion in fraud yet?

Inflation at all-time lows yet?

Today’s Republican Party: All talk, no facts for the 75 million mouthbreathers too incompetent to realize they’re voting every time against their own interests.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a simple way to cut through the BS around the SPLC indictment: look at independent evidence, scale, and basic logic. The ludicrous MAGA idea that the SPLC has been entirely responsible for "creating" or "funding" or "fomenting" white supremacist or extremist groups collapses the moment you compare it to what’s publicly documented.

1. The existence, structure, history and other details of these groups is deeply documented by courts, police, journalists, and victims; not just SPLC
If the SPLC vanished tomorrow, the existence of groups like the Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Ku Klux Klan factions, and prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood would still be established through:

- Countless federal and state indictments: There are extensive court filings that describe members, leaders, crimes, symbols, and organizational structures. These documents are produced by prosecutors and judges, not the SPLC. If they were SPLC constructs or if SPLC were a major funder of these organizations, that would have been established by the courts long ago.

- Extensive local and national journalism: Charlottesville’s “Unite the Right” rally was broadcast live. Reporters interviewed participants, photographed flags, and identified organizers. None of that came from SPLC.

- Law enforcement intelligence: DHS and FBI threat assessments have repeatedly identified white supremacist violence as a domestic security concern. These assessments are independent of any nonprofit.

- Victim reports and civil lawsuits: People harmed by these groups have filed suits, testified in court, and provided evidence. Their experiences don’t depend on SPLC’s existence.

If SPLC were the only source, you wouldn’t see multiple independent institutions all describing the same groups, symbols, and individuals.

2. Public events make "fabrication" impossible. Charlottesville alone utterly destroys the conspiracy theory. Hundreds of people marched with torches, chanting slogans, wearing identifiable group insignia. Their faces, voices, and actions were captured on video by dozens of outlets, and numerous individuals associated with the march have been identified, none of which have ever been employed by or paid by the SPLC.

The same goes for the extremist actors charged after January 6 - Oathkeepers, Proud Boys et cetera: their planning chats, leadership roles, and affiliations were exposed in court. SPLC did not fund their trip there, did not equip them with the zip ties, SPLC was not who built the gallows, Enrique Tarrio and other ringleaders were never on SPLC's payroll or in any way affiliated with SPLC.

You can’t “fabricate” hundreds of people on camera across multiple states and then convince courts, journalists, and victims to play along.

3. Informants don’t prove control; they prove the groups are real. The SPLC having informants inside extremist groups doesn’t mean they "run" or "fund" those groups. It means the groups exist and are dangerous enough to require monitoring.

A typical extremist group might have hundreds of members or sympathizers, dozens of active organizers, but only a handful of informants. Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for example have dozens of chapters scattered across multiple states, but SPLC probably only has one or two people giving them occasional tips and info. If an organization has 200 members and SPLC has 2 informants, that’s 1% information, 0% control.
By the moronic MAGA logic in this thread, the FBI "runs" the mafia because it flipped a few mobsters: obviously false. Informants are a sign of infiltration, not a sign of creation.

4. The conspiracy theory contradicts itself. To believe SPLC "funds" or "creates" extremist groups, you’d have to believe they simultaneously:

- Secretly bankroll violent extremists
- Publicly expose them
- Help law enforcement prosecute them (you read that right, they would be helping the police arrest themselves, which makes zero sense)
- Convince courts, journalists, and victims to corroborate the story
- Risk their entire donor base and legal standing

That’s not a theory, it’s a logical impossibility.

5. The scale problem alone debunks the claim. The extremist ecosystem in the U.S. includes:

- thousands of individuals
- multiple organizations and cells
- decades of documented activity
- crimes, arrests, and convictions across many states

The SPLC’s informant program involved:
- a small number of insiders
- providing information, not leadership or funding

The scale mismatch is enormous. A handful of informants cannot "create" a nationwide extremist movement with dozens of organizations and thousands of members nationally, which incidentally also predates the SPLC by decades.

Bottom line
The claim that the SPLC "invented" or "funded" or "fomented" extremist groups collapses under even basic scrutiny. Independent evidence, public events, court records, and sheer scale all point to the same conclusion: These groups are indeed real, dangerous, and documented by many institutions — not just the SPLC. Informants don’t create extremist groups; they expose them.

If you still think SPLC is the problem here, the your education has failed you and you clearly lack basic skills in logic and critical thinking skills. Before you post a "yabut" or go right back to "THe SpLC CrEAtED and FuNDs ThE KKK" post I suggest you either a. read this again until you get it, or b. go elsewhere, because you are either a. not very intelligent or b. you know damn well the SPLC did nothing wrong and you are a disingenuous liar giving cover to dangerous extremist organizations.

You don't have to be MAGA to understand that the SPLC is a place of employment for many people, and in order to ensure continued employment, they must have funding and stuff to do other than twiddle their thumbs all day. So there is all the incentive in the world for them to make jobs for themselves in this manner. And there are a lot of feds who also collect a paycheck by infiltrating groups, so they are all more than happy to work together to create these jobs for themselves. This happens in literally every industry, where people make problems in order to stay hired to fix said problems. That's why AI is gutting the workforce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a simple way to cut through the BS around the SPLC indictment: look at independent evidence, scale, and basic logic. The ludicrous MAGA idea that the SPLC has been entirely responsible for "creating" or "funding" or "fomenting" white supremacist or extremist groups collapses the moment you compare it to what’s publicly documented.

1. The existence, structure, history and other details of these groups is deeply documented by courts, police, journalists, and victims; not just SPLC
If the SPLC vanished tomorrow, the existence of groups like the Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Ku Klux Klan factions, and prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood would still be established through:

- Countless federal and state indictments: There are extensive court filings that describe members, leaders, crimes, symbols, and organizational structures. These documents are produced by prosecutors and judges, not the SPLC. If they were SPLC constructs or if SPLC were a major funder of these organizations, that would have been established by the courts long ago.

- Extensive local and national journalism: Charlottesville’s “Unite the Right” rally was broadcast live. Reporters interviewed participants, photographed flags, and identified organizers. None of that came from SPLC.

- Law enforcement intelligence: DHS and FBI threat assessments have repeatedly identified white supremacist violence as a domestic security concern. These assessments are independent of any nonprofit.

- Victim reports and civil lawsuits: People harmed by these groups have filed suits, testified in court, and provided evidence. Their experiences don’t depend on SPLC’s existence.

If SPLC were the only source, you wouldn’t see multiple independent institutions all describing the same groups, symbols, and individuals.

2. Public events make "fabrication" impossible. Charlottesville alone utterly destroys the conspiracy theory. Hundreds of people marched with torches, chanting slogans, wearing identifiable group insignia. Their faces, voices, and actions were captured on video by dozens of outlets, and numerous individuals associated with the march have been identified, none of which have ever been employed by or paid by the SPLC.

The same goes for the extremist actors charged after January 6 - Oathkeepers, Proud Boys et cetera: their planning chats, leadership roles, and affiliations were exposed in court. SPLC did not fund their trip there, did not equip them with the zip ties, SPLC was not who built the gallows, Enrique Tarrio and other ringleaders were never on SPLC's payroll or in any way affiliated with SPLC.

You can’t “fabricate” hundreds of people on camera across multiple states and then convince courts, journalists, and victims to play along.

3. Informants don’t prove control; they prove the groups are real. The SPLC having informants inside extremist groups doesn’t mean they "run" or "fund" those groups. It means the groups exist and are dangerous enough to require monitoring.

A typical extremist group might have hundreds of members or sympathizers, dozens of active organizers, but only a handful of informants. Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for example have dozens of chapters scattered across multiple states, but SPLC probably only has one or two people giving them occasional tips and info. If an organization has 200 members and SPLC has 2 informants, that’s 1% information, 0% control.
By the moronic MAGA logic in this thread, the FBI "runs" the mafia because it flipped a few mobsters: obviously false. Informants are a sign of infiltration, not a sign of creation.

4. The conspiracy theory contradicts itself. To believe SPLC "funds" or "creates" extremist groups, you’d have to believe they simultaneously:

- Secretly bankroll violent extremists
- Publicly expose them
- Help law enforcement prosecute them (you read that right, they would be helping the police arrest themselves, which makes zero sense)
- Convince courts, journalists, and victims to corroborate the story
- Risk their entire donor base and legal standing

That’s not a theory, it’s a logical impossibility.

5. The scale problem alone debunks the claim. The extremist ecosystem in the U.S. includes:

- thousands of individuals
- multiple organizations and cells
- decades of documented activity
- crimes, arrests, and convictions across many states

The SPLC’s informant program involved:
- a small number of insiders
- providing information, not leadership or funding

The scale mismatch is enormous. A handful of informants cannot "create" a nationwide extremist movement with dozens of organizations and thousands of members nationally, which incidentally also predates the SPLC by decades.

Bottom line
The claim that the SPLC "invented" or "funded" or "fomented" extremist groups collapses under even basic scrutiny. Independent evidence, public events, court records, and sheer scale all point to the same conclusion: These groups are indeed real, dangerous, and documented by many institutions — not just the SPLC. Informants don’t create extremist groups; they expose them.

If you still think SPLC is the problem here, the your education has failed you and you clearly lack basic skills in logic and critical thinking skills. Before you post a "yabut" or go right back to "THe SpLC CrEAtED and FuNDs ThE KKK" post I suggest you either a. read this again until you get it, or b. go elsewhere, because you are either a. not very intelligent or b. you know damn well the SPLC did nothing wrong and you are a disingenuous liar giving cover to dangerous extremist organizations.

You don't have to be MAGA to understand that the SPLC is a place of employment for many people, and in order to ensure continued employment, they must have funding and stuff to do other than twiddle their thumbs all day. So there is all the incentive in the world for them to make jobs for themselves in this manner. And there are a lot of feds who also collect a paycheck by infiltrating groups, so they are all more than happy to work together to create these jobs for themselves. This happens in literally every industry, where people make problems in order to stay hired to fix said problems. That's why AI is gutting the workforce.

Anonymous wrote:You can't measure racism. No cup holds it. No ruler can measure it.

SPLC knew they were going away if racism wasn't created, grown, marketef and nurtured by them. So they created a facade to keep their mission alive and their pay checks flowing.

People need to go to jail. A lot if them.

Anonymous wrote:I just found this article which explains what the SPLC was up to. Please read it:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-fires-analysts-richmond-memo-catholic-extremist-ideology/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

In essense, they were attacking Roman Catholics. The above article states,

"...The FBI "investigated, monitored, tracked and scrutinized traditional Catholics who had engaged in no criminal misconduct," the report claims.

The report also alleged that the FBI Richmond office showed a "misplaced reliance" on the Southern Poverty Law Center in its analysis..."

I 100% know of ethical, reasonable, moderate individuals who are Roman Catholic and who have found themselves relentlessly tracked for no apparent reason they can discern. They lead quiet, law abiding lives.

This news is beginning to bring some understanding as to why these individuals are being followed and monitored as if they were criminals. And good, I'm glad those idiots at the FBI got fired. Sounds like that SPLC organization is part of the Progressive movement seeking to dismantle traditional America to make way for their own world views.

Anonymous wrote:There’s a simple way to cut through the BS around the SPLC indictment: look at independent evidence, scale, and basic logic. The ludicrous MAGA idea that the SPLC has been entirely responsible for "creating" or "funding" or "fomenting" white supremacist or extremist groups collapses the moment you compare it to what’s publicly documented.

1. The existence, structure, history and other details of these groups is deeply documented by courts, police, journalists, and victims; not just SPLC
If the SPLC vanished tomorrow, the existence of groups like the Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Ku Klux Klan factions, and prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood would still be established through:

- Countless federal and state indictments: There are extensive court filings that describe members, leaders, crimes, symbols, and organizational structures. These documents are produced by prosecutors and judges, not the SPLC. If they were SPLC constructs or if SPLC were a major funder of these organizations, that would have been established by the courts long ago.

- Extensive local and national journalism: Charlottesville’s “Unite the Right” rally was broadcast live. Reporters interviewed participants, photographed flags, and identified organizers. None of that came from SPLC.

- Law enforcement intelligence: DHS and FBI threat assessments have repeatedly identified white supremacist violence as a domestic security concern. These assessments are independent of any nonprofit.

- Victim reports and civil lawsuits: People harmed by these groups have filed suits, testified in court, and provided evidence. Their experiences don’t depend on SPLC’s existence.

If SPLC were the only source, you wouldn’t see multiple independent institutions all describing the same groups, symbols, and individuals.

2. Public events make "fabrication" impossible. Charlottesville alone utterly destroys the conspiracy theory. Hundreds of people marched with torches, chanting slogans, wearing identifiable group insignia. Their faces, voices, and actions were captured on video by dozens of outlets, and numerous individuals associated with the march have been identified, none of which have ever been employed by or paid by the SPLC.

The same goes for the extremist actors charged after January 6 - Oathkeepers, Proud Boys et cetera: their planning chats, leadership roles, and affiliations were exposed in court. SPLC did not fund their trip there, did not equip them with the zip ties, SPLC was not who built the gallows, Enrique Tarrio and other ringleaders were never on SPLC's payroll or in any way affiliated with SPLC.

You can’t “fabricate” hundreds of people on camera across multiple states and then convince courts, journalists, and victims to play along.

3. Informants don’t prove control; they prove the groups are real. The SPLC having informants inside extremist groups doesn’t mean they "run" or "fund" those groups. It means the groups exist and are dangerous enough to require monitoring.

A typical extremist group might have hundreds of members or sympathizers, dozens of active organizers, but only a handful of informants. Proud Boys and Oathkeepers for example have dozens of chapters scattered across multiple states, but SPLC probably only has one or two people giving them occasional tips and info. If an organization has 200 members and SPLC has 2 informants, that’s 1% information, 0% control.
By the moronic MAGA logic in this thread, the FBI "runs" the mafia because it flipped a few mobsters: obviously false. Informants are a sign of infiltration, not a sign of creation.

4. The conspiracy theory contradicts itself. To believe SPLC "funds" or "creates" extremist groups, you’d have to believe they simultaneously:

- Secretly bankroll violent extremists
- Publicly expose them
- Help law enforcement prosecute them (you read that right, they would be helping the police arrest themselves, which makes zero sense)
- Convince courts, journalists, and victims to corroborate the story
- Risk their entire donor base and legal standing

That’s not a theory, it’s a logical impossibility.

5. The scale problem alone debunks the claim. The extremist ecosystem in the U.S. includes:

- thousands of individuals
- multiple organizations and cells
- decades of documented activity
- crimes, arrests, and convictions across many states

The SPLC’s informant program involved:
- a small number of insiders
- providing information, not leadership or funding

The scale mismatch is enormous. A handful of informants cannot "create" a nationwide extremist movement with dozens of organizations and thousands of members nationally, which incidentally also predates the SPLC by decades.

Bottom line
The claim that the SPLC "invented" or "funded" or "fomented" extremist groups collapses under even basic scrutiny. Independent evidence, public events, court records, and sheer scale all point to the same conclusion: These groups are indeed real, dangerous, and documented by many institutions — not just the SPLC. Informants don’t create extremist groups; they expose them.

If you still think SPLC is the problem here, the your education has failed you and you clearly lack basic skills in logic and critical thinking skills. Before you post a "yabut" or go right back to "THe SpLC CrEAtED and FuNDs ThE KKK" post I suggest you either a. read this again until you get it, or b. go elsewhere, because you are either a. not very intelligent or b. you know damn well the SPLC did nothing wrong and you are a disingenuous liar giving cover to dangerous extremist organizations.

Interesting that DOJ indicted SPLC (which has been around since the early 1970’s) for doing the work they should be doing but are too busy indicting Trumps political enemies. This should be interesting as it will be prosecuted in Alabama. Essentially Trump now wants to protect entities like the KKK, Proud Boys, Neo-Nazi’s, etc and screw over NGO’s trying to do the right thing.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that DOJ indicted SPLC (which has been around since the early 1970’s) for doing the work they should be doing but are too busy indicting Trumps political enemies. This should be interesting as it will be prosecuted in Alabama. Essentially Trump now wants to protect entities like the KKK, Proud Boys, Neo-Nazi’s, etc and screw over NGO’s trying to do the right thing.