Anonymous
05/22/2026 09:54
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
100%! everyone already submitted their comments in the form last year. They didn’t present any summary/analysis of those comments, any new stats, they still lack detailed knowledge of the neighborhoods. It was understandable when the whole county was for review, but not when it narrowed down to a small chunk.
That’s how it was at South County too. They couldn’t even give numbers/percentages for capacity projections with each proposed move.
They come across as unprepared, unmotivated, and defensive in these meetings. Reid seems to have no talent for recruiting strong people who are remotely up to the task of overseeing these follow-up boundary studies. It’s embarrassing just how bad these people are at their jobs.
+1
Anonymous
05/21/2026 20:23
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
100%! everyone already submitted their comments in the form last year. They didn’t present any summary/analysis of those comments, any new stats, they still lack detailed knowledge of the neighborhoods. It was understandable when the whole county was for review, but not when it narrowed down to a small chunk.
That’s how it was at South County too. They couldn’t even give numbers/percentages for capacity projections with each proposed move.
They come across as unprepared, unmotivated, and defensive in these meetings. Reid seems to have no talent for recruiting strong people who are remotely up to the task of overseeing these follow-up boundary studies. It’s embarrassing just how bad these people are at their jobs.
Anonymous
05/21/2026 12:03
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
100%! everyone already submitted their comments in the form last year. They didn’t present any summary/analysis of those comments, any new stats, they still lack detailed knowledge of the neighborhoods. It was understandable when the whole county was for review, but not when it narrowed down to a small chunk.
That’s how it was at South County too. They couldn’t even give numbers/percentages for capacity projections with each proposed move.
Anonymous
05/21/2026 08:56
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
100%! everyone already submitted their comments in the form last year. They didn’t present any summary/analysis of those comments, any new stats, they still lack detailed knowledge of the neighborhoods. It was understandable when the whole county was for review, but not when it narrowed down to a small chunk.
Maybe it’s about time to replace the School Board and Superintendent responsible for such nonsense. Just a thought.
Anonymous
05/21/2026 07:57
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
100%! everyone already submitted their comments in the form last year. They didn’t present any summary/analysis of those comments, any new stats, they still lack detailed knowledge of the neighborhoods. It was understandable when the whole county was for review, but not when it narrowed down to a small chunk.
Anonymous
05/21/2026 06:53
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.
They also said they weren’t recording the meeting. So you might have offered feedback there but they weren’t taking down the comments. It felt like a check the box exercise.
Anonymous
05/21/2026 06:17
Subject: Re:FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools.
Anonymous wrote:Did it sound like they were going to move those Rolling Valley townhouses to WSHS (from Key/Lewis)? I think in the approved boundary version they were at RV/Key/Lewis.
It sounded like this: “ Thank you, your comment has been noted, please fill out the online form.”
AI could have been running the meeting for the amount of human feedback that was given.