Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone fired for not meeting PT requirements should be allowed to challenge Hegseth to single unarmed combat. If they win they get to keep their job

Hegseth can’t meet the requirements himself.

So he skips pull ups and leg day.

I've seen that video before. Could it be that one pull up in that four second video is the last of a bunch of pull ups?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It isn't illegal to possess them anymore and Judge Pirro said she wasn't going to prosecute them anymore, and yet, they are still taking the guns.

Prohibited people can’t possess firearms anywhere.

Stolen firearms possessed illegally are, by definition, against the law.

Possession of a handgun under the age of 21 is illegal in D.C.

Possession of a large capacity magazine by almost anyone is a felony in D.C.

Are you even remotely aware of the laws?

And Trump said they were not going to prosecute gun laws in DC anymore. Clearly he meant just for White people.

Source please? I’ll wait.

https://wtop.com/dc/2025/08/us-attorney-will-no-longer-bring-felony-charges-against-people-for-carrying-rifles-or-shotguns-in-dc/

Anonymous wrote:“ It was striking how many times President Trump tried to get the assembled military leaders to break character and laugh when he mocked his predecessors or used his usual political lines. It was also striking how often they resisted before Trump finally threw in the towel.”

WH reporter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is possibly the biggest 'coulda been an email' meeting ever. Even just a Teams meeting. Somebody get DOGE.

It could have been a Signal chat.

Thread winner!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happened at this meeting? What did he announce? What did Hegseth talk about?

Twice a year mandatory HEIGHT EXAMS

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5528556-hegseth-warrior-ethos-physical-fitness/

I think it means the "height AND weight" standards --- meaning you have a certain weight standard based on your height. They are not expecting people to grow taller, or suspicious that people are shrinking out of normal height.

So they are going to fire people with too much muscle?

There is a way around that. Been using it for years. Tape test. When I worked in a DOD office, the fittest guy there failed the height/weight because he was so much muscle. There is some measurement they use. (This was before the Army went "woke.") He passed and that will be the same here, I'm sure.

BMI is what they use and it’s a terrible way to measure anyone who is athletic. Muscle is dense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think any Generals will resign as a result of this meeting? Or will they all capitulate? Or will some organize a coup? I think those are the only three choices available.

Hopefully Option 4: Wait it out. Maybe, just maybe some externality will change the landscape before Trump sics (more) troops on citizens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone fired for not meeting PT requirements should be allowed to challenge Hegseth to single unarmed combat. If they win they get to keep their job

Hegseth can’t meet the requirements himself.

So he skips pull ups and leg day.

I've seen that video before. Could it be that one pull up in that four second video is the last of a bunch of pull ups?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see headlines on The Hill, NY Times and AP News but nothing (NADA) on FauxNews. Am I missing something?

They initially were reporting, but I think they saw how embarrassing it was and decided to save face.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s not wrong about the standards for combat arms.

The rest of it sounds crazy.

I agree. I don't mind high physical standards for the rank and file or officers in combat roles. Top generals... eh. They're old. They're valued for their experience and maturity, not their ability to do push-ups.

And the rest is grounds for impeachment and the 25th. No politicization of the military. No going after one's own country. What the hell.

NGL, I was always a little nervous about my 52 year old DH testing alongside 25 year olds and having to prove he was still fast and strong. These people are all competitive. That kind of thing gets scary as we get older.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s not wrong about the standards for combat arms.

The rest of it sounds crazy.

I agree. I don't mind high physical standards for the rank and file or officers in combat roles. Top generals... eh. They're old. They're valued for their experience and maturity, not their ability to do push-ups.

And the rest is grounds for impeachment and the 25th. No politicization of the military. No going after one's own country. What the hell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone fired for not meeting PT requirements should be allowed to challenge Hegseth to single unarmed combat. If they win they get to keep their job

Hegseth can’t meet the requirements himself.

So he skips pull ups and leg day.

Anonymous wrote:We are going to end up in a significant military conflict before this administration is over, it sounds crazy but I see it coming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think any Generals will resign as a result of this meeting? Or will they all capitulate? Or will some organize a coup? I think those are the only three choices available.

Hopefully Option 4: Wait it out. Maybe, just maybe some externality will change the landscape before Trump sics (more) troops on citizens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone fired for not meeting PT requirements should be allowed to challenge Hegseth to single unarmed combat. If they win they get to keep their job

Hegseth can’t meet the requirements himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happened at this meeting? What did he announce? What did Hegseth talk about?

Twice a year mandatory HEIGHT EXAMS

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5528556-hegseth-warrior-ethos-physical-fitness/

I think it means the "height AND weight" standards --- meaning you have a certain weight standard based on your height. They are not expecting people to grow taller, or suspicious that people are shrinking out of normal height.

So they are going to fire people with too much muscle?

There is a way around that. Been using it for years. Tape test. When I worked in a DOD office, the fittest guy there failed the height/weight because he was so much muscle. There is some measurement they use. (This was before the Army went "woke.") He passed and that will be the same here, I'm sure.