Anonymous wrote:The Week Ahead:
Tuesday, March 11:
Landon (2-0) vs. Gilman (1-1)
St. Albans (0-2) at Potomac School (VA) (1-0)
GZ (0-1) at McDonogh (MD) (
DeMatha (0-1) vs. Severn
PVI (1-0) vs. Archbishop Spalding
St. Andrews Episcopal (MD) (0-0) vs. The Heights (MD) (1-0)
Wednesday, March 12:
Bullis (4-0) at St. Paul’s (MD) (1-0)
Thursday, March 13:
SSSAS (2-0) vs. Christ School (VA) (3-1)
G Prep (2-0) at Loyola Blakefield (MD)
GC (2-0) at St. Albans (0-2)
SJC (0-2) at Gilman
PVI (1-0) at Christchurch (0-0)
Episcopal HS (0-0) at American Heritage Plantation (FL) (5-1)
The Heights (1-0) vs. Ponte Vedra (9-1) (FL)
Friday, March 14:
GZ (0-1) at Bishop O’Connell
DeMatha (0-1) vs. St. Mary’s Ryken
Saturday, March 15:
Landon (2-0) at Haverford School (PA)*
Bullis (4-0) at Episcopal Academy (PA)*
Episcopal HS (0-0) at Springside Chestnut (PA)*
St. Albans (0-2) at Germantown Academy (PA)*
G Prep (2-0) at Malvern Prep (PA)* (1-0)
SSSAS (2-0) at Penn Charter (PA)*
The Heights (1-0) vs. Norfolk Academy (VA) (0-0)
GZ (0-1) vs. Ponte Vedra (9-1) (FL)
*IAC/Inter-IAC Lacrosse Challenge at Haverford School
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what are the odds for thursday bullis vs dematha game ?
Wednesday, March 5:
GC vs. Spire Academy
GC goes up early and takes care of business easily 16-7
Thursday, March 6:
Bullis vs. DeMatha
Bullis -6
Dematha will win this game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Landon's guy is excellent, so the backup had no chance.
Landon's offense is bad this year.
Kubick thinks he can run the same offense that he ran last year with the firepower from the 2024 team.
Make adjustments!
Anonymous wrote:never even heard of Spire Academy, where are they from?
Anonymous wrote:Landon's guy is excellent, so the backup had no chance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what are the odds for thursday bullis vs dematha game ?
Wednesday, March 5:
GC vs. Spire Academy
GC goes up early and takes care of business easily 16-7
Thursday, March 6:
Bullis vs. DeMatha
Bullis -6
Yup. Especially as Severn's FOGO was out and they were going against the 2nd string for even that. No guarantee they'll see anything close to that disparity again. Whelp.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You may need help as you missed the point of my post entirely. There are probably 10 posts on here about Landon missing players. Ok, the Severn player missing was probably the most critical to the game outcome. Not an excuse, but an explanation. Landon deserved to win, but Severn deserves a lot of credit for staying in the game with 17 fewer face off wins. The record book doesn’t care about missing players. You win or lose and move on.
Why would I need help if I missed the point of your poorly written post. It's up to you to be a better writer for the reader to understand. Throwing in an insult doesn't help either. Then you say Severn needs credit but the record book doesn't care. That's correct and you repeated my post.
Agree. Move on.
If Landon won 17 of 18 face offs but only beat Severn by 2 goals, they could be in for a long year.