Anonymous wrote:I don’t know if you’ve been around an 18 month old but someone that’s not good with kids or hates kids wouldn’t be great at handling driving and picking up a toddler (who doesn’t even know them) by themselves.

Scott decorated the nursery with fishing decor and they both came up with the name Connor. Who took all those nice pics of pregnant Laci? Scott. Scott’s happy in all the pics as well. There’s no indication they weren’t a happy expectant family. Yes, he cheated and lied that he wasn’t married and that’s wrong but he only did that for sex. Leaving Laci for Amber because he didn’t want the responsibility of a kid makes no sense because Amber was a single mom. He wanted to ditch being a father to be a stepdad? Amber was financially looking for a father figure for her daughter as the last man dumped her and sued her for lying about his paternity of the little girl. Scott was probably going to dump her by January once he figured out she wanted a full time stepdad figure

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think Laci found out about Amber and they got in a fight and he accidentally killed her?

It still doesn’t explain how 150
Lb Laci and 200+ lb Scott fit on a tiny fishing boat without capsizing or anyone seeing that show. Her body would’ve floated if he buried it where he was fishing. It was shallow water specifically for fishing

I don’t think it would have been an accident he would have killed her in a rage. She and the baby were keeping him from the life he really wanted.

What life that he really wanted? Laci was a homemaker who worshipped Scott. She knew about his past affairs and was young and beautiful enough to divorce him and find another husband but she didn’t care.

Scott’s from San Diego Which is hours away from Modesto. Californias huge. He could’ve moved away and never looked back. Why would he have to kill her? He could’ve made sure she was on birth control if he was really concerned about kids. They waited 5 years to have kids and recently purchased that house. The idea that he didn’t want to be a father is the only motive the prosecution could use because there was no history of DV between Laci and Scott and Laci never told her family that she feared her life around Scott. Scott even picked up Amber’s 18 month old from daycare a few times in the weeks prior. She let a man she knew for only a week pick up her daughter from school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it.

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever.

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.

Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.

Yes, it most certainly is.

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases. The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?

Uh because many many people saw him, and if he tried to lie it would make him look even worse? C'mon, you can't say that makes him innocent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

A bunch of text like police witness statements and timelines and evidence pieces like a watch and safe.

Where’s the conspiracy in posting things that were connected to the initial Laci Peterson search? Scott was arrested in April. The neighborhood and Lacis family thought the burglar van had something to do with Laci and they believed she was kidnapped not killed. It wasn’t until Amber Frey went public with the calls that the public assumed the worst that Laci was dead and Scott did it. All because the Pearl clutchers couldn’t imagine cheating and lying was not a scandal implying murder

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think Laci found out about Amber and they got in a fight and he accidentally killed her?

It still doesn’t explain how 150
Lb Laci and 200+ lb Scott fit on a tiny fishing boat without capsizing or anyone seeing that show. Her body would’ve floated if he buried it where he was fishing. It was shallow water specifically for fishing

I don’t think it would have been an accident he would have killed her in a rage. She and the baby were keeping him from the life he really wanted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

A bunch of text like police witness statements and timelines and evidence pieces like a watch and safe.

Where’s the conspiracy in posting things that were connected to the initial Laci Peterson search? Scott was arrested in April. The neighborhood and Lacis family thought the burglar van had something to do with Laci and they believed she was kidnapped not killed. It wasn’t until Amber Frey went public with the calls that the public assumed the worst that Laci was dead and Scott did it. All because the Pearl clutchers couldn’t imagine cheating and lying was not a scandal implying murder

Not reading your copy and pasted bullshit. This case has been decided.

Anonymous wrote:Do you think Laci found out about Amber and they got in a fight and he accidentally killed her?

It still doesn’t explain how 150
Lb Laci and 200+ lb Scott fit on a tiny fishing boat without capsizing or anyone seeing that show. Her body would’ve floated if he buried it where he was fishing. It was shallow water specifically for fishing

Anonymous wrote:Do you think Laci found out about Amber and they got in a fight and he accidentally killed her?

It still doesn’t explain how 150
Lb Laci and 200+ lb Scott fit on a tiny fishing boat without capsizing or anyone seeing that show. Her body would’ve floated if he buried it where he was fishing. It was shallow water specifically for fishing

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

A bunch of text like police witness statements and timelines and evidence pieces like a watch and safe.

Where’s the conspiracy in posting things that were connected to the initial Laci Peterson search? Scott was arrested in April. The neighborhood and Lacis family thought the burglar van had something to do with Laci and they believed she was kidnapped not killed. It wasn’t until Amber Frey went public with the calls that the public assumed the worst that Laci was dead and Scott did it. All because the Pearl clutchers couldn’t imagine cheating and lying was not a scandal implying murder

Not reading your copy and pasted bullshit. This case has been decided.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You think he’s going to tell cops where he buried a body just hours before that afternoon?

Get real.

Do you think he’d murder Laci the day of her family Christmas gathering and the day before her Christmas party?

Why would anyone premeditate first degree murder with such circumstances like this? He was apparently able to watch Martha Stewart and log on to the computer that morning to look up sunflower umbrellas, tote bags, and Gap scarves but left the mop and bucket and dish rags around the house and told cops he did laundry and went fishing that day.

A real suspect that premeditated murder wouldn’t act that way.

Laci’s stepdad went fishing that same morning so no, it wasn’t unusual on a Christmas Eve in California to go out on a boat ride

I don't think he planned it which is why there are so many ends that aren't neatly tied up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

A bunch of text like police witness statements and timelines and evidence pieces like a watch and safe.

Where’s the conspiracy in posting things that were connected to the initial Laci Peterson search? Scott was arrested in April. The neighborhood and Lacis family thought the burglar van had something to do with Laci and they believed she was kidnapped not killed. It wasn’t until Amber Frey went public with the calls that the public assumed the worst that Laci was dead and Scott did it. All because the Pearl clutchers couldn’t imagine cheating and lying was not a scandal implying murder

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body

You’re just copying and pasting a bunch of text from various insanely biased conspiracy theory type sites. You’re not exactly engaging in authentic dialogue here contributing to a discussion.

Anonymous wrote:Negative again. It’s fascinating how people are responding with who they think I am instead of what I’m posting. I’m not a relative or in love with Scott nor are cheaters my type but I think he was unfairly prosecuted.

It scares me that people with Salem witch trial/mob Justice thinking are capable of serving on juries. There’s zero logic that prevails in this country.

A killer isn’t going to tell cops exactly where he buried a body