Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
There is no agreement to debate on Fox, you Lying Liar who Lies, and casting Harris stepping up as the candidate as an attempt to broach the existing debate agreement is, well, weird.
Reading comprehension amrite? The agreement was made between Biden/Harris campaign with Trump campaign that BIDEN will debate Trump on ABC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
There is no agreement to debate on Fox, you Lying Liar who Lies, and casting Harris stepping up as the candidate as an attempt to broach the existing debate agreement is, well, weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.
Example of becoming emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.
Example of becoming emotional.
Emotional? Both campaigns are strategizing to win. Where emotional is of assistance, presumably they both try to make an emotional appeal. The debate equation seems pretty straightforward without any emotions involved.
Trump is better off not showing to this high profile event up to avoid losing supporters. Harris is better off showing up to this high profile event to gain supporters.
I was talking about the poster who said “you sound scared.” They were being emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.
Example of becoming emotional.
Emotional? Both campaigns are strategizing to win. Where emotional is of assistance, presumably they both try to make an emotional appeal. The debate equation seems pretty straightforward without any emotions involved.
Trump is better off not showing to this high profile event up to avoid losing supporters. Harris is better off showing up to this high profile event to gain supporters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.
Example of becoming emotional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
^^
Example #1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.
You sound scared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
Hilarious. Trump is afraid and needs the “safe space” afforded by Fox and a MAGA audience. What a wimp!
How quickly we forget the safe space needed for Biden. How did that work out for you guys?
So… you think that’s a good idea for Trump?? 🧐
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.
The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.
Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.
All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!
Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.