me thinks someone is upset. Your kid get past over?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if you say so. Ive scene the roster of listed kids.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:its several. There are 2 guests from the 2013 ecnl team. And a few from the copas team. The others are not loudoun girls.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
I don't know about several, but the two 2013's that i know on that team have been there since U9 7v7
That's just inaccurate... There's no one who played for his SuperCopa team that plays/played for the 2012 team this year in any capacity that wasn't already a Loudoun player.
Oh you've "scene" the roster is that right 🤣😂
Anonymous wrote:if you say so. Ive scene the roster of listed kids.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:its several. There are 2 guests from the 2013 ecnl team. And a few from the copas team. The others are not loudoun girls.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
I don't know about several, but the two 2013's that i know on that team have been there since U9 7v7
That's just inaccurate... There's no one who played for his SuperCopa team that plays/played for the 2012 team this year in any capacity that wasn't already a Loudoun player.
if you say so. Ive scene the roster of listed kids.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:its several. There are 2 guests from the 2013 ecnl team. And a few from the copas team. The others are not loudoun girls.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
I don't know about several, but the two 2013's that i know on that team have been there since U9 7v7
That's just inaccurate... There's no one who played for his SuperCopa team that plays/played for the 2012 team this year in any capacity that wasn't already a Loudoun player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While this helps the individual player, doesn’t it impact the quality of the team? These players are doing fine playing up 1-2 years but would dominate if they played their year or even one year up. This would increase the profile of the club and bring in better players that ultimately lifts everyone up.Anonymous wrote:how about MHs 2014 daughter playing with 2012s.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think NVA is struggling? Their 2012 team has a 2013 and 2014 on it that I know of. Do you think there is too much nepotism and if they played kids at age level they would be stronger or something else?
+1 nepotism is very strong in LS to NVA, so many girls are playing up 1-2 years , this is ridiculous.
Nepotism Virginia Alliance
lol
The nepotism is insane on the girls side
You mean like once 1 girl is good, her sister(s) get the nod?
Or, nepotism like her parent coaches?
Loudoun’s parents are so proud of playing up kids,
they will bragging “ my kids is playing up with 1-2 years older and she is great!”
Of course, because your kid is a ball hog who keeps shooting every time her foot touches a ball without passing it to any teammate!
Bravo! Your kid makes a goal!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While this helps the individual player, doesn’t it impact the quality of the team? These players are doing fine playing up 1-2 years but would dominate if they played their year or even one year up. This would increase the profile of the club and bring in better players that ultimately lifts everyone up.Anonymous wrote:how about MHs 2014 daughter playing with 2012s.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think NVA is struggling? Their 2012 team has a 2013 and 2014 on it that I know of. Do you think there is too much nepotism and if they played kids at age level they would be stronger or something else?
+1 nepotism is very strong in LS to NVA, so many girls are playing up 1-2 years , this is ridiculous.
Nepotism Virginia Alliance
lol
The nepotism is insane on the girls side
You mean like once 1 girl is good, her sister(s) get the nod?
Or, nepotism like her parent coaches?
Loudoun’s parents are so proud of playing up kids,
they will bragging “ my kids is playing up with 1-2 years older and she is great!”
Of course, because your kid is a ball hog who keeps shooting every time her foot touches a ball without passing it to any teammate!
Bravo! Your kid makes a goal!
Anonymous wrote:While this helps the individual player, doesn’t it impact the quality of the team? These players are doing fine playing up 1-2 years but would dominate if they played their year or even one year up. This would increase the profile of the club and bring in better players that ultimately lifts everyone up.Anonymous wrote:how about MHs 2014 daughter playing with 2012s.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think NVA is struggling? Their 2012 team has a 2013 and 2014 on it that I know of. Do you think there is too much nepotism and if they played kids at age level they would be stronger or something else?
+1 nepotism is very strong in LS to NVA, so many girls are playing up 1-2 years , this is ridiculous.
Nepotism Virginia Alliance
lol
The nepotism is insane on the girls side
You mean like once 1 girl is good, her sister(s) get the nod?
Or, nepotism like her parent coaches?
Anonymous wrote:its several. There are 2 guests from the 2013 ecnl team. And a few from the copas team. The others are not loudoun girls.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
I don't know about several, but the two 2013's that i know on that team have been there since U9 7v7
its several. There are 2 guests from the 2013 ecnl team. And a few from the copas team. The others are not loudoun girls.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
I don't know about several, but the two 2013's that i know on that team have been there since U9 7v7
Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
Anonymous wrote:so 2012 NVA team as several 2013s on that team hand selected. Several of those girls were on MHs copas team which won last year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…
Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?
All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.
While this helps the individual player, doesn’t it impact the quality of the team? These players are doing fine playing up 1-2 years but would dominate if they played their year or even one year up. This would increase the profile of the club and bring in better players that ultimately lifts everyone up.Anonymous wrote:how about MHs 2014 daughter playing with 2012s.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think NVA is struggling? Their 2012 team has a 2013 and 2014 on it that I know of. Do you think there is too much nepotism and if they played kids at age level they would be stronger or something else?
+1 nepotism is very strong in LS to NVA, so many girls are playing up 1-2 years , this is ridiculous.
Nepotism Virginia Alliance
lol
The nepotism is insane on the girls side
You mean like once 1 girl is good, her sister(s) get the nod?
Or, nepotism like her parent coaches?
how about MHs 2014 daughter playing with 2012s.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you think NVA is struggling? Their 2012 team has a 2013 and 2014 on it that I know of. Do you think there is too much nepotism and if they played kids at age level they would be stronger or something else?
+1 nepotism is very strong in LS to NVA, so many girls are playing up 1-2 years , this is ridiculous.
Nepotism Virginia Alliance
lol
The nepotism is insane on the girls side
You mean like once 1 girl is good, her sister(s) get the nod?
Or, nepotism like her parent coaches?