Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would feel better about it if I knew how much the Instagram brought in. If it was a lot, well, then at least you’re sacrificing your privacy for good money. You still shouldn’t use your children though.

It brought in nothing. She acted like it was her job but it only served as a vehicle to flaunt her lifestyle.

This is so weird to me. What is the point? They want to be Goop-adjacent? At least Gwenyth makes bank.

I guess if you already have money (which, they didn’t, but they had the lifestyle of a person who has money!), the next thing you want is fame and adoration.

I agree with others, in the next 5 years she’ll end up the 2nd/3rd wife of a 60+ guy, maybe one who is actually rich.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would feel better about it if I knew how much the Instagram brought in. If it was a lot, well, then at least you’re sacrificing your privacy for good money. You still shouldn’t use your children though.

It brought in nothing. She acted like it was her job but it only served as a vehicle to flaunt her lifestyle.

This is so weird to me. What is the point? They want to be Goop-adjacent? At least Gwenyth makes bank.

Anonymous wrote:I’m just getting caught up on all this after seeing the NYT article. Do most people think she was aware of their financial realities? I don’t understand how you could be that in the dark about your situation if your credit cards are literally being declined. Was the husband telling her everything was just peachy and she believed him without investigating on her own? What a sad and bizarre situation.

To me, it seems as though she believed she had married into money---lots of money.Based on what? i don't know. Their social circles? the appearance of success? I mean, house in the hamptons=money, right? NY real estate? All of this, to me, proved she's an effortlessly dumb woman who lacked the minimal intelligence to add two and two together. On the other hand, the dynamics of this marriage could be politely described as weird, as it appears the couple seemingly never discussed finances.One side assumed (wrongly) and lived as though they had $600M in the bank and the other side seemed to be dead set on maintaining the lifestyle of someone who has $600M in the bank.It should be noted that, even with $600M in the bank, this kind of profligate spending without a constant influx of sky-high would've inevitably led to financial disaster. At some point she ought to have known things weren't so rosy anymore for several reasons:
-The downsizing to a $47,000/month rental which in itself is so impossibly ridiculous
-The rental of high-end furniture
-The repossessed boat
However, as i noted above the dynamic of this marriage in regards to their finances was strange, he may have well told her all is well and peachy in their 'kingdom' and, ever the hyper materialistic wife, it was all music to her ears. Even before the outbreak of covid-19, one would've been hard pressed to find one or two successful projects that you could put under this guy's belt. His dad passed away in 2016 and, immediately thereafter, problems started.Covid-19 just put an end to the charade. He was never a successful, he just ran a ponzi scheme of sorts.

Anonymous wrote:I’m just getting caught up on all this after seeing the NYT article. Do most people think she was aware of their financial realities? I don’t understand how you could be that in the dark about your situation if your credit cards are literally being declined. Was the husband telling her everything was just peachy and she believed him without investigating on her own? What a sad and bizarre situation.

Read the prior 25 pages.

I’m just getting caught up on all this after seeing the NYT article. Do most people think she was aware of their financial realities? I don’t understand how you could be that in the dark about your situation if your credit cards are literally being declined. Was the husband telling her everything was just peachy and she believed him without investigating on her own? What a sad and bizarre situation.

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, my family lives in manhattan with children that are all in private school and a very comfortable income. I never understood how women like Arielle Charnas, Candice Miller or that coco and cashmere blogger could feel comfortable spending that much money every season on clothing. I also work in PR so I know brands like The Row and Chanel which are their preferred brands to wear do not gift product. Those brands may host dinners but no way they are gifting these women clothing seasonally.

If your life revolves around feeling superior to others, then anything done in furtherance of that pursuit makes sense to you, at least.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly can’t believe this story. I knew who she was years before this because of her family connection to Arielle Charnas but I never followed her because her life seemed too good to be true. Truly perfect in a way that is not relatable at all. She herself is gorgeous and so skinny. 2 cute kids, a super rich and successful husband who lives to spoil her endlessly. They lived more like billionaires than any other influencers on Arielle’s level. I assumed it was all family and real estate money. I believed the fantasy 100%.

I feel so sad for her.

Gorgeous , my ass.

+1. She's not attractive at all. She dresses up to mask her plainness, but she's a 4 or a 5 at best. Very basic Long Island JAP looks.

Money doesn't buy good looks.Even with the accoutrements, she's barely a 4 by NYC standards. To think this is the woman a man didn't have the courage to talk about the true state of the family's finances is mind-boggling.

You are a misogynistic ass.

The truth hurts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As others have predicted, she will remarry into money. This is the crowd she's been running in for years. She'll be fine.

They scammed these people though...

If she was part of the scam, then she is able to make people believe her stories. She is young and pretty enough with a tragic angle to play up to turn the head of some super rich man regardless. Remarried inside of three years is my prediction.

She is not young. She is 42. She will be dating 60 year olds.

Frankly, my family lives in manhattan with children that are all in private school and a very comfortable income. I never understood how women like Arielle Charnas, Candice Miller or that coco and cashmere blogger could feel comfortable spending that much money every season on clothing. I also work in PR so I know brands like The Row and Chanel which are their preferred brands to wear do not gift product. Those brands may host dinners but no way they are gifting these women clothing seasonally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As others have predicted, she will remarry into money. This is the crowd she's been running in for years. She'll be fine.

They scammed these people though...

If she was part of the scam, then she is able to make people believe her stories. She is young and pretty enough with a tragic angle to play up to turn the head of some super rich man regardless. Remarried inside of three years is my prediction.

This is the only DCUM thread where 42 is young.

I say that because she's going to end up with an older man.

Anonymous wrote:House is very meh.

If that's meh, you must live in a crazy palace! The house is gorgeous.

House is very meh.

Anonymous wrote:I would feel better about it if I knew how much the Instagram brought in. If it was a lot, well, then at least you’re sacrificing your privacy for good money. You still shouldn’t use your children though.

It brought in nothing. She acted like it was her job but it only served as a vehicle to flaunt her lifestyle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As others have predicted, she will remarry into money. This is the crowd she's been running in for years. She'll be fine.

They scammed these people though...

If she was part of the scam, then she is able to make people believe her stories. She is young and pretty enough with a tragic angle to play up to turn the head of some super rich man regardless. Remarried inside of three years is my prediction.

This is the only DCUM thread where 42 is young.

Anonymous wrote:I would feel better about it if I knew how much the Instagram brought in. If it was a lot, well, then at least you’re sacrificing your privacy for good money. You still shouldn’t use your children though.

She did not monetize. But honestly I find monetizing to make more sense than not. At least there is some sort of a financial goal. It's more messed up to brag for the sake of bragging.