Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Shooting to wake up the neighborhood? That’s a bird call to police. That’s what dumb gangbangers do: shoot.

Cartels do stab . It may even have been mistaken identity and they thought Nicole was Faye.

You don’t think cartels know what a silencer is?

+1 The lack of logic among the OJ defender(s) is mind-boggling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Shooting to wake up the neighborhood? That’s a bird call to police. That’s what dumb gangbangers do: shoot.

Cartels do stab . It may even have been mistaken identity and they thought Nicole was Faye.

You don’t think cartels know what a silencer is?

Anonymous wrote:You won’t understand why running from police is done but it’s not always due to guilt. It’s moreso panic. OJ knew a modern day lynching was gonna happen and it did happen with the media and the cops

You don’t make sense. The cops adored Oj. Nobody wanted to set him up

Also, someone heard Oj say, ‘I’m sorry’ while looking in the casket
Also, a witness wasn’t allowed to testify that saw Oj at the intersection, looking frantic that very night

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You won’t understand why running from police is done but it’s not always due to guilt. It’s moreso panic. OJ knew a modern day lynching was gonna happen and it did happen with the media and the cops

Were you alive at the time? OJ was so popular that even I, a person who hates football and needs to be paid to watch it, knew who he was and thought favorably of him. He was so funny in those Naked Gun movies. Lynch mob? You’ve got to be kidding, more like fan club.

And no, as a parent I cannot fathom the idea of thinking of leaving my mourning children behind to save my ass. I’d rather be lunched, tbh.

He is guilty!

Again, this makes no sense. If he was the vicious murderer of his kids mother , why would he run upstairs and console the kids? They were asleep. Was he supposed to go upstairs and take them to the window and point out and say look, your mothers dead but don’t worry I didn’t do it (as he’s bloodied).

If he wasn’t the murderer, he didn’t know his kids were alone . He thought Nicole was alive and with them so there was nothing to mourn yet as he flew to Chicago that night not knowing his kids were alone and his ex wife was dead.

You’re hopeless the car chase was four days after the murders. OJ would have known about them even if he were innocent. But instead of trying to be there for his YOUNG children, he tried to leave the country. He’s just like Scott Peterson. Literally exactly the same. Do you think Scott’s innocent, too?

Yes, I do think Scott is innocent . The Innocent Project has a whole thing on Scott Peterson and his death sentence was reversed.

I don’t think bad behavior makes one a murderer. He cheated on his 9 month pregnant wife which is awful but bad cops also had a questionably tainted scene with him as well. Unlike OJ, he has spent his life in jail and he still says he is innocent now. What would he have to lose by still professing innocence? In jail, it’s cool to claim your crimes so its actually in his best interest to claim guilt. Cops get furious when the suspect never ever confesses ala OJ or Scott Peterson or Adnan Syed but why would they keep the charade going if everyone already thinks they murdered? I don’t know if you’ve ever heard tapings of Manson or anyone else infamous but usually when they are incarcerated, they are very loose and free with admitting what they did and how. There’s nothing cool about proclaiming innocence and “you didn’t do it, you swear” in jail.

You are remarkably dumb. It’s amazing. Congratulations!

Nicole’s body wasn’t even checked for sexual assault

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

The Bruno Mali shoes were found because of investigation of the shoe print. The tread marks left in blood matched the tread marks of a particular Magli shoe. They could even identify the subcontractor who manufactured the soles, and it was a size 12, which is what he wore. There were very few in that size sold in the US. Same with the Isotoner gloves. Bloomingdale’s only had 300 extra large for sale in the US and Nicole had bought a pair for him. The identification of the Magli shoes started with the bloody shoe print.

The amount of blood on that scene would’ve been worse than open heart surgery . The entire chest and throat of both victims were cut. They were butchered to death . The car and his socks would be absolutely swimming in blood . His sock only had one drop of blood found with EDTA yet he was running in a pool of blood per shoe prints . Blood stains are stubborn , set in very fast, and don’t go away when laundered especially blood of that magnitude from two stabbings so a car getting cleaned wouldn’t get rid of that much blood. How would he get cleaned up fast enough to board a flight less than an hour after murdering 2 people and why fly anyway so your kids can wake up and discover their mom dead? If not for the dog, those poor kids or a neighbor would’ve found their bodies in the morning .

Also, shoe brands are never identifiable based on a shoeprint . That would take someone rummaging through OJ’s closet and matching each shoe to the scene . It’s leading by suspicion not by the evidence.

When the lead detective pleads the fifth about tampering with evidence in the case, the defendant can’t be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt .


Also, Fuhrman never sued the authors who wrote about him for libel or defamation of character . He can’t say that he didn’t do those things

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

The Bruno Mali shoes were found because of investigation of the shoe print. The tread marks left in blood matched the tread marks of a particular Magli shoe. They could even identify the subcontractor who manufactured the soles, and it was a size 12, which is what he wore. There were very few in that size sold in the US. Same with the Isotoner gloves. Bloomingdale’s only had 300 extra large for sale in the US and Nicole had bought a pair for him. The identification of the Magli shoes started with the bloody shoe print.

Here’s a good video about the Scott Peterson case. 7 other pregnant women went missing in the same area as Laci .

https://youtu.be/SJ3pNMY-B8A?si=-vFa6u4QwybWS0N-

Nancy Grace is one of the worst things that happened to our culture. Instead of innocent till proven guilty, we have hacks like her who do national witch hunts using the media to convict someone before they even go to trial.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You won’t understand why running from police is done but it’s not always due to guilt. It’s moreso panic. OJ knew a modern day lynching was gonna happen and it did happen with the media and the cops

Were you alive at the time? OJ was so popular that even I, a person who hates football and needs to be paid to watch it, knew who he was and thought favorably of him. He was so funny in those Naked Gun movies. Lynch mob? You’ve got to be kidding, more like fan club.

And no, as a parent I cannot fathom the idea of thinking of leaving my mourning children behind to save my ass. I’d rather be lunched, tbh.

He is guilty!

Again, this makes no sense. If he was the vicious murderer of his kids mother , why would he run upstairs and console the kids? They were asleep. Was he supposed to go upstairs and take them to the window and point out and say look, your mothers dead but don’t worry I didn’t do it (as he’s bloodied).

If he wasn’t the murderer, he didn’t know his kids were alone . He thought Nicole was alive and with them so there was nothing to mourn yet as he flew to Chicago that night not knowing his kids were alone and his ex wife was dead.

You’re hopeless the car chase was four days after the murders. OJ would have known about them even if he were innocent. But instead of trying to be there for his YOUNG children, he tried to leave the country. He’s just like Scott Peterson. Literally exactly the same. Do you think Scott’s innocent, too?

Take them and runaway and what? Have the cops shoot at him and his kids? If Oj were a normal black man, he would’ve been shot the day of the getaway drive. It’s only because he’s famous that he wasn’t. I am sure he thought he was going to get shot. It makes no sense why he would grab the kids. The kids were already with Nicole’s parents and Is imagine they wouldn’t let someone who they believed kill their daughter get close to their grandkids

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You won’t understand why running from police is done but it’s not always due to guilt. It’s moreso panic. OJ knew a modern day lynching was gonna happen and it did happen with the media and the cops

Were you alive at the time? OJ was so popular that even I, a person who hates football and needs to be paid to watch it, knew who he was and thought favorably of him. He was so funny in those Naked Gun movies. Lynch mob? You’ve got to be kidding, more like fan club.

And no, as a parent I cannot fathom the idea of thinking of leaving my mourning children behind to save my ass. I’d rather be lunched, tbh.

He is guilty!

Again, this makes no sense. If he was the vicious murderer of his kids mother , why would he run upstairs and console the kids? They were asleep. Was he supposed to go upstairs and take them to the window and point out and say look, your mothers dead but don’t worry I didn’t do it (as he’s bloodied).

If he wasn’t the murderer, he didn’t know his kids were alone . He thought Nicole was alive and with them so there was nothing to mourn yet as he flew to Chicago that night not knowing his kids were alone and his ex wife was dead.

You’re hopeless the car chase was four days after the murders. OJ would have known about them even if he were innocent. But instead of trying to be there for his YOUNG children, he tried to leave the country. He’s just like Scott Peterson. Literally exactly the same. Do you think Scott’s innocent, too?

Yes, I do think Scott is innocent . The Innocent Project has a whole thing on Scott Peterson and his death sentence was reversed.

I don’t think bad behavior makes one a murderer. He cheated on his 9 month pregnant wife which is awful but bad cops also had a questionably tainted scene with him as well. Unlike OJ, he has spent his life in jail and he still says he is innocent now. What would he have to lose by still professing innocence? In jail, it’s cool to claim your crimes so its actually in his best interest to claim guilt. Cops get furious when the suspect never ever confesses ala OJ or Scott Peterson or Adnan Syed but why would they keep the charade going if everyone already thinks they murdered? I don’t know if you’ve ever heard tapings of Manson or anyone else infamous but usually when they are incarcerated, they are very loose and free with admitting what they did and how. There’s nothing cool about proclaiming innocence and “you didn’t do it, you swear” in jail.

Anonymous wrote:Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Shooting to wake up the neighborhood? That’s a bird call to police. That’s what dumb gangbangers do: shoot.

Cartels do stab . It may even have been mistaken identity and they thought Nicole was Faye.

Drug dealers would have shot them. Easy, quick and they wouldn’t even have to break a sweat. Stabbing someone, much less 2 people, is a crime of passion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You won’t understand why running from police is done but it’s not always due to guilt. It’s moreso panic. OJ knew a modern day lynching was gonna happen and it did happen with the media and the cops

Were you alive at the time? OJ was so popular that even I, a person who hates football and needs to be paid to watch it, knew who he was and thought favorably of him. He was so funny in those Naked Gun movies. Lynch mob? You’ve got to be kidding, more like fan club.

And no, as a parent I cannot fathom the idea of thinking of leaving my mourning children behind to save my ass. I’d rather be lunched, tbh.

He is guilty!

Again, this makes no sense. If he was the vicious murderer of his kids mother , why would he run upstairs and console the kids? They were asleep. Was he supposed to go upstairs and take them to the window and point out and say look, your mothers dead but don’t worry I didn’t do it (as he’s bloodied).

If he wasn’t the murderer, he didn’t know his kids were alone . He thought Nicole was alive and with them so there was nothing to mourn yet as he flew to Chicago that night not knowing his kids were alone and his ex wife was dead.

You’re hopeless the car chase was four days after the murders. OJ would have known about them even if he were innocent. But instead of trying to be there for his YOUNG children, he tried to leave the country. He’s just like Scott Peterson. Literally exactly the same. Do you think Scott’s innocent, too?