Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Not being snarky, but just wondering - how do you know your kids will have lots of kids? Probably will depend on their partners, financial circumstances, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Not being snarky, but just wondering - how do you know your kids will have lots of kids? Probably will depend on their partners, financial circumstances, etc.
They could also be infertile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Not being snarky, but just wondering - how do you know your kids will have lots of kids? Probably will depend on their partners, financial circumstances, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
By DCUM standards, I'm far to the right. I have a bunch of kids. In fact, my few fellow conservatives have more kids than our many progressive friends put together.
I can't speak for my friends, but my kids will all have lots of kids. To the extent politics are heritable, and research suggests they are, the future will belong to people like me. We are in peak leftism right now the same way Japan peaked in 1990.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Declines in birthrates will save the world. More animals, more trees.
Get yourself fixed. Especially your ego.
Anonymous wrote:Now they really probably won't change their minds about having kids OP. Climate change is going to suck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is most people have more than one child. They cannot afford more than one in the long term but just want to reproduce themselves.
8 billion people. The world does not need more of you.
At what point will this argument be moot? In a generation or two the data could become dire if people really keep pushing this idea. Declines in birth rates can have drastic nominal population affects over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is interesting though, seeing those countries seems they are not dealing with some of those same feelings as OP, and haven't seen anything if they have the same amount of mental health issues and disjointed social structure the West seems to have now. Not having children by choice appears to be more of a Western phenomenon sometimes wonder if that has been more negative than positive.
The happiest women I know are not in therapy, have multiple children, and a solid husband. The recipe may be boring, but it's the most effective way to a good life. These happy women never feel the need to tell you they're happy with their choices, unlike some women who declined to have a husband and family.
Good for them, not for everybody. Everyone is an individual, I don't understand people who argue for cookie-cutter solutions to people's lives.
For people who follow a different path, great! However, most people want the same things, which means a cookie-cutter approach is the most likely to work. Most folks are not unique.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is interesting though, seeing those countries seems they are not dealing with some of those same feelings as OP, and haven't seen anything if they have the same amount of mental health issues and disjointed social structure the West seems to have now. Not having children by choice appears to be more of a Western phenomenon sometimes wonder if that has been more negative than positive.
The happiest women I know are not in therapy, have multiple children, and a solid husband. The recipe may be boring, but it's the most effective way to a good life. These happy women never feel the need to tell you they're happy with their choices, unlike some women who declined to have a husband and family.
Good for them, not for everybody. Everyone is an individual, I don't understand people who argue for cookie-cutter solutions to people's lives.