Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://theaugurbit.com/2024/03/10/seminar-limits-our-ability-to-speak-freely/
Just wow on so many levels. But does it change anything?
Great op-ed. There has been something like this written by a student every 3-4 mos in the school paper. My kid says that 75% of the kids agree with this sentiment. Maybe 90%. It's a few very loud hold out kids who are in favor of the status quo.
Russell keeps writing essays and giving talks about encouraging thought and idea diversity and yet, the admins and some select faculty and maybe 10-25% of the kids think they are running / at a social justice advocacy org instead of a f*'ing school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://theaugurbit.com/2024/03/10/seminar-limits-our-ability-to-speak-freely/
Just wow on so many levels. But does it change anything?
Great op-ed. There has been something like this written by a student every 3-4 mos in the school paper. My kid says that 75% of the kids agree with this sentiment. Maybe 90%. It's a few very loud hold out kids who are in favor of the status quo.
Russell keeps writing essays and giving talks about encouraging thought and idea diversity and yet, the admins and some select faculty and maybe 10-25% of the kids think they are running / at a social justice advocacy org instead of a f*'ing school
Anonymous wrote:https://theaugurbit.com/2024/03/10/seminar-limits-our-ability-to-speak-freely/
Just wow on so many levels. But does it change anything?
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never met a nice kid at GDS. ever.
Anonymous wrote:Another GDS student op-ed about inability for students to voice dissenting opinions in HS classes - just as we experienced with our kids who have gone through the HS (and one there now).
https://theaugurbit.com/2024/03/10/seminar-limits-our-ability-to-speak-freely/
kudos to this student for writing what many (certainly all three of our kids) feel.
A great school academically for the most part - but tramples on the right to express any dissenting opinions.
"For instance, during a class focusing on transgender issues, many students were reluctant to participate because they were afraid of getting judged by the teacher or offending other classmates. My classmates have told me that they are scared to voice their true opinions because they don’t want their teacher to send them to the Disciplinary Consultation Committee or send an email home. Because many people do not want to voice their true opinions, there is a lack of meaningful dialogue. "
and
"In one of my classes, my teacher lectured to convey the racial power dynamic in America. The lecture was focused on his opinions about why Black people cannot be racist towards white people. Seminar is supposed to be a safe space, but starting with these opinionated lectures makes students afraid to voice their opinions because they are scared of getting in trouble if they have beliefs that differ from the teacher’s views. "
and
"Students must feel safe to share their opinions ... even if they go against the left-leaning, progressive views of most people at GDS."
Anonymous wrote:Has no one suggested restorative justice to GDS? I’m not a huge fan of RJ but it works well for minor to moderate infractions where the aggrieved person can have a restorative conversation with the perceived aggressor.
Hold a confidential healing circle where people can talk out their feelings. I think it would work better than these secret tribunals.
And it is all the rage these days so the DEI office will most likely embrace it
Anonymous wrote:What a strange thing to say. DC has done sports and camps with a dozen different GDS kids and they have all been really nice.
I can't say the same for other privates around here.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never met a nice kid at GDS. ever.
Anonymous wrote:I am the parent of a junior at GDS, and just can’t across this thread with 26 pages. Would anyone care to summarize the issue, presenting both sides fairly? It would help me for sure but perhaps would help the many participants so far.