Anonymous
09/05/2023 14:16
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People thought we’d never have an AA president, and yet we did. No one thought abortion would be legal, and yet it was. No one thought RvW would be overturned, yet it was.
Non of those things have anything to do with third party candidates winning presidential elections. Please explain exactly what states are going to provide the 270 electoral votes for this superstar?
Just sayin’ that one should never say never.
You can shovel whatever pile of bull crap you want to shovel but the the voters don't like being treated like fools. Voters in the special election in August in Ohio reported that in addition to wanting to protect reproductive freedoms, they resented being fed a pile of crap from the GOP that the election was really about other issues. So they voted the GOP down by a significant margin.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 14:04
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People thought we’d never have an AA president, and yet we did. No one thought abortion would be legal, and yet it was. No one thought RvW would be overturned, yet it was.
Non of those things have anything to do with third party candidates winning presidential elections. Please explain exactly what states are going to provide the 270 electoral votes for this superstar?
Just sayin’ that one should never say never.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 12:53
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:People thought we’d never have an AA president, and yet we did. No one thought abortion would be legal, and yet it was. No one thought RvW would be overturned, yet it was.
Non of those things have anything to do with third party candidates winning presidential elections. Please explain exactly what states are going to provide the 270 electoral votes for this superstar?
Anonymous
09/05/2023 12:46
Subject: "No Labels" Party
People thought we’d never have an AA president, and yet we did. No one thought abortion would be legal, and yet it was. No one thought RvW would be overturned, yet it was.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 12:32
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:70% of Americans do not want either Biden or Trump. That means roughly 15% of the county support Biden and 15% support Trump as it is today. We need a third party if not now then when?
The process to choose a better candidates is to vote in the primaries. Primary participation is dismal. Get primary participation to 70 percent and then you can whine and complain.
The reality is that third parities do not win elections ever. You don't like it but it is a fact. Take all that money and energy and use it to get voters to participate in the primary where they can replace Trump and Biden with better candidates if they vote to do so.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 12:13
Subject: "No Labels" Party
70% of Americans do not want either Biden or Trump. That means roughly 15% of the county support Biden and 15% support Trump as it is today. We need a third party if not now then when?
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:42
Subject: Re:"No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:What will RFK Jr do?? Will he endorse Biden after he loses the Democratic nomination? Run on a 3rd party ticket? Endorse Trump?
There is a thread about RFK Jr. Discuss it there.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:38
Subject: Re:"No Labels" Party
What will RFK Jr do?? Will he endorse Biden after he loses the Democratic nomination? Run on a 3rd party ticket? Endorse Trump?
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:36
Subject: "No Labels" Party
This is not for moderates. Moderates are currently in charge of the federal government. Not only are wishy-washy centrists not marginalized, they are the people with all the clout to water down legislation and regulations and policies to protect their patrons and benefactors. Moderates would lose their influence if Republicans win.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:33
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
Are you sure? Maybe it is voting Biden.
Oh definitely. The billionaire.rught wingers behind it absolutely want to see Biden reelected. Again don't be stupid.
Trump does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being reelected without some hail Mary like no labels trying to peel off some Biden voters in the swing states.
Vote for whoever you want. That is your right. But don't misunderstand why no labels is trying to get your vote. And it is not so they can win. It is to support trump and deny Biden because they cannot just win an election by actually attracting voters to the Republicans.
So sure. And yet, you're wrong. I could try to explain but you wouldn't listen. You already think you know everything.
Weak. I won't explain because posters will disagree with the explanation. Sure.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:26
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
Are you sure? Maybe it is voting Biden.
Oh definitely. The billionaire.rught wingers behind it absolutely want to see Biden reelected. Again don't be stupid.
Trump does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being reelected without some hail Mary like no labels trying to peel off some Biden voters in the swing states.
Vote for whoever you want. That is your right. But don't misunderstand why no labels is trying to get your vote. And it is not so they can win. It is to support trump and deny Biden because they cannot just win an election by actually attracting voters to the Republicans.
So sure. And yet, you're wrong. I could try to explain but you wouldn't listen. You already think you know everything.
I don't know anything. But I have a brain. If these right wingers were pro Biden they would support Biden with all that cash and that is not what they are doing.
+1
I think there are a lot of “I’m just a non partisan innocent asking questions!” Republicans on here and I have to tell you: we see you. We know what you’re up to. Remember how you were certain that RFK, Jr would be some amazing Democratic candidate because you all threw some dark money at him and orchestrated a little roll out? No one wants him.
Only Republicans and stupid people like third party candidates. You know which one you are if you’re openly supporting this.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:23
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
Are you sure? Maybe it is voting Biden.
Oh definitely. The billionaire.rught wingers behind it absolutely want to see Biden reelected. Again don't be stupid.
Trump does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being reelected without some hail Mary like no labels trying to peel off some Biden voters in the swing states.
Vote for whoever you want. That is your right. But don't misunderstand why no labels is trying to get your vote. And it is not so they can win. It is to support trump and deny Biden because they cannot just win an election by actually attracting voters to the Republicans.
So sure. And yet, you're wrong. I could try to explain but you wouldn't listen. You already think you know everything.
I don't know anything. But I have a brain. If these right wingers were pro Biden they would support Biden with all that cash and that is not what they are doing.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:19
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
Are you sure? Maybe it is voting Biden.
Oh definitely. The billionaire.rught wingers behind it absolutely want to see Biden reelected. Again don't be stupid.
Trump does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being reelected without some hail Mary like no labels trying to peel off some Biden voters in the swing states.
Vote for whoever you want. That is your right. But don't misunderstand why no labels is trying to get your vote. And it is not so they can win. It is to support trump and deny Biden because they cannot just win an election by actually attracting voters to the Republicans.
So sure. And yet, you're wrong. I could try to explain but you wouldn't listen. You already think you know everything.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:12
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
Are you sure? Maybe it is voting Biden.
Oh definitely. The billionaire.rught wingers behind it absolutely want to see Biden reelected. Again don't be stupid.
Trump does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being reelected without some hail Mary like no labels trying to peel off some Biden voters in the swing states.
Vote for whoever you want. That is your right. But don't misunderstand why no labels is trying to get your vote. And it is not so they can win. It is to support trump and deny Biden because they cannot just win an election by actually attracting voters to the Republicans.
Anonymous
09/05/2023 11:09
Subject: "No Labels" Party
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could win on the No Labels line? It seems like they have an excellent chance if the opponents are Biden and Trump.
That's what the naysayers that claim a 3rd party has no chance fail to understand. We are in unprecedented times. In none of our lifetimes have we ever had a situation where two presidents, an incumbent and an ex-president with historically low approval ratings, are likely to be nominated by their parties for a rematch of the most recent election. It's a mind-boggling predicament. How can we not strive to come up with something better considering how unpopular these two are?
Wrong no labels. Third parties never win. The goal of this party is not to win. The proper label is "no Chance".
Yea, we should all just vote for Trump or Biden until the cows come home...lol
Voting no labels is voting trump. Don't be stupid.
+1
Which is, after all, what all these third party lumpers want. There’s a reason these attempts are always funded by the GOP.