Anonymous
03/29/2023 16:13
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
No, you’re right, I’ve only seen it in snippets on the major new network. It’s ducking obvious. Like I don’t need a PhD in conspiracy theory to draw my own conclusions on 9/11. The jury could have gone either way. The truth is one. Forever. No matter what you think. Is it dark and ozone laden up
There?
There?
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:58
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Have you interrogated the need to be up her ozone backside? The trial is not in her favor, the jury is enjoying it but they’re in Utah. These people are moral, ski etc
You seem awfully frantic about how this is going. Maybe not going the way you think it should be.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:56
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
He’s brain damaged, he feels wronged, he wants an apology before it’s all over. I get it.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:52
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Why aren’t they all testifying? You guys, this is nuts. There are no obstacles on Bandana. You can see everything. I’ve seen and remember any crashes and even skier positions just from random runs each year, they are rare and you clock and crash or wipe out. It’s also very hard to disengage faster than someone can clock it. So why isn’t GP having eyewitnesses galore? Because it didn’t happen the way she said
Of course it did not happen the way she has explained it, I agree about the witnesses, although it is seven years later, so there's that .... with that being said, he is a nut job trying to capitalize on a celebrity. We should call both of them on their bs.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:50
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Have you interrogated the need to be up her ozone backside? The trial is not in her favor, the jury is enjoying it but they’re in Utah. These people are moral, ski etc
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:38
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Mkay. Do tell who is who Nancy Grace
Mkay. Watch the case, it's not that hard.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:35
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Mkay. Do tell who is who Nancy Grace
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:35
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
She's obviously lying. She never was a good actress (thanks Harvey!). She appears to be a snotty Hollywood elite who thinks she can get over on a jury of rubes.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:14
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:You’re so weird. OMG. Enjoy the echo chamber. 3 separate ski/dr people told you the same thing. GP sadly is lying
Cool. You aren't watching the trial, don't know who's who, and are pretending to be some kind of expert Dr. We'll see what the jury decides based on what's actually being presented not just their feelings and opinions. Hopefully they are fair and unbiased.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 15:11
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
You’re so weird. OMG. Enjoy the echo chamber. 3 separate ski/dr people told you the same thing. GP sadly is lying
Anonymous
03/29/2023 14:55
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then there’s a 3rd guide.
List the six and where they were.
Was Oakes up hill?
You made the claim there are 6. You cite your source. You're following this so closely so it should be easy for you.
It’s easy to draw the right conclusions intelligently. You don’t like them and are asking the question. So answer it.
My point isn’t where are they? My point is she paid 10s of thousands for the animation but didn’t bother lining up
all the 11 witnesses. Why? Perjury, is why.
There weren't 6, at most there were 4 for all the kids. You aren't paying attention to this trial and don't have the details straight. Show us something that proves there were 11 people there and both the plaintiff and defendant attorneys are ignoring them. You don't even know Apple's instructors name or where she was on the hill and we're supposed to take you seriously?
Anonymous
03/29/2023 14:52
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anyway TikTok and the entire generation think she did it.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 14:51
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Then there’s a 3rd guide.
List the six and where they were.
Was Oakes up hill?
You made the claim there are 6. You cite your source. You're following this so closely so it should be easy for you.
It’s easy to draw the right conclusions intelligently. You don’t like them and are asking the question. So answer it.
My point isn’t where are they? My point is she paid 10s of thousands for the animation but didn’t bother lining up
all the 11 witnesses. Why? Perjury, is why.
Anonymous
03/29/2023 14:49
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Why aren’t they all testifying? You guys, this is nuts. There are no obstacles on Bandana. You can see everything. I’ve seen and remember any crashes and even skier positions just from random runs each year, they are rare and you clock and crash or wipe out. It’s also very hard to disengage faster than someone can clock it. So why isn’t GP having eyewitnesses galore? Because it didn’t happen the way she said
Anonymous
03/29/2023 14:47
Subject: Gwyneth Paltrow court case
Anonymous wrote:Then there’s a 3rd guide.
List the six and where they were.
Was Oakes up hill?
You made the claim there are 6. You cite your source. You're following this so closely so it should be easy for you.