Where is anyone’s common sense with a kid tattooed face/neck, suicidal, failing school, online violence addictions, wants to knife kill his family……

And NO ONE stops and disciplines him or demands a healthy life or takes him away to a camp or coop program.

Instead, everyone’s too politically correct to say or do anything for weirdos. Don’t want to offend a non-weirdo all tattooed and pierced and not working and dressing in black and raging against some machine.

Not parents, not schools, not police, not neighbors, the gun shop. Nope. Spoiled, neglected kid - who prob never did an organized sport or volunteer work or taken to a game or vacation - scared everyone into submission. That plus the PC world we live in where we let anyone do whatever they want. No community. No discipline. No values. No work ethic. No questions.

Look at the guy. What person with common sense would sell a bunch of guns to that guy????

No one would. So they follow the law. In case the gun buyers really just a friendly tattooed up, grunge computer programmer making $250k a year in his basement, dressed like a freak. Right. That must be it. Society has no guidance anymore, anything goes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone SEE the shooter? Look at his picture? THERE is your problem right there. He also advertised what he was planning on social media and not one person raised a red flag. He was even known to law enforcement. Nada.

There are an untold number of people in America who suffer from a form of mental illness. The overwhelming majority don’t commit mass murder. Some might get facial tattoos. Many are known to law enforcement from prior contacts. Some spend their waking hours posting crazy sh+t on the internet. (QAnon snyine?) some might even be what you consider to be unattractive. Nobody is monitoring every internet posting. And as far as we know he never explicitly threatened anyone. What’s your point?

He violated no law and none of the red flags in IL law. Law enforcement cannot monitor round the clock the 10s of millions of Americans with mental health issues. Ban the riffles.

Totally disagree. Our country has tipped way over trying to protect the rights of criminals and the mentally ill. They need to be insttutionalized, in group home supervision, and/or under forced medications.

People with mental illness aren’t to be equated with criminals. They have constitutional, civil and human rights. What the hell is wrong with you? Do you know anything about congregate residential facilities for people with mental illness? Do you want one operating next door to your home? I didn’t think so. And most states closed their institutional facilities for people with mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities many years ago. Maybe you are the one who needs to be under forced medication.

1/3 of the country is diagnosed with a mental health illness every year. Probably higher since many go undiagnosed. We cant’t lock up or monitor 1/3 of the country.

We can lock up the more severe cases.

No, we really can’t. No one will take them and it’s virtually impossible to commit someone.

Plus it’s VERY difficult to treat someone or help someone who doesn’t want help, or is in denial if their chronic symptoms or formal diagnoses.
Many forms of cBT therapies - like dBt- must have 2+ sessions a week and one must graduate to the next module. Can take 12-24 months or you wash out for lack of effort.
Same for medications and lack of compliance. Do you think it’s fun for a sibling, spouse or elderly parent to get a mentally disordered adult to take their daily meds?
And then there’s the lies to get you away. Yes I did it, yes I took it, yes go away…

On top of that the vast, vast majority of people with mental illness are not going to shoot up a school or a parade, and it is an egregiously cruel proposal to lock them all away because this handful of murderers have committed such heinous crimes. Mentally ill people are more likely to be victims of crime than to commit a crime, and we shouldn't stigmatize and victimize them further by tossing around the idea that they all be locked up. It is an astonishingly cruel suggestion. And who knows if it's even effective - since most of the people shooting up crowds of their neighbors and children probably wouldn't be captured under that system anyway.

I'm going to make a radical proposal: The guns are the problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IT’S THE GUNS.

There are millions of things that could have contributed to this creep’s problems but only one cause: HE HAD EASY ACCESS TO MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPONS AND EXTENDED MAGAZINES.

+1 billion

+1 a billion more

Surprised none of the repugnant gun nuts are on here proposing we just do away with parades and other public events, but keep the guns.

Looks like the suicidal/homicidal mentally ill killer’s Trumper dad bought him the guns after the police took his knives away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty pro-constitution, but if we can't buy alcohol or cigarettes until age 21, why not add all guns too. I don't think it will stop all shootings, but it's something.

Then, we should look at why our society is growing looney tunes. Just look at him. WTF. What is happening to children? We cannot pretend a shift isn't occurring. A disintegration of humankind.

If you’re pro-constitutional you know the 2nd amendment never said you had the right to own guns. It said arms. And I can give you a long list of the arms we have already banned from nuclear to biological to firearms to explosives to lawn darts! And the ban was upheld before for assault rifles. It would be totally constitutional to ban these weapons and make them illegal to own along with extended magazines.

Further, no right is unfettered. It would totally be within the constitution to demand licensing and registering of any personal firearm.

People cannot "keep and bear" a nuke. It's not small or long arms people can keep and bear. In their arm per se. And it certainly didn't exist when the 2nd amendment was written. Rifles or muskets did. This was probably addressed by SCOTUS in the NY case a week ago.

Suitcase nuclear device.

Who is selling one?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone SEE the shooter? Look at his picture? THERE is your problem right there. He also advertised what he was planning on social media and not one person raised a red flag. He was even known to law enforcement. Nada.

There are an untold number of people in America who suffer from a form of mental illness. The overwhelming majority don’t commit mass murder. Some might get facial tattoos. Many are known to law enforcement from prior contacts. Some spend their waking hours posting crazy sh+t on the internet. (QAnon snyine?) some might even be what you consider to be unattractive. Nobody is monitoring every internet posting. And as far as we know he never explicitly threatened anyone. What’s your point?

He violated no law and none of the red flags in IL law. Law enforcement cannot monitor round the clock the 10s of millions of Americans with mental health issues. Ban the riffles.

Totally disagree. Our country has tipped way over trying to protect the rights of criminals and the mentally ill. They need to be insttutionalized, in group home supervision, and/or under forced medications.

People with mental illness aren’t to be equated with criminals. They have constitutional, civil and human rights. What the hell is wrong with you? Do you know anything about congregate residential facilities for people with mental illness? Do you want one operating next door to your home? I didn’t think so. And most states closed their institutional facilities for people with mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities many years ago. Maybe you are the one who needs to be under forced medication.

1/3 of the country is diagnosed with a mental health illness every year. Probably higher since many go undiagnosed. We cant’t lock up or monitor 1/3 of the country.

We can lock up the more severe cases.

No, we really can’t. No one will take them and it’s virtually impossible to commit someone.

Plus it’s VERY difficult to treat someone or help someone who doesn’t want help, or is in denial if their chronic symptoms or formal diagnoses.
Many forms of cBT therapies - like dBt- must have 2+ sessions a week and one must graduate to the next module. Can take 12-24 months or you wash out for lack of effort.
Same for medications and lack of compliance. Do you think it’s fun for a sibling, spouse or elderly parent to get a mentally disordered adult to take their daily meds?
And then there’s the lies to get you away. Yes I did it, yes I took it, yes go away…

The African Americans murdered in their neighborhood supermarket also felt targeted

As did the Ulvade families who no doubt feel that the police didn't want to risk their lives to save their babies

The point is that the violence these weapons yield is tearing at the social fabric of this country

Ban the Assault weapons- they are a threat to the Public

Then, do something about what is on the dark web and the high levels of parental neglect in this country

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/illinois-shooting-july-fourth-parade-07-04-22/2022

I grew up around highland park. It's white, safe and lots of money there. I cannot believe this. Shootings really can happen anywhere, so scary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty pro-constitution, but if we can't buy alcohol or cigarettes until age 21, why not add all guns too. I don't think it will stop all shootings, but it's something.

Then, we should look at why our society is growing looney tunes. Just look at him. WTF. What is happening to children? We cannot pretend a shift isn't occurring. A disintegration of humankind.

If you’re pro-constitutional you know the 2nd amendment never said you had the right to own guns. It said arms. And I can give you a long list of the arms we have already banned from nuclear to biological to firearms to explosives to lawn darts! And the ban was upheld before for assault rifles. It would be totally constitutional to ban these weapons and make them illegal to own along with extended magazines.

Further, no right is unfettered. It would totally be within the constitution to demand licensing and registering of any personal firearm.

People cannot "keep and bear" a nuke. It's not small or long arms people can keep and bear. In their arm per se. And it certainly didn't exist when the 2nd amendment was written. Rifles or muskets did. This was probably addressed by SCOTUS in the NY case a week ago.

Suitcase nuclear device.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty pro-constitution, but if we can't buy alcohol or cigarettes until age 21, why not add all guns too. I don't think it will stop all shootings, but it's something.

Then, we should look at why our society is growing looney tunes. Just look at him. WTF. What is happening to children? We cannot pretend a shift isn't occurring. A disintegration of humankind.

If you’re pro-constitutional you know the 2nd amendment never said you had the right to own guns. It said arms. And I can give you a long list of the arms we have already banned from nuclear to biological to firearms to explosives to lawn darts! And the ban was upheld before for assault rifles. It would be totally constitutional to ban these weapons and make them illegal to own along with extended magazines.

Further, no right is unfettered. It would totally be within the constitution to demand licensing and registering of any personal firearm.

People cannot "keep and bear" a nuke. It's not small or long arms people can keep and bear. In their arm per se. And it certainly didn't exist when the 2nd amendment was written. Rifles or muskets did. This was probably addressed by SCOTUS in the NY case a week ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone SEE the shooter? Look at his picture? THERE is your problem right there. He also advertised what he was planning on social media and not one person raised a red flag. He was even known to law enforcement. Nada.

There are an untold number of people in America who suffer from a form of mental illness. The overwhelming majority don’t commit mass murder. Some might get facial tattoos. Many are known to law enforcement from prior contacts. Some spend their waking hours posting crazy sh+t on the internet. (QAnon snyine?) some might even be what you consider to be unattractive. Nobody is monitoring every internet posting. And as far as we know he never explicitly threatened anyone. What’s your point?

He violated no law and none of the red flags in IL law. Law enforcement cannot monitor round the clock the 10s of millions of Americans with mental health issues. Ban the riffles.

Totally disagree. Our country has tipped way over trying to protect the rights of criminals and the mentally ill. They need to be insttutionalized, in group home supervision, and/or under forced medications.

People with mental illness aren’t to be equated with criminals. They have constitutional, civil and human rights. What the hell is wrong with you? Do you know anything about congregate residential facilities for people with mental illness? Do you want one operating next door to your home? I didn’t think so. And most states closed their institutional facilities for people with mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities many years ago. Maybe you are the one who needs to be under forced medication.

1/3 of the country is diagnosed with a mental health illness every year. Probably higher since many go undiagnosed. We cant’t lock up or monitor 1/3 of the country.

We can lock up the more severe cases.

Other countries also have severely mental ill folks. But unlike here in the US, they don’t have easy access to guns.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Totally normal. Yep, we CANT tinker with 2A. Who cares if this toddler Found walking around with blood on his shoes is now an orphan. FREEDUM!!!
F You, anyone still supporting GOP who block gun safety measures.

I cannot stop thinking about this. Look at this poor little boy’s face. My heart can’t take it.

+1 ❤️😢

Anonymous wrote:Totally normal. Yep, we CANT tinker with 2A. Who cares if this toddler Found walking around with blood on his shoes is now an orphan. FREEDUM!!!
F You, anyone still supporting GOP who block gun safety measures.

I cannot stop thinking about this. Look at this poor little boy’s face. My heart can’t take it.

Anonymous wrote:IT’S THE GUNS.

There are millions of things that could have contributed to this creep’s problems but only one cause: HE HAD EASY ACCESS TO MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPONS AND EXTENDED MAGAZINES.

+1 billion

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Totally normal. Yep, we CANT tinker with 2A. Who cares if this toddler Found walking around with blood on his shoes is now an orphan. FREEDUM!!!
F You, anyone still supporting GOP who block gun safety measures.

I just read this somewhere else. Cannot stand it. Poor little sweetie. Gun nuts rot in hell.

Why does this tweet say he was found "wandering around"? And why do you say that? He was found underneath his father's body.