Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Exactly. Rights are political, not absolute. If the conservatives engineer abortion to not be a constitutional right than progressives can engineer assault weapons to not be a constitutional right. It is the same process.
The word “abortion” is no where in the constitution. Actually, there no mention of any reproductive rights at all.
Guns are called out directly. There is no way to put these two issues on any constitutional debate. Guns were literally the second thing they put in to Americans rights. Child birth or pregnancy termination are not even mentioned.
Scotus determined I had a constitutional right for 50 years and then they changed scotus and the right was no longer a constitutional right. Those are the facts regardless if you like it or not. Scotus determines what the constitution says. They did it for reproductive rights and they can do it for the what arms the 2nd amendment does and does not cover.
That’s why states have powers to make their own laws. There are quite a few bad amendments we added after the first 10. But whatever- the 10th amendment was pretty clear that anything not covered in the constitution is up to the states. I really do not care if California bans AR-15s or let’s a mother kill a newborn a week after birth. Let the states decide. California just cannot say “all guns are illegal” because the constitution says the state cannot make that law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Exactly. Rights are political, not absolute. If the conservatives engineer abortion to not be a constitutional right than progressives can engineer assault weapons to not be a constitutional right. It is the same process.
The word “abortion” is no where in the constitution. Actually, there no mention of any reproductive rights at all.
Guns are called out directly. There is no way to put these two issues on any constitutional debate. Guns were literally the second thing they put in to Americans rights. Child birth or pregnancy termination are not even mentioned.
Scotus determined I had a constitutional right for 50 years and then they changed scotus and the right was no longer a constitutional right. Those are the facts regardless if you like it or not. Scotus determines what the constitution says. They did it for reproductive rights and they can do it for the what arms the 2nd amendment does and does not cover.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Exactly. Rights are political, not absolute. If the conservatives engineer abortion to not be a constitutional right than progressives can engineer assault weapons to not be a constitutional right. It is the same process.
The word “abortion” is no where in the constitution. Actually, there no mention of any reproductive rights at all.
Guns are called out directly. There is no way to put these two issues on any constitutional debate. Guns were literally the second thing they put in to Americans rights. Child birth or pregnancy termination are not even mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Exactly. Rights are political, not absolute. If the conservatives engineer abortion to not be a constitutional right than progressives can engineer assault weapons to not be a constitutional right. It is the same process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Exactly. Rights are political, not absolute. If the conservatives engineer abortion to not be a constitutional right than progressives can engineer assault weapons to not be a constitutional right. It is the same process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
I have no desire to ban guns, I would like reasonable regulations. I would like the culture of gun worshipers to recede. There are ways to do this that are absolutely constitutional. Let me guess—you’re against these things but want the court to overturn Roe?
Anonymous wrote:I think we should ban guns for 5 years. Have the feds round up all the guns but track (register) ownership. Law-abiding Citizens will get back their guns in 5 years. Criminals and non-citizens will not get their guns back.
Then let’s see what happens over those five years. Let’s see what happens to suicide rates, drug/gang killings, and mass murders. Then based on that five year experiment, establish a constitutional law (amendment) based on the five year findings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
Jeez dude, why are you so angry?
And when we get rid of the guns, as I’m sure you’ll eventually be successful in doing, what will you blame when mass murderers switch to trucks or fire, or improvised explosives?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
How are you this stupid? I’m serious.
We have a mass murder problem here that exceeds every other developed nation. By a lot. The key ingredient is … guns!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We've got to change things folks.
I personally value kids lives and doctors lives and concert goers lives and grocery shoppers lives etc... over assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Some bat crap crazy hobbyists shouldn't be holding the rest of us hostage.
Yup. Tyranny of bat sh1t crazy.
They banned guns in Europe, didn’t stop crazies from running over 80+ people with trucks
They banned guns in China, didn’t stop crazies from stabbing and killing dozens of people at a time
Better than 45k killed by guns every year.
30k are Suicides
8k are justified homocide aka police shooting a criminal who is a threat
About 7k are unjustified homocides, 90% are inner city and gang related and done with handguns
200-300 per year are rifles, lower than pool drownings and death from dogs
Lies.
24.2k suicide
19.4k murder
1.5k unintentional, law enforcement, undetermined
Data on gun types is only available for 13.6k of the 19.4k murders:
8k handguns
400 rifle
140 shotguns
And data not available for 10.8k because police departments didn’t report data.
And super high death rate in red states:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/firearm_mortality/firearm.htm
Looking at that last link - apparently policies and laws in the different states do matter in gun violence as a whole. Imagine what we could accomplish with nationwide restrictions. Oh wait, we don’t have to imagine. We have that data too. Mass shootings went down when we banned semi-automatics in the country as a whole.
Unfortunately that is not true. Gun crime stayed the same during the 10 year ban. No report out of hundreds has any statistical evidence that an assault weapons ban had any impact on anything other than the flow of guns to Mexico for cartel wars.
Maybe the ban was too short, or not broad enough or whatever- but gun crime/violence was not impacted by a limited ban.
If you look at trends in the last 3 years, road rage shootings are up the most in California and they have the strictest gun laws going. Those highway shootings are pistols. Gun. Violence is way bigger than rifles painted black.