Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why stop at G/T? How about sports? If your son gets cut from the basketball team, demand a 2nd tryout! Heck, why don't we let everyone into the G/T program?
Reading about all these tips/tricks to get someone into the G/T program who was initially rejected - it's nauseating.
what's worse is they have to pay $450 for an IQ test. Only some affluent people can do that. Seems kinda unfair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To eliminated controversies, they should striclty go with test scores.
First round - NNAT/CogAt, Provide two different test dates to accommodate unfortunate bad day, increase cut-off score to select surely gifted.
Secon round - Boaderline kids who got rejected appeal with WISC if choose to.
test scores alone prove little. Ever work with "smart" but underachieving people? I thought they were looking for students who are motivated to excell academically.
Anonymous wrote:Why stop at G/T? How about sports? If your son gets cut from the basketball team, demand a 2nd tryout! Heck, why don't we let everyone into the G/T program?
Reading about all these tips/tricks to get someone into the G/T program who was initially rejected - it's nauseating.
Anonymous wrote:Why stop at G/T? How about sports? If your son gets cut from the basketball team, demand a 2nd tryout! Heck, why don't we let everyone into the G/T program?
Reading about all these tips/tricks to get someone into the G/T program who was initially rejected - it's nauseating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's say if you don't get a job in very first interview, what do you do? You don't try next time?
After talking to many many parents in my community/school I found out that a lot kids who get in on appeal are thriving at the center (some more so than the kids who got in the 1st go around) and about 20% of the kids who got in by the normal process were actually pulled back to our base school because they were not thriving and not keeping up so the parents pulled them out. I do not believe that it should be a one and done deal and that is why there is an appeal process.
Anonymous wrote:To eliminated controversies, they should striclty go with test scores.
First round - NNAT/CogAt, Provide two different test dates to accommodate unfortunate bad day, increase cut-off score to select surely gifted.
Secon round - Boaderline kids who got rejected appeal with WISC if choose to.
Anonymous wrote:Let's say if you don't get a job in very first interview, what do you do? You don't try next time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In order to satisfy your own ego, you are wasting the county's valuable time and resources. Your child is going to do just fine if he and she studies hard and puts forth great effort. Instead, you want to brag with ladies at your book club that your child is in G/T. What life lessons are you teaching. When he or she gets rejected from certain colleges, are you going to stomp your feet and appeal that, too?
County made appealing part of the process. If they didn't, the first round could've been very different in evaluation. You don't need to care much about other kids here. Take good care of yours.
right. I understand that half the kids in AAP got in on appeal. Having been in the classroom a couple of times, I can tell ya a whole lot of them obviously received the "benefit of the doubt." That's why we have 30-31 in the class instead of 24 or 25.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
right. I understand that half the kids in AAP got in on appeal. Having been in the classroom a couple of times, I can tell ya a whole lot of them obviously received the "benefit of the doubt." That's why we have 30-31 in the class instead of 24 or 25.
Factually incorrect. Half of the appeals are admitted. But less than 15% all applications are appealed. So less than 10% get in on appeal.