Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Looks necessary to me given the huge number of residential buildings under development...
![]()
And bonus, he found a way to do it cheaper.
+1. That site saved money!
It doesn’t save money. It’s not needed right now, and certainly not at that location.
If and when a school is needed, it will be at a different site. And if it were to cost more to build at that site, which might or might not be the case, it would only be because the other site is closer to where the residential development is actually occurring.
Frisch is such a putz.
Look at the projected numbers AND the new residential buildings under development right now (proposed, approved, and under construction).
There will continue to be TONS of growth around Tysons which already has several schools forecasted to be overcapacity. The proposed and approved #s are on top of those forecasted numbers, which only account for buildings already under construction.
You can't just look at today's numbers - this school will be built for future needs based on the construction of new residential buildings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Looks necessary to me given the huge number of residential buildings under development...
![]()
And bonus, he found a way to do it cheaper.
+1. That site saved money!
It doesn’t save money. It’s not needed right now, and certainly not at that location.
If and when a school is needed, it will be at a different site. And if it were to cost more to build at that site, which might or might not be the case, it would only be because the other site is closer to where the residential development is actually occurring.
Frisch is such a putz.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Looks necessary to me given the huge number of residential buildings under development...
![]()
And bonus, he found a way to do it cheaper.
+1. That site saved money!
Anonymous wrote:Yes, and he will be reelected because the people in his district are too stupid, or simply refuse to care about education in FCPS.
Voters are going to get what they deserve. Sadly every kid in FCPS will pay the price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Looks necessary to me given the huge number of residential buildings under development...
![]()
And bonus, he found a way to do it cheaper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Looks necessary to me given the huge number of residential buildings under development...
![]()
And bonus, he found a way to do it cheaper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
BS. No other School Board member, much less one running for re-election, has wasted over $60M in taxpayer money on a completely unnecessary facility. And he has a terrible reputation when it comes to constituent service - routinely ignoring people in the district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
I value his focus on school security and protection if students and families rights to information, choice of free reading materials, etc. It's not all about Dunn Lorng - every SB member has a facilities issue people harp on, but Frisch has been a solid advocate for student safety and achievement, and responsive to community (at least the times my family has contacted him).
Anonymous wrote:This thread is getting old.[/quote
Agreed. Vote on Tuesday and hush now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every time you post in this and the other threads designed to bash all Dem SB members before the election, you just remind me to go vote (for them). So thanks! Clearly you haven't studied marketing tactics.
People have posted some compelling reasons why Dunn Loring ES is a big waste of money, to which Karl and his friends invariably respond with half-truths at best. If that's what you value in your candidates, go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the projections & development projects, Tysons is going to be overcapacity.
https://www.ffxnow.com/2022/11/04/mclean-citizens-association-warns-fcps-student-enrollment-estimates-might-miss-the-mark/
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/819f3704ae9849539183d741001a645f
Dunn Loring seems like a good place to put a new school, especially if FCPS already has a building there. Blake Lane is nowhere near the new development in FCPS.
No, dumba*s. Tysons might have been a good location. The Dunn Loring site is in Vienna and surrounded by under-enrolled elementary schools.
The Blake Lake site is near multiple elementary schools with over 800 kids. Dunn Loring, if it gets built, will have to pull kids from already under-enrolled schools and leave them with around 400-450 kids.
Tyson’s would’ve been enormously expensive.