Anonymous wrote:https://youtu.be/AcXHWxgpzZ4?si=KUBACb1nt-AWQkur

Diabolical

I can’t stand it when these “reporters” make fundamental screw ups. Trust me, I want BB away for life but that wasn’t his mug shot. In the shot they show he’s wearing a red shirt yet he was arrested while wearing a blue shirt. Come on! Double check!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Hitting it up after the shooting range.

Isn’t he driving for Uber?

Per WP, not any more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Hitting it up after the shooting range.

Isn’t he driving for Uber?

His account with Uber was suspended at some point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Hitting it up after the shooting range.

Isn’t he driving for Uber?

no he is sitting in jail, and making up stories in his mind to pass the time... he can't drive anywhere now

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Hitting it up after the shooting range.

Isn’t he driving for Uber?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Hitting it up after the shooting range.

Anonymous wrote:What the heck was BB doing down in Lorton that morning when he got arrested?

Getting groceries far enough away from his house so he wouldn’t be noticed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the podcast linked above, Chief Davis recently refused to comment on the nature of JR's rx to ANY of the parties, stating that the investigation is ongoing.

Nothing else of interest on that podcast?

They said Juliana emailed herself CB’s photo on swimsuit.
Was I the only one that heard that part?

Yes that is what they said.

The Washington Post article had me thinking that CB had emailed herself the photo around the same time she texted it to BB by their use of the word "she". Their language:

"A month before the killings, authorities said, Christine Banfield sent a picture of herself to her husband, which Magalhães’s lawyer said she also sent to herself in an email: a petite woman in a one-piece bathing suit."

Based on normal English language, the lawyer is saying that CB sent the photo to her husband AND to herself. It was not JM who sent CB's photo to herself (JM).

Anonymous wrote:Does anybody know the link to check out the docket for the hearings and the trials? I am trying to get organized to be there for at least the trials.

Upcoming for Juliana:
Criminal Trial Jury 11/12/2024 10:00 AM Penney S. Azcarate
Motion Hearing - Criminal 09/26/2024 09:00 AM Penney S. Azcarate ruling (this is the one about suppressing evidence)

Upcoming for Brendan:
Criminal Trial Jury 02/03/2025 10:00 AM Penney S. Azcarate
** this is likely to be delayed as defense has not yet reviewed all of the data given by the prosecution

Anonymous wrote:Does anybody know the link to check out the docket for the hearings and the trials? I am trying to get organized to be there for at least the trials.

Case info with upcoming hearing dates
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/apps/ECS_Public/

Daily docket
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourtdocket/

Does anybody know the link to check out the docket for the hearings and the trials? I am trying to get organized to be there for at least the trials.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is the big deal about reading the indictment? We know what crimes the grand jury felt there was enough evidence to charge him with, that’s the most important thing.

During the indictment hearing, the grand jury was brought forth evidence on which they need to determine if there’s enough to indict the person. I think everyone was hoping the indictment documents would have that evidence listed since the indictment hearing was not made public and came as a surprise to everyone the morning of his arrest.

I believe grand jury hearings are typically not public. Indictments don’t usually include evidence, only the charges.

The grand jury hears the evidence and decides whether it is sufficient to go forward with charges. The trial is where the evidence is presented publicly, not the grand jury hearing.

Anonymous wrote:What is the big deal about reading the indictment? We know what crimes the grand jury felt there was enough evidence to charge him with, that’s the most important thing.

During the indictment hearing, the grand jury was brought forth evidence on which they need to determine if there’s enough to indict the person. I think everyone was hoping the indictment documents would have that evidence listed since the indictment hearing was not made public and came as a surprise to everyone the morning of his arrest.

I received a copy of it and there’s no evidence outlined as others thought there might be. It literally just list the counts. Like this:

COUNT I
The Grand Jurors of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in and for the body of the County of Fairfax, and now attending the said Court at its September Term, 2024, charges that: On or about the 24th day of February 2023, in the County of Fairfax, Brendan Robert Banfield willfully, deliberately, and with premeditation did kill and murder Christine Banfield as a part of the same act or transaction during which he did also kill and murder Joseph Ryan.
Va. Code §18.2-31 (7)
VCC MUR-0924-F1
COUNT

What is the big deal about reading the indictment? We know what crimes the grand jury felt there was enough evidence to charge him with, that’s the most important thing.