Anonymous wrote:Guys, the indictment is just a paper saying exactly what the podcast lady read…. Nothing else. That’s all that’s in the document.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.
Which link?
Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Per the podcast linked above, Chief Davis recently refused to comment on the nature of JR's rx to ANY of the parties, stating that the investigation is ongoing.
Nothing else of interest on that podcast?
They said Juliana emailed herself CB’s photo on swimsuit.
Was I the only one that heard that part?
Yes that is what they said.
The Washington Post article had me thinking that CB had emailed herself the photo around the same time she texted it to BB by their use of the word "she". Their language:
"A month before the killings, authorities said, Christine Banfield sent a picture of herself to her husband, which Magalhães’s lawyer said she also sent to herself in an email: a petite woman in a one-piece bathing suit."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.
Unless VA state court works differently?
We need that document. Not some podcast.
I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.
Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.
If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?
They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?
Hey! I live herelol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.
Unless VA state court works differently?
We need that document. Not some podcast.
I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.
Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.
If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?
They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?
Hey! I live herelol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.
Unless VA state court works differently?
We need that document. Not some podcast.
I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.
Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.
If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?
They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.
Unless VA state court works differently?
We need that document. Not some podcast.
I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.
Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.
If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?
They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.
Unless VA state court works differently?
We need that document. Not some podcast.
I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.
Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.
If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?