Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:24     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.


For the hundredth time, Justin was no longer a defendant in this case. He didn’t even have to show up for trial.

Blake stans are so delusional and for what? You’ll never see her in a movie again and her hair company is winding down. Moving to London and confirming there will be no Deadpool four is the best decision the couple could’ve made.

I just hope the divorce chatter goes away. As much as I don’t like Blake and Ryan, I do not want to see their marriage destroyed over this.


Exactly. Justin wasn't a defendant. Wayfarer could care less about a statement appeasing Blake. It doesn't hurt them in any way. Why is this so hard for people to grasp?


She didn’t even get an apology. The Blake bot attempts to spin are so humorous.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:19     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.


For the hundredth time, Justin was no longer a defendant in this case. He didn’t even have to show up for trial.

Blake stans are so delusional and for what? You’ll never see her in a movie again and her hair company is winding down. Moving to London and confirming there will be no Deadpool four is the best decision the couple could’ve made.

I just hope the divorce chatter goes away. As much as I don’t like Blake and Ryan, I do not want to see their marriage destroyed over this.


Exactly. Justin wasn't a defendant. Wayfarer could care less about a statement appeasing Blake. It doesn't hurt them in any way. Why is this so hard for people to grasp?
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:18     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.


For the hundredth time, Justin was no longer a defendant in this case. He didn’t even have to show up for trial.

Blake stans are so delusional and for what? You’ll never see her in a movie again and her hair company is winding down. Moving to London and confirming there will be no Deadpool four is the best decision the couple could’ve made.

I just hope the divorce chatter goes away. As much as I don’t like Blake and Ryan, I do not want to see their marriage destroyed over this.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:17     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.


Blake had been on a long losing streak that continued last week. Imagine going through to trial and having Van Zan, perjury and the fact that people just hate her for being her exposed.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:14     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
This thing about the dailies is such a nothing, the person that predicted this was spun up because something bad was coming for Justin was spot on.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:13     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Good for Blake. She forced them to say that her point of view had merit and deserved to be heard. Yes it did.


She quite literally was shown to be a liar and had her career ruined. And it was only getting worse at trial here there would be abundant evidence that people find her unlikable whenever she opens her mouth in an unscripted setting.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:11     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:The delulu Baldoni nuts are a hoot.

The joint statement favored Lively. Period. No denial of Wayfarer bad behavior, in fact a tacit admission of guilt re: "challenges" and the need to avoid any improprieties.

Maybe there is a literacy issue here?


Ending this goat rodeo was the best thing for both sides. Blake wanted some kind of vindication and Wayfarer just wanted it to be over. I don't agree that the statement means anything beyond appeasing Blake to end this nightmare.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:10     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Good for Blake. She forced them to say that her point of view had merit and deserved to be heard. Yes it did.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:08     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:No way this settlement didn't involve cash to Blake. At this point there were only two ways for Blake to win -- outright winning at trial (always a gamble with a jury, especially so in SH/retaliation cases, see entire thread for why), or cash settlement.

If Wayfarer offered her nothing, she might as well roll the dice on a trial.

So I would assume she got money plus attorneys fees, but we'll never find out how much because the agreement will have an airtight NDA.


The statement was so clearly pro-Blake, I suspect that's all she really wanted. Neither side wanted any more dirty laundry aired but there was zero need for Wayfarer to make that kind of supportive statement unless there was good evidence to support the retaliation claim (as the judge indicated). Neither wanted this to go to trial, but for different reasons.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:07     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:The delulu Baldoni nuts are a hoot.

The joint statement favored Lively. Period. No denial of Wayfarer bad behavior, in fact a tacit admission of guilt re: "challenges" and the need to avoid any improprieties.

Maybe there is a literacy issue here?


On your part, as always.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:05     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
The delulu Baldoni nuts are a hoot.

The joint statement favored Lively. Period. No denial of Wayfarer bad behavior, in fact a tacit admission of guilt re: "challenges" and the need to avoid any improprieties.

Maybe there is a literacy issue here?
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:05     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way this settlement didn't involve cash to Blake. At this point there were only two ways for Blake to win -- outright winning at trial (always a gamble with a jury, especially so in SH/retaliation cases, see entire thread for why), or cash settlement.

If Wayfarer offered her nothing, she might as well roll the dice on a trial.

So I would assume she got money plus attorneys fees, but we'll never find out how much because the agreement will have an airtight NDA.


Sorry but this is a dumb take. Blake knew she would likely lose and had to cut her losses. The trial would have been the final nail in her coffin. She isn’t getting any money. What she got was a confidential withdraw of her claims


Yes and it was a gift to her
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:03     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:No way this settlement didn't involve cash to Blake. At this point there were only two ways for Blake to win -- outright winning at trial (always a gamble with a jury, especially so in SH/retaliation cases, see entire thread for why), or cash settlement.

If Wayfarer offered her nothing, she might as well roll the dice on a trial.

So I would assume she got money plus attorneys fees, but we'll never find out how much because the agreement will have an airtight NDA.


Sorry but this is a dumb take. Blake knew she would likely lose and had to cut her losses. The trial would have been the final nail in her coffin. She isn’t getting any money. What she got was a confidential withdraw of her claims
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:03     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:This is a loss and an attempt to save face for Blake


Absolutely. And she should be happy to have it, the trial would only have drug her rep down further.
Anonymous
Post 05/04/2026 17:02     Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:No way this settlement didn't involve cash to Blake. At this point there were only two ways for Blake to win -- outright winning at trial (always a gamble with a jury, especially so in SH/retaliation cases, see entire thread for why), or cash settlement.

If Wayfarer offered her nothing, she might as well roll the dice on a trial.

So I would assume she got money plus attorneys fees, but we'll never find out how much because the agreement will have an airtight NDA.


Delusional to the end. Blake has had nothing but losses with respect to the pretrial motions thus far and has the motion for judgment on the pleadings pending. She was just revealed to have lied about asking for dailies to destroyed. The trial would have revolved around whether people just found her unlikable.