Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Real question is will they fire Niko from Loudoun United or will Jim try to wait it out while everything just quiets down

Jim also owns Loudoun United?

Where have you been?

Anonymous wrote:Real question is will they fire Niko from Loudoun United or will Jim try to wait it out while everything just quiets down

Jim also owns Loudoun United?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The teams he coached were never competitive so why keep him as a coach or employee? What seems more disturbing is the Loudoun United role is actually a promotion. Remember, he is an owner.

Does anyone here know if NE truly has equity in Revolution or Loudoun United or if has just said as much in conversations. That would be very surprising if true….

He does have shares in both.

Anonymous wrote:The teams he coached were never competitive so why keep him as a coach or employee? What seems more disturbing is the Loudoun United role is actually a promotion. Remember, he is an owner.

Does anyone here know if NE truly has equity in Revolution or Loudoun United or if has just said as much in conversations. That would be very surprising if true….

Anonymous wrote:Real question is will they fire Niko from Loudoun United or will Jim try to wait it out while everything just quiets down

I doubt things will quiet down if anything more will come out. The next few months should be very interesting.

Real question is will they fire Niko from Loudoun United or will Jim try to wait it out while everything just quiets down

This happened at Baltimore Armour a few years ago. Mom was actually caught with a coach in the parking lot. That and a second coach was also caught.

Honestly it happens often across the US. Isn’t the first and certainly won’t be the last.

Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.

I think somebody has been playing 3D chess for years, making stuff up and keeping VRSC at the top of this website all to make them into a club that matters and people talk about. It has kind of worked. Genius.

A tale as old as time…

If there is a predatory individual that has power over the decision to have a child play competitive soccer using that authority to pressure and influence moms? What if he was an executive of said organization? I don't know about lawsuits, but how does that reflect on the organizations ownership? We are talking community youth sports here. I wonder if the DA would have an interest in it? The treatment of kids by these organizations is already piss poor. They are not commodities.

Why would there be lawsuits for a coach sleeping with married women? Is there more to the story?

Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.

You must be sheltered. Welcome to youth soccer.

Anonymous wrote:Soccer moms are miserable, i've seen a few of them get too friendly at away tournaments. Loudoun housewives!

Almost as bad as the Mclean & Arlington moms

Soccer moms are miserable, i've seen a few of them get too friendly at away tournaments. Loudoun housewives!

Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.

The only thing that is relevant right now is why he’s still around and coaching a team after essentially being kicked out of VRSC administration