Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.
Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.
Anonymous wrote:Soccer moms are miserable, i've seen a few of them get too friendly at away tournaments. Loudoun housewives!
Anonymous wrote:Making stuff up for years, certainly not me. You mean the infidelity accusations, the paying players to play, free club dues to certain players, the coaching turnover. That wasn't me, just an observer waiting for the crash. Nice try though.
Anonymous wrote:What a train wreck, standing by to hear about the lawsuits.
Anonymous wrote:The teams he coached were never competitive so why keep him as a coach or employee? What seems more disturbing is the Loudoun United role is actually a promotion. Remember, he is an owner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes pretty much!
Although this thread may be talking about 2 different individuals because the one I referenced having affairs with multiple mothers and other women at the club is still listed with a team.
Who are you referencing?