Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

There wasn't even a reason to pull their service vehicles over and get out of their pick up trucks. It all went down from there. They could have just continued on to their break.

I would love someone to address that. All the other cars went through. Why did they stop and force a confrontation?

They are not traffic cops so since she wasn't physically impeding them...

Any thoughts?

When one is further back in a line, one doesn't always know what is happening. Possibly they stopped as it wasn't clear if they were to proceed. The videos present a somewhat chaotic situation, not one following best practices on how law enforcement directs traffic, etc.

Regardless, why was he taping her with his right hand, then transferred his phone to his R hand to pull his revolver? ICE/CBP are now using a surveillance program where they are trying to collect as many faces as they can to upload to the program and match with other personal data, some harvested by Musk/DOGE. Was he frustrated that he wasn't meeting his facial upload quota? He clearly should not have been back on the street after his hospitalization. I find it interesting that the upper echelons of the admin knew so quickly who he was as well as his history as if the chain of command was Ross -> Noem. That is in no way typical for an agency.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was raised to stay away from law enforcement as much as possible. To not harass or get near law enforcement. And to never go near any so called protests. I think my parents did a good job. I drill this into my kids almost everyday. I suggest that any and all parents do the same. Tell your kids to stay away from law enforcement and protests.

ICE is only there to enforce immigration law. There is no reason they should be shooting Americans.

Unless they are agitators paid to harass and impede federal agents with their cars and drive into armed agents when resisting arrest.

Have you all ever seen proof that protestors are paid?

There’s no proof that protesters are paid, but DHS is paying influencers to promote ICE.

https://mashable.com/article/ice-recruiting-social-media-influencers-leaked-document?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Manual&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZnRzaAPTQtNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeYmKtAX8Wrteo5NM1-T0nsfhq7rwnTbwZY8VvPaRU9Znkl6nyqXP3RmStu98_aem_ujS_F8q9sjcFEjIsQQPY9A

Taking another page from the fascist and racist Israeli apartheid state.

Give it a rest with your obsession with Israel. Hard for you to believe, I know, because Tik Tok tells you otherwise, but this has nothing to do with Israel …. Or even, gasp!, zionists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Minneapolis is an occupied city. ICE is Trump’s private army of thugs. Would much rather have illegal immigrants vs illegal police state.

And you is what is wrong with democrats in this country follows the laws and don’t have problem. If you want to protest protest congress to change the laws not interfere with federal investigations.

Interacting with Good was part of an investigation?

Good was interfering with ice investigations. She has nobody to
Blame but her. End of story

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be interesting for the jury. On IG some woman pointed out that just after Goode's girlfriend taunts the ICE officer, he switches his camera into his left hand. This allows him to pull his gun in his right...suggesting pre-meditation.

I thought it was Goode's wife.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was raised to stay away from law enforcement as much as possible. To not harass or get near law enforcement. And to never go near any so called protests. I think my parents did a good job. I drill this into my kids almost everyday. I suggest that any and all parents do the same. Tell your kids to stay away from law enforcement and protests.

ICE is only there to enforce immigration law. There is no reason they should be shooting Americans.

Unless they are agitators paid to harass and impede federal agents with their cars and drive into armed agents when resisting arrest.

Have you all ever seen proof that protestors are paid?

There’s no proof that protesters are paid, but DHS is paying influencers to promote ICE.

https://mashable.com/article/ice-recruiting-social-media-influencers-leaked-document?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Manual&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZnRzaAPTQtNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeYmKtAX8Wrteo5NM1-T0nsfhq7rwnTbwZY8VvPaRU9Znkl6nyqXP3RmStu98_aem_ujS_F8q9sjcFEjIsQQPY9A

Taking another page from the fascist and racist Israeli apartheid state.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

There wasn't even a reason to pull their service vehicles over and get out of their pick up trucks. It all went down from there. They could have just continued on to their break.

I would love someone to address that. All the other cars went through. Why did they stop and force a confrontation?

They are not traffic cops so since she wasn't physically impeding them...

Any thoughts?

Anonymous wrote:This will be interesting for the jury. On IG some woman pointed out that just after Goode's girlfriend taunts the ICE officer, he switches his camera into his left hand. This allows him to pull his gun in his right...suggesting pre-meditation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

There wasn't even a reason to pull their service vehicles over and get out of their pick up trucks. It all went down from there. They could have just continued on to their break.

I would love someone to address that. All the other cars went through. Why did they stop and force a confrontation?

They are not traffic cops so since she wasn't physically impeding them...

Any thoughts?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

What? Are you really here defending his actions?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Minneapolis is an occupied city. ICE is Trump’s private army of thugs. Would much rather have illegal immigrants vs illegal police state.

And you is what is wrong with democrats in this country follows the laws and don’t have problem. If you want to protest protest congress to change the laws not interfere with federal investigations.

Interacting with Good was part of an investigation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was raised to stay away from law enforcement as much as possible. To not harass or get near law enforcement. And to never go near any so called protests. I think my parents did a good job. I drill this into my kids almost everyday. I suggest that any and all parents do the same. Tell your kids to stay away from law enforcement and protests.

ICE is only there to enforce immigration law. There is no reason they should be shooting Americans.

Unless they are agitators paid to harass and impede federal agents with their cars and drive into armed agents when resisting arrest.

Have you all ever seen proof that protestors are paid?

There’s no proof that protesters are paid, but DHS is paying influencers to promote ICE.

https://mashable.com/article/ice-recruiting-social-media-influencers-leaked-document?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Manual&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZnRzaAPTQtNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeYmKtAX8Wrteo5NM1-T0nsfhq7rwnTbwZY8VvPaRU9Znkl6nyqXP3RmStu98_aem_ujS_F8q9sjcFEjIsQQPY9A

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

The ICE agent should know how to diffuse situations instead of incite them. He should know not to keep walking in front of a running car repeatedly to take a video if he perceived an actual threat.

He didn't perceive a threat, he was trying to make something happen so he could shoot her.

Even their training manual cites these values. So Ross was in stark violation there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Minneapolis is an occupied city. ICE is Trump’s private army of thugs. Would much rather have illegal immigrants vs illegal police state.

And you is what is wrong with democrats in this country follows the laws and don’t have problem. If you want to protest protest congress to change the laws not interfere with federal investigations.