Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i think she meant bougie. bougie means fancy. the explanation above is probably correct.

i didn't know he wanted to play dress up cowboy. i thought he liked to play dress up motorcycle gang member. <shrug>

True— but he has a bunch of picks wearing their hats. And he sometimes has worn pearl snap shirts. But, you’re correct, he plays dress up motorcycle dude more than anything. <shrug>

Anonymous wrote:i think she meant bougie. bougie means fancy. the explanation above is probably correct.

i didn't know he wanted to play dress up cowboy. i thought he liked to play dress up motorcycle gang member. <shrug>

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JH normalizes mediocrity.

Screaming at your kids in front of your colleagues ?

Excusing your own bad behavior by reminding yourself that you fed them breakfast and made their lunches (hello normal parenting responsibilities) ?

Dumping parenting responsibilities onto one of your other children (Ben driving Remy to school, Ben cleaning the kitchen, Ben taking his sister and her friends to the mall so Mom could go out and party ?

The passive aggressive - rubbing it in the exes face - look at me living my best life without you - posts are obvious and gross. It probably pisses her off to no end that he has stopped engaging (even indirectly ) on Insta.

I can't imagine her attorney is ok with all her posts unless it is part of a plan to goad BH into some sort of action which would reflect badly on him.

I find it hard to believe that NONE of her kids or their friends have dropped a dime anywhere on social media. Kids talk - thats their thing. But pretty much radio silence from everyone in the Hatmaker camp. Which kind of has me wondering is whatever triggered the split something that might reflect badly on a lot of people, not just BH and JH ?

⬆️.. yep.... She’s always been great about pawning her kids off on others. I’m telling ya— it is all about her. I’m surprised too that nothing has leaked. I do find it interesting that their really close friends have seems to stick in her camp— (Pruets and Sheltons).

I've seen some cracks lately. A friend of hers posted an instagram rant about bitter divorces and using children as pawns. After people asked if she was talking about Jen, she deleted it.

Her whole rant about her kid being late for school and screaming at them while her colleagues watched was straight up abusive. And for her colleagues to respond on Insta with basically a shrug emoji is sick. For someone that worships Brene Brown she has zero people around her telling her that 1) acting like that 2) in front of others 3) thinking it's precious and worth sharing is NOT OK.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JH normalizes mediocrity.

Screaming at your kids in front of your colleagues ?

Excusing your own bad behavior by reminding yourself that you fed them breakfast and made their lunches (hello normal parenting responsibilities) ?

Dumping parenting responsibilities onto one of your other children (Ben driving Remy to school, Ben cleaning the kitchen, Ben taking his sister and her friends to the mall so Mom could go out and party ?

The passive aggressive - rubbing it in the exes face - look at me living my best life without you - posts are obvious and gross. It probably pisses her off to no end that he has stopped engaging (even indirectly ) on Insta.

I can't imagine her attorney is ok with all her posts unless it is part of a plan to goad BH into some sort of action which would reflect badly on him.

I find it hard to believe that NONE of her kids or their friends have dropped a dime anywhere on social media. Kids talk - thats their thing. But pretty much radio silence from everyone in the Hatmaker camp. Which kind of has me wondering is whatever triggered the split something that might reflect badly on a lot of people, not just BH and JH ?

⬆️.. yep.... She’s always been great about pawning her kids off on others. I’m telling ya— it is all about her. I’m surprised too that nothing has leaked. I do find it interesting that their really close friends have seems to stick in her camp— (Pruets and Sheltons).

Anonymous wrote:JH normalizes mediocrity.

Screaming at your kids in front of your colleagues ?

Excusing your own bad behavior by reminding yourself that you fed them breakfast and made their lunches (hello normal parenting responsibilities) ?

Dumping parenting responsibilities onto one of your other children (Ben driving Remy to school, Ben cleaning the kitchen, Ben taking his sister and her friends to the mall so Mom could go out and party ?

The passive aggressive - rubbing it in the exes face - look at me living my best life without you - posts are obvious and gross. It probably pisses her off to no end that he has stopped engaging (even indirectly ) on Insta.

I can't imagine her attorney is ok with all her posts unless it is part of a plan to goad BH into some sort of action which would reflect badly on him.

I find it hard to believe that NONE of her kids or their friends have dropped a dime anywhere on social media. Kids talk - thats their thing. But pretty much radio silence from everyone in the Hatmaker camp. Which kind of has me wondering is whatever triggered the split something that might reflect badly on a lot of people, not just BH and JH ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if Glenon Doyle's Together Rising is like this too? isn't there some website where you cans see what percent goes to overhead and what percent goes to actual charity?

Charity Navigator.

That was what started my rabbit hole because Legacy Collective doesn’t show up on Charity Navigator.

Together Rising is on Charity Navigator.

I looked into Together Rising once, because I was skeptical, but it appears legit.

It’s considered failing on Charity Navigator.

Really? When I checked pretty much everything that came in was disbursed.

Yes. 50/100 and the site said that’s a failing rating.

I remember Together Rising made such a big deal about family reunification. I wonder how much her sissy was paid for her role as a lawyer and face on the video. Also, do they have a board of directors.

Their rating is so low for reasons other than disbursement (that is something like 96/97% to programs). The low rating is for no audit and not meeting board of directors criteria.

Interesting. I'm the PP who'd check it previously (can't remember how long ago exactly) and Charity Navigator has changed how they assess charities.

They're getting dinged for not having enough non-family board members.

Brandon’s sister and husband are on the board. Nepotism is full display....

As they should.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if Glenon Doyle's Together Rising is like this too? isn't there some website where you cans see what percent goes to overhead and what percent goes to actual charity?

Charity Navigator.

That was what started my rabbit hole because Legacy Collective doesn’t show up on Charity Navigator.

Together Rising is on Charity Navigator.

I looked into Together Rising once, because I was skeptical, but it appears legit.

It’s considered failing on Charity Navigator.

Really? When I checked pretty much everything that came in was disbursed.

Yes. 50/100 and the site said that’s a failing rating.

I remember Together Rising made such a big deal about family reunification. I wonder how much her sissy was paid for her role as a lawyer and face on the video. Also, do they have a board of directors.

Their rating is so low for reasons other than disbursement (that is something like 96/97% to programs). The low rating is for no audit and not meeting board of directors criteria.

Interesting. I'm the PP who'd check it previously (can't remember how long ago exactly) and Charity Navigator has changed how they assess charities. They're getting dinged for not having enough non-family board members.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if Glenon Doyle's Together Rising is like this too? isn't there some website where you cans see what percent goes to overhead and what percent goes to actual charity?

Charity Navigator.

That was what started my rabbit hole because Legacy Collective doesn’t show up on Charity Navigator.

Together Rising is on Charity Navigator.

I looked into Together Rising once, because I was skeptical, but it appears legit.

It’s considered failing on Charity Navigator.

Really? When I checked pretty much everything that came in was disbursed.

Yes. 50/100 and the site said that’s a failing rating.

I remember Together Rising made such a big deal about family reunification. I wonder how much her sissy was paid for her role as a lawyer and face on the video. Also, do they have a board of directors.

Their rating is so low for reasons other than disbursement (that is something like 96/97% to programs). The low rating is for no audit and not meeting board of directors criteria.

Interesting. I'm the PP who'd check it previously (can't remember how long ago exactly) and Charity Navigator has changed how they assess charities. They're getting dinged for not having enough non-family board members.