Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

I'm sure you were just waiting to say that but it doesn't apply to this case. He was asking her to leash her dog to preserve the birdwatching area. He only pulled out his camera when she got aggressive and threatened to call the police. As a black man, this was his only protection against her lies which could've gotten him arrested or worse.

Save your comments for another thread...this isn't the one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

"these people"

Yes, ‘these people’ and no I’m not white and yes I mentioned ‘these people’ doesn’t mean any color in particular. Yes I’m tired of these people always looking for problems and bringing down people of my color which is noble of your business.

Are you Black?

Anonymous wrote:https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2020/05/26/man-dies-after-being-arrested-by-minneapolis-police-fbi-called-to-investigate/

That was just so hard to watch. No one deserves to die like that. I really hope they indict that cop for murder.

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

What people are purple

*none of your business

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

"these people"

Yes, ‘these people’ and no I’m not white and yes I mentioned ‘these people’ doesn’t mean any color in particular. Yes I’m tired of these people always looking for problems and bringing down people of my color which is noble of your business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't miss any part of the story. She threatened him by calling the cops and acting like he was going to rape her. Also note that she was using his skin color as a way to emphasize the importance of the police coming to help her. She also nearly strangled her dog. But what you are missing is that he also bears some blame, was threatening her, illegally videotaped her, then tried to destroy her by posting it on Facebook.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ILLEGALLY VIDEOTAPING HER IN A PUBLIC AREA.

She was in a public place. It's not illegal!!

Exactly. To those claiming that he had no right to videotape her in a public place, have you ever seen TMZ or YouTube? Funny how we forget reality when we're trying to make a case for someone.

Yes, it is legal to videotape someone in a public area without their consent. It happens all the time and I'm sure you've never questioned it before when it's for your entertainment purposes.

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

You seem confused. The only person with a chip on their shoulder and who was clearly wanting to feel important is the woman who thinks she doesn't have to follow the rules, became completely unhinged when asked to follow the rules, approached the man, threatened to call the cops and lie to them about him, and then did so.

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

Do the crime, do the time. Love that it was captured. Everyone should be so camera ready. Even Trump was caught on camera admitting that he sexually assaults women by grabbing their pu$$ies.

Anonymous wrote:What people are also ignoring:

1) He thought he was the police and could enforce the law. What he should have done is called the police if it was so important.
2) He was luring dogs with treats (like he always does) and vaguely implied he would "do something she didn't like". He used the word "do", not "give", which implied he was using the treat to lure the dog so he could "do" something else to it. Giving treats to dogs is not a threat.
3) He wasn't wearing a mask, she was.
4) He called her a Karen, so in his heart he is likely as racist as she is.
5) He video-taped only her reaction, not his initial words. There's no telling what he said initially, aside from what he says in his Facebook post. It's against the law to record someone in NY without the second person's permission. She could rightfully sue him, not only for illegal wiretapping/recording, but for libel. He has ruined her life.
6) Luring dogs with treats does not solve the leash problem, so it is highly unlikely that he was threatening to give her dog treats. It is more probably that he wanted her to think that he was going to poison her dog, or take her dog.
7) If this was a white male, the media and court of public opinion would be on her side. A white male would have been seen as "mansplaining" the law to her, and threatening to hurt her dog.

No, people are not ignoring anything, but you are the classic "blaming the victim" person turning facts against the victim to try and justify the abuse.

1) He made a respectful request that she follow the law by leashing her dog. She is the one who refused to leash her dog or take the dog out of the reserved area. Why should he call the police when a polite request might solve the problem? She is the one who turned rabid after being asked to follow the law and leash her dog.
2) You are correct, giving treats to dogs is not a threat. So she completely fabricated a story about him threatening her dog because she was relying on her white privilege to break the laws and did not like that a black man would dare to try and question her right to do as she wanted and flaunt the law.
3) There is no evidence whether or not he was wearing a mask. All we know is that he was wearing a bicycle helmet.
4) He did not call her Karen. His sister did when she posted the video on Twitter.
5) No, it is not against the law to record a person in public. It is only illegal to record a person when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. In this case, she was in a public park and the proscription against recording does not apply. This article talks about her possible legal consequences and does not cite his recording her as a legal issue:
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/when-being-a-karen-turns-criminal-central-park-dog-walker-could-be-prosecuted/
6) So you think it is more likely that he was carrying poison in his pocket "just in case" than that he was carrying treats to lure dogs away from the area reserved for birds. Strange. How many people carry poison in their pocket for a walk in the park, especially to go bird watching? And with his sister? He said that dogs are frequently unleashed in this area that he visits regularly and he carries treats to get people to control their dogs. Much more likely than that he went into the park carrying poison to hunt for unleashed dogs to poison them.
7) No. Maybe in the past, but after the case last year of the Supreme Court nomination and this year's case of the accusation against the current Democratic Presidential candidate, women, especially women who fabricate accusations of assault are being taken to task. If she had pulled the same stunt with a white man, calling the police and accusing the man of attacking her dog and threatening and attacking him, she would have faced social repercussions. Not quite as strong as because she introduced race. But still she would have been publicly shamed. Probably still would have lost her dog, maybe faced mild wrist slapping at work, but the race issue is going to cause her far more severe repercussions.

You need to stop blaming the victim and defending an indefensible racist crime. Hopefully she does get the misdemeanor false police report that she deserves.

Anonymous wrote:So tired of these people. Always with the camera ready. I’d love to see what happens before the camera goes on. Always with a chip on their shoulder. Hope it makes you feel nice and big when you upload these stupid videos. I don’t care if you’re black or white or yellow or purple. These people with the cameras feel small and want to prove they’re important. Love provoking to go viral. Get a life.

"these people"